Commit ee1ceef7 authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

workqueue: Rename wq->cpu_pwqs to wq->cpu_pwq

wq->cpu_pwqs is a percpu variable carraying one pointer to a pool_workqueue.
The field name being plural is unusual and confusing. Rename it to singular.

This patch doesn't cause any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
parent fe089f87
......@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct {
/* hot fields used during command issue, aligned to cacheline */
unsigned int flags ____cacheline_aligned; /* WQ: WQ_* flags */
struct pool_workqueue __percpu *cpu_pwqs; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
struct pool_workqueue __percpu *cpu_pwq; /* I: per-cpu pwqs */
struct pool_workqueue __rcu *numa_pwq_tbl[]; /* PWR: unbound pwqs indexed by node */
};
......@@ -1635,7 +1635,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
} else {
if (req_cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
}
pool = pwq->pool;
......@@ -3826,7 +3826,7 @@ static void rcu_free_wq(struct rcu_head *rcu)
wq_free_lockdep(wq);
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
free_percpu(wq->cpu_pwqs);
free_percpu(wq->cpu_pwq);
else
free_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs);
......@@ -4518,13 +4518,13 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
int cpu, ret;
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
wq->cpu_pwqs = alloc_percpu(struct pool_workqueue);
if (!wq->cpu_pwqs)
wq->cpu_pwq = alloc_percpu(struct pool_workqueue);
if (!wq->cpu_pwq)
return -ENOMEM;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct pool_workqueue *pwq =
per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
struct worker_pool *cpu_pools =
per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu);
......@@ -4905,7 +4905,7 @@ bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwq, cpu);
else
pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, cpu_to_node(cpu));
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment