Commit e329e710 authored by Kees Cook's avatar Kees Cook Committed by Jakub Kicinski

NFC: nci: Bounds check struct nfc_target arrays

While running under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, syzkaller reported:

  memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 129) of single field "target->sensf_res" at net/nfc/nci/ntf.c:260 (size 18)

This appears to be a legitimate lack of bounds checking in
nci_add_new_protocol(). Add the missing checks.

Reported-by: syzbot+210e196cef4711b65139@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000001c590f05ee7b3ff4@google.com
Fixes: 019c4fba ("NFC: Add NCI multiple targets support")
Signed-off-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarKrzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221202214410.never.693-kees@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent e8b4fc13
......@@ -240,6 +240,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev,
target->sens_res = nfca_poll->sens_res;
target->sel_res = nfca_poll->sel_res;
target->nfcid1_len = nfca_poll->nfcid1_len;
if (target->nfcid1_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->nfcid1))
return -EPROTO;
if (target->nfcid1_len > 0) {
memcpy(target->nfcid1, nfca_poll->nfcid1,
target->nfcid1_len);
......@@ -248,6 +250,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev,
nfcb_poll = (struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcb_poll *)params;
target->sensb_res_len = nfcb_poll->sensb_res_len;
if (target->sensb_res_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->sensb_res))
return -EPROTO;
if (target->sensb_res_len > 0) {
memcpy(target->sensb_res, nfcb_poll->sensb_res,
target->sensb_res_len);
......@@ -256,6 +260,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev,
nfcf_poll = (struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcf_poll *)params;
target->sensf_res_len = nfcf_poll->sensf_res_len;
if (target->sensf_res_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->sensf_res))
return -EPROTO;
if (target->sensf_res_len > 0) {
memcpy(target->sensf_res, nfcf_poll->sensf_res,
target->sensf_res_len);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment