Commit e6a18d36 authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Fix clobbering of r2 in bpf_gen_ld_abs

Bryce reported that he saw the following with:

  0:  r6 = r1
  1:  r1 = 12
  2:  r0 = *(u16 *)skb[r1]

The xlated sequence was incorrectly clobbering r2 with pointer
value of r6 ...

  0: (bf) r6 = r1
  1: (b7) r1 = 12
  2: (bf) r1 = r6
  3: (bf) r2 = r1
  4: (85) call bpf_skb_load_helper_16_no_cache#7692160

... and hence call to the load helper never succeeded given the
offset was too high. Fix it by reordering the load of r6 to r1.

Other than that the insn has similar calling convention than BPF
helpers, that is, r0 - r5 are scratch regs, so nothing else
affected after the insn.

Fixes: e0cea7ce ("bpf: implement ld_abs/ld_ind in native bpf")
Reported-by: default avatarBryce Kahle <bryce.kahle@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/cace836e4d07bb63b1a53e49c5dfb238a040c298.1599512096.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
parent e6135df4
......@@ -7065,8 +7065,6 @@ static int bpf_gen_ld_abs(const struct bpf_insn *orig,
bool indirect = BPF_MODE(orig->code) == BPF_IND;
struct bpf_insn *insn = insn_buf;
/* We're guaranteed here that CTX is in R6. */
*insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_CTX);
if (!indirect) {
*insn++ = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, orig->imm);
} else {
......@@ -7074,6 +7072,8 @@ static int bpf_gen_ld_abs(const struct bpf_insn *orig,
if (orig->imm)
*insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, orig->imm);
}
/* We're guaranteed here that CTX is in R6. */
*insn++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_CTX);
switch (BPF_SIZE(orig->code)) {
case BPF_B:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment