Commit ee161605 authored by Timo Aaltonen's avatar Timo Aaltonen Committed by Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo

UBUNTU: SAUCE: i915_bpo: Fix DP link rate math

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657353

We store DP link rates as link clock frequencies in kHz, just like all
other clock values. But, DP link rates in the DP Spec. are expressed in
Gbps/lane, which seems to have led to some confusion.

E.g., for HBR2
Max. data rate = 5.4 Gbps/lane x 4 lane x 8/10 x 1/8 = 2160000 kBps
where, 8/10 is for channel encoding and 1/8 is for bit to Byte conversion

Using link clock frequency, like we do
Max. data rate = 540000 kHz * 4 lanes = 2160000 kSymbols/s
Because, each symbol has 8 bit of data, this is 2160000 kBps
and there is no need to account for channel encoding here.

But, currently we do 540000 kHz * 4 lanes * (8/10) = 1728000 kBps

Similarly, while computing the required link bandwidth for a mode,
there is a mysterious 1/10 term.
This should simply be pixel_clock kHz * (bpp/8) to give the final result in
kBps

v2: Changed to DIV_ROUND_UP() and comment changes (Ville)
Signed-off-by: default avatarDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479160220-17794-1-git-send-email-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
(backported from drm-intel-next commit fd81c44e)
Signed-off-by: default avatarTimo Aaltonen <timo.aaltonen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: default avatarLuis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Acked-by: default avatarStefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
parent 7392f29e
......@@ -166,33 +166,23 @@ static u8 intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
return min(source_max, sink_max);
}
/*
* The units on the numbers in the next two are... bizarre. Examples will
* make it clearer; this one parallels an example in the eDP spec.
*
* intel_dp_max_data_rate for one lane of 2.7GHz evaluates as:
*
* 270000 * 1 * 8 / 10 == 216000
*
* The actual data capacity of that configuration is 2.16Gbit/s, so the
* units are decakilobits. ->clock in a drm_display_mode is in kilohertz -
* or equivalently, kilopixels per second - so for 1680x1050R it'd be
* 119000. At 18bpp that's 2142000 kilobits per second.
*
* Thus the strange-looking division by 10 in intel_dp_link_required, to
* get the result in decakilobits instead of kilobits.
*/
static int
intel_dp_link_required(int pixel_clock, int bpp)
{
return (pixel_clock * bpp + 9) / 10;
/* pixel_clock is in kHz, divide bpp by 8 for bit to Byte conversion */
return DIV_ROUND_UP(pixel_clock * bpp, 8);
}
static int
intel_dp_max_data_rate(int max_link_clock, int max_lanes)
{
return (max_link_clock * max_lanes * 8) / 10;
/* max_link_clock is the link symbol clock (LS_Clk) in kHz and not the
* link rate that is generally expressed in Gbps. Since, 8 bits of data
* is transmitted every LS_Clk per lane, there is no need to account for
* the channel encoding that is done in the PHY layer here.
*/
return max_link_clock * max_lanes;
}
static enum drm_mode_status
......@@ -3794,7 +3784,12 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
if (val == 0)
break;
/* Value read is in kHz while drm clock is saved in deca-kHz */
/* Value read multiplied by 200kHz gives the per-lane
* link rate in kHz. The source rates are, however,
* stored in terms of LS_Clk kHz. The full conversion
* back to symbols is
* (val * 200kHz)*(8/10 ch. encoding)*(1/8 bit to Byte)
*/
intel_dp->sink_rates[i] = (val * 200) / 10;
}
intel_dp->num_sink_rates = i;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment