Commit e7f180dc authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86/fpu: Change xstateregs_get()/set() to use ->xsave.i387 rather than ->fxsave

This is a cosmetic change: xstateregs_get() and xstateregs_set()
abuse ->fxsave to access xsave->i387.sw_reserved.

This practice is correct, ->fxsave and xsave->i387 share the same memory,
but IMHO this looks confusing.

And we can make this code more readable if we add a
"struct xsave_struct *" local variable as well.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425967585-4725-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150302183237.GB23085@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent ae486033
...@@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ int xstateregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, ...@@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ int xstateregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
unsigned int pos, unsigned int count, unsigned int pos, unsigned int count,
void *kbuf, void __user *ubuf) void *kbuf, void __user *ubuf)
{ {
struct xsave_struct *xsave = &target->thread.fpu.state->xsave;
int ret; int ret;
if (!cpu_has_xsave) if (!cpu_has_xsave)
...@@ -353,14 +354,12 @@ int xstateregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, ...@@ -353,14 +354,12 @@ int xstateregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
* memory layout in the thread struct, so that we can copy the entire * memory layout in the thread struct, so that we can copy the entire
* xstateregs to the user using one user_regset_copyout(). * xstateregs to the user using one user_regset_copyout().
*/ */
memcpy(&target->thread.fpu.state->fxsave.sw_reserved, memcpy(&xsave->i387.sw_reserved,
xstate_fx_sw_bytes, sizeof(xstate_fx_sw_bytes)); xstate_fx_sw_bytes, sizeof(xstate_fx_sw_bytes));
/* /*
* Copy the xstate memory layout. * Copy the xstate memory layout.
*/ */
ret = user_regset_copyout(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf, ret = user_regset_copyout(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf, xsave, 0, -1);
&target->thread.fpu.state->xsave, 0, -1);
return ret; return ret;
} }
...@@ -368,8 +367,8 @@ int xstateregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, ...@@ -368,8 +367,8 @@ int xstateregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
unsigned int pos, unsigned int count, unsigned int pos, unsigned int count,
const void *kbuf, const void __user *ubuf) const void *kbuf, const void __user *ubuf)
{ {
struct xsave_struct *xsave = &target->thread.fpu.state->xsave;
int ret; int ret;
struct xsave_hdr_struct *xsave_hdr;
if (!cpu_has_xsave) if (!cpu_has_xsave)
return -ENODEV; return -ENODEV;
...@@ -378,22 +377,16 @@ int xstateregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset, ...@@ -378,22 +377,16 @@ int xstateregs_set(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
if (ret) if (ret)
return ret; return ret;
ret = user_regset_copyin(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf, ret = user_regset_copyin(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf, xsave, 0, -1);
&target->thread.fpu.state->xsave, 0, -1);
/* /*
* mxcsr reserved bits must be masked to zero for security reasons. * mxcsr reserved bits must be masked to zero for security reasons.
*/ */
target->thread.fpu.state->fxsave.mxcsr &= mxcsr_feature_mask; xsave->i387.mxcsr &= mxcsr_feature_mask;
xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv &= pcntxt_mask;
xsave_hdr = &target->thread.fpu.state->xsave.xsave_hdr;
xsave_hdr->xstate_bv &= pcntxt_mask;
/* /*
* These bits must be zero. * These bits must be zero.
*/ */
memset(xsave_hdr->reserved, 0, 48); memset(&xsave->xsave_hdr.reserved, 0, 48);
return ret; return ret;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment