alarmtimer: Use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848589 commit f18ddc13 upstream. ENOTSUPP is not supposed to be returned to userspace. This was found on an OpenPower machine, where the RTC does not support set_alarm. On that system, a clock_nanosleep(CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM, ...) results in "524 Unknown error 524" Replace it with EOPNOTSUPP which results in the expected "95 Operation not supported" error. Fixes: 1c6b39ad (alarmtimers: Return -ENOTSUPP if no RTC device is present) Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190903171802.28314-1-cascardo@canonical.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment