Commit e458eb97 authored by Nathan Chancellor's avatar Nathan Chancellor Committed by Viresh Kumar

cpufreq: s3c64xx: Remove pointless NULL check in s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init

When building with Clang + -Wtautological-pointer-compare:

drivers/cpufreq/s3c64xx-cpufreq.c:152:6: warning: comparison of array
's3c64xx_freq_table' equal to a null pointer is always false
[-Wtautological-pointer-compare]
        if (s3c64xx_freq_table == NULL) {
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~
1 warning generated.

The definition of s3c64xx_freq_table is surrounded by an ifdef
directive for CONFIG_CPU_S3C6410, which is always true for this driver
because it depends on it in drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm (and if it
weren't, there would be a build error because s3c64xx_freq_table would
not be a defined symbol).

Resolve this warning by removing the unnecessary NULL check because it
is always false as Clang notes. While we are at it, remove the
unnecessary ifdef conditional because it is always true.

Fixes: b3748ddd ("[ARM] S3C64XX: Initial support for DVFS")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/748Signed-off-by: default avatarNathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
parent af44d180
......@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
static struct regulator *vddarm;
static unsigned long regulator_latency;
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S3C6410
struct s3c64xx_dvfs {
unsigned int vddarm_min;
unsigned int vddarm_max;
......@@ -48,7 +47,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table s3c64xx_freq_table[] = {
{ 0, 4, 800000 },
{ 0, 0, CPUFREQ_TABLE_END },
};
#endif
static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
......@@ -149,11 +147,6 @@ static int s3c64xx_cpufreq_driver_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
if (policy->cpu != 0)
return -EINVAL;
if (s3c64xx_freq_table == NULL) {
pr_err("No frequency information for this CPU\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
policy->clk = clk_get(NULL, "armclk");
if (IS_ERR(policy->clk)) {
pr_err("Unable to obtain ARMCLK: %ld\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment