Commit e9cf7049 authored by Stephen Warren's avatar Stephen Warren Committed by Mark Brown

ASoC: Fix mask/val_mask confusion snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw()

snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw() has variables for both the unshifted and
shifted mask for updates commit 97404f (ASoC: Do DAPM control updates in
the middle of DAPM sequences) got confused between the two of these.
Since there's no need to keep a copy of the unshifted mask fix this and
simplify the code by using only one mask variable.

[Completely rewrote the changelog to describe the issue -- broonie.]
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: default avatarLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
parent 0fa63b69
......@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
int max = mc->max;
unsigned int mask = (1 << fls(max)) - 1;
unsigned int invert = mc->invert;
unsigned int val, val_mask;
unsigned int val;
int connect, change;
struct snd_soc_dapm_update update;
......@@ -1750,13 +1750,13 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
if (invert)
val = max - val;
val_mask = mask << shift;
mask = mask << shift;
val = val << shift;
mutex_lock(&widget->codec->mutex);
widget->value = val;
change = snd_soc_test_bits(widget->codec, reg, val_mask, val);
change = snd_soc_test_bits(widget->codec, reg, mask, val);
if (change) {
if (val)
/* new connection */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment