[PATCH] zd1211rw: Consistency for address space constants
The zd1211rw address space has confused me once too many times. This patch introduces the following naming notation: Memory space is split into segments (cr, fw, eeprom) and segments may contain components (e.g. boot code inside eeprom). These names are arbitrary and only for the description below: x_START: Absolute address of segment start (previously these were named such as CR_BASE_OFFSET, but they weren't really offsets unless you were considering them as an offset to 0) x_LEN: Segment length x_y_LEN: Length of component y of segment x x_y_OFFSET: Relative address of component y into segment x. The absolute address for this component is (x_START + x_y_OFFSET) I also renamed EEPROM registers to EEPROM data. These 'registers' can't be written to using standard I/O and really represent predefined data from the vendor. Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment