KVM: x86/mmu: Take slots_lock when using kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast()
Acquire the per-VM slots_lock when zapping all shadow pages as part of toggling nx_huge_pages. The fast zap algorithm relies on exclusivity (via slots_lock) to identify obsolete vs. valid shadow pages, because it uses a single bit for its generation number. Holding slots_lock also obviates the need to acquire a read lock on the VM's srcu. Failing to take slots_lock when toggling nx_huge_pages allows multiple instances of kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() to run concurrently, as the other user, KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION, does not take the global kvm_lock. (kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast() does take kvm->mmu_lock, but it can be temporarily dropped by kvm_zap_obsolete_pages(), so it is not enough to enforce exclusivity). Concurrent fast zap instances causes obsolete shadow pages to be incorrectly identified as valid due to the single bit generation number wrapping, which results in stale shadow pages being left in KVM's MMU and leads to all sorts of undesirable behavior. The bug is easily confirmed by running with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and toggling nx_huge_pages via its module param. Note, until commit 4ae5acbc4936 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Take slots_lock when using kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast()", 2019-11-13) the fast zap algorithm used an ulong-sized generation instead of relying on exclusivity for correctness, but all callers except the recently added set_nx_huge_pages() needed to hold slots_lock anyways. Therefore, this patch does not have to be backported to stable kernels. Given that toggling nx_huge_pages is by no means a fast path, force it to conform to the current approach instead of reintroducing the previous generation count. Fixes: b8e8c830 ("kvm: mmu: ITLB_MULTIHIT mitigation", but NOT FOR STABLE) Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment