Commit e9523a0d authored by Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's avatar Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Committed by Thomas Gleixner

tick/common: Align tick period with the HZ tick.

With HIGHRES enabled tick_sched_timer() is programmed every jiffy to
expire the timer_list timers. This timer is programmed accurate in
respect to CLOCK_MONOTONIC so that 0 seconds and nanoseconds is the
first tick and the next one is 1000/CONFIG_HZ ms later. For HZ=250 it is
every 4 ms and so based on the current time the next tick can be
computed.

This accuracy broke since the commit mentioned below because the jiffy
based clocksource is initialized with higher accuracy in
read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset(). This higher accuracy is
inherited during the setup in tick_setup_device(). The timer still fires
every 4ms with HZ=250 but timer is no longer aligned with
CLOCK_MONOTONIC with 0 as it origin but has an offset in the us/ns part
of the timestamp. The offset differs with every boot and makes it
impossible for user land to align with the tick.

Align the tick period with CLOCK_MONOTONIC ensuring that it is always a
multiple of 1000/CONFIG_HZ ms.

Fixes: 857baa87 ("sched/clock: Enable sched clock early")
Reported-by: default avatarGusenleitner Klaus <gus@keba.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20230406095735.0_14edn3@linutronix.de
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418122639.ikgfvu3f@linutronix.de
parent e797203f
......@@ -218,9 +218,19 @@ static void tick_setup_device(struct tick_device *td,
* this cpu:
*/
if (tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_BOOT) {
ktime_t next_p;
u32 rem;
tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
tick_next_period = ktime_get();
next_p = ktime_get();
div_u64_rem(next_p, TICK_NSEC, &rem);
if (rem) {
next_p -= rem;
next_p += TICK_NSEC;
}
tick_next_period = next_p;
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
/*
* The boot CPU may be nohz_full, in which case set
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment