xen/manage: don't complain about an empty value in control/sysrq node

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798770

[ Upstream commit 87dffe86 ]

When guest receives a sysrq request from the host it acknowledges it by
writing '\0' to control/sysrq xenstore node. This, however, make xenstore
watch fire again but xenbus_scanf() fails to parse empty value with "%c"
format string:

 sysrq: SysRq : Emergency Sync
 Emergency Sync complete
 xen:manage: Error -34 reading sysrq code in control/sysrq

Ignore -ERANGE the same way we already ignore -ENOENT, empty value in
control/sysrq is totally legal.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>

drivers/xen/manage.c

@@ -280,9 +280,11 @@ static void sysrq_handler(struct xenbus_watch *watch, const char **vec,
 		/*
 		 * The Xenstore watch fires directly after registering it and
 		 * after a suspend/resume cycle. So ENOENT is no error but
-		 * might happen in those cases.
+		 * might happen in those cases. ERANGE is observed when we get
+		 * an empty value (''), this happens when we acknowledge the
+		 * request by writing '\0' below.
 		 */
-		if (err != -ENOENT)
+		if (err != -ENOENT && err != -ERANGE)
 			pr_err("Error %d reading sysrq code in control/sysrq\n",
 			       err);
 		xenbus_transaction_end(xbt, 1);