Commit e2fd06f6 authored by Marc Zyngier's avatar Marc Zyngier Committed by Olof Johansson

ARM: imx: irq: fix buggy usage of irq_data irq field

mach-imx directly references to the irq field in
struct irq_data, and uses this to directly poke hardware register.

But irq is the *virtual* irq number, something that has nothing
to do with the actual HW irq (stored in the hwirq field). And once
we put the stacked domain code in action, the whole thing explodes,
as these two values are *very* different.

Just replacing all instances of irq with hwirq fixes the issue.
Tested-by: default avatarFabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Acked-by: default avatarShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
parent 7e8f403f
......@@ -56,14 +56,14 @@ void imx_gpc_post_resume(void)
static int imx_gpc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
{
unsigned int idx = d->irq / 32 - 1;
unsigned int idx = d->hwirq / 32 - 1;
u32 mask;
/* Sanity check for SPI irq */
if (d->irq < 32)
if (d->hwirq < 32)
return -EINVAL;
mask = 1 << d->irq % 32;
mask = 1 << d->hwirq % 32;
gpc_wake_irqs[idx] = on ? gpc_wake_irqs[idx] | mask :
gpc_wake_irqs[idx] & ~mask;
......@@ -97,12 +97,12 @@ void imx_gpc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
u32 val;
/* Sanity check for SPI irq */
if (d->irq < 32)
if (d->hwirq < 32)
return;
reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->irq / 32 - 1) * 4;
reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
val = readl_relaxed(reg);
val &= ~(1 << d->irq % 32);
val &= ~(1 << d->hwirq % 32);
writel_relaxed(val, reg);
}
......@@ -112,12 +112,12 @@ void imx_gpc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
u32 val;
/* Sanity check for SPI irq */
if (d->irq < 32)
if (d->hwirq < 32)
return;
reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->irq / 32 - 1) * 4;
reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4;
val = readl_relaxed(reg);
val |= 1 << (d->irq % 32);
val |= 1 << (d->hwirq % 32);
writel_relaxed(val, reg);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment