Commit ec77a33e authored by Chaya Rachel Ivgi's avatar Chaya Rachel Ivgi Committed by Emmanuel Grumbach

iwlwifi: mvm: handle async temperature notification with unlocked mutex

Use RX_HANDLER_ASYNC_UNLOCKED instead of unlock and re-lock
the mutex independently.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChaya Rachel Ivgi <chaya.rachel.ivgi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
parent 5d93f3a2
......@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static const struct iwl_rx_handlers iwl_mvm_rx_handlers[] = {
RX_HANDLER(DTS_MEASUREMENT_NOTIFICATION, iwl_mvm_temp_notif,
RX_HANDLER_ASYNC_LOCKED),
RX_HANDLER_GRP(PHY_OPS_GROUP, DTS_MEASUREMENT_NOTIF_WIDE,
iwl_mvm_temp_notif, RX_HANDLER_ASYNC_LOCKED),
iwl_mvm_temp_notif, RX_HANDLER_ASYNC_UNLOCKED),
RX_HANDLER_GRP(PHY_OPS_GROUP, CT_KILL_NOTIFICATION,
iwl_mvm_ct_kill_notif, RX_HANDLER_SYNC),
......
......@@ -204,20 +204,11 @@ void iwl_mvm_temp_notif(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct iwl_rx_cmd_buffer *rxb)
if (WARN_ON(ths_crossed >= IWL_MAX_DTS_TRIPS))
return;
/*
* We are now handling a temperature notification from the firmware
* in ASYNC and hold the mutex. thermal_notify_framework will call
* us back through get_temp() which ought to send a SYNC command to
* the firmware and hence to take the mutex.
* Avoid the deadlock by unlocking the mutex here.
*/
if (mvm->tz_device.tzone) {
struct iwl_mvm_thermal_device *tz_dev = &mvm->tz_device;
mutex_unlock(&mvm->mutex);
thermal_notify_framework(tz_dev->tzone,
tz_dev->fw_trips_index[ths_crossed]);
mutex_lock(&mvm->mutex);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_THERMAL */
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment