Commit eb496534 authored by Johannes Berg's avatar Johannes Berg Committed by David S. Miller

[NETLINK]: negative groups in netlink_setsockopt

Reading netlink_setsockopt it's not immediately clear why there isn't a
bug when you pass in negative numbers, the reason being that the >=
comparison is really unsigned although 'val' is signed because
nlk->ngroups is unsigned. Make 'val' unsigned too.

[ Update the get_user() cast to match.  --DaveM ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent f77ae939
...@@ -1012,13 +1012,14 @@ static int netlink_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, ...@@ -1012,13 +1012,14 @@ static int netlink_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
{ {
struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk); struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
int val = 0, err; unsigned int val = 0;
int err;
if (level != SOL_NETLINK) if (level != SOL_NETLINK)
return -ENOPROTOOPT; return -ENOPROTOOPT;
if (optlen >= sizeof(int) && if (optlen >= sizeof(int) &&
get_user(val, (int __user *)optval)) get_user(val, (unsigned int __user *)optval))
return -EFAULT; return -EFAULT;
switch (optname) { switch (optname) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment