Commit e39701e3 authored by Danilo Krummrich's avatar Danilo Krummrich

drm/nouveau: remove incorrect __user annotations

Fix copy-paste error causing EXEC and VM_BIND syscalls data pointers
to carry incorrect __user annotations.

Fixes: b88baab8 ("drm/nouveau: implement new VM_BIND uAPI")
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDanilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230807163238.2091-4-dakr@redhat.com
parent 85b7d20f
......@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ nouveau_exec(struct nouveau_exec_job_args *args)
static int
nouveau_exec_ucopy(struct nouveau_exec_job_args *args,
struct drm_nouveau_exec __user *req)
struct drm_nouveau_exec *req)
{
struct drm_nouveau_sync **s;
u32 inc = req->wait_count;
......@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ nouveau_exec_ufree(struct nouveau_exec_job_args *args)
int
nouveau_exec_ioctl_exec(struct drm_device *dev,
void __user *data,
void *data,
struct drm_file *file_priv)
{
struct nouveau_abi16 *abi16 = nouveau_abi16_get(file_priv);
......@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ nouveau_exec_ioctl_exec(struct drm_device *dev,
struct nouveau_abi16_chan *chan16;
struct nouveau_channel *chan = NULL;
struct nouveau_exec_job_args args = {};
struct drm_nouveau_exec __user *req = data;
struct drm_nouveau_exec *req = data;
int ret = 0;
if (unlikely(!abi16))
......
......@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct nouveau_exec_job {
int nouveau_exec_job_init(struct nouveau_exec_job **job,
struct nouveau_exec_job_args *args);
int nouveau_exec_ioctl_exec(struct drm_device *dev, void __user *data,
int nouveau_exec_ioctl_exec(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file_priv);
#endif
......@@ -1687,7 +1687,7 @@ nouveau_uvmm_vm_bind(struct nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_args *args)
static int
nouveau_uvmm_vm_bind_ucopy(struct nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_args *args,
struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind __user *req)
struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind *req)
{
struct drm_nouveau_sync **s;
u32 inc = req->wait_count;
......@@ -1749,12 +1749,12 @@ nouveau_uvmm_vm_bind_ufree(struct nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_args *args)
int
nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_bind(struct drm_device *dev,
void __user *data,
void *data,
struct drm_file *file_priv)
{
struct nouveau_cli *cli = nouveau_cli(file_priv);
struct nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_args args = {};
struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind __user *req = data;
struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind *req = data;
int ret = 0;
if (unlikely(!nouveau_cli_uvmm_locked(cli)))
......
......@@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ void nouveau_uvmm_fini(struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm);
void nouveau_uvmm_bo_map_all(struct nouveau_bo *nvbov, struct nouveau_mem *mem);
void nouveau_uvmm_bo_unmap_all(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo);
int nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev, void __user *data,
int nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_init(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file_priv);
int nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_bind(struct drm_device *dev, void __user *data,
int nouveau_uvmm_ioctl_vm_bind(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *file_priv);
static inline void nouveau_uvmm_lock(struct nouveau_uvmm *uvmm)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment