Commit ef79ed20 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra

x86/entry: Make sync_regs() invocation a tail call

No point in having a call there. Spare the call/ret overhead.
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220915111146.539578813@infradead.org
parent 5a9c361a
......@@ -1062,11 +1062,8 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(error_entry)
UNTRAIN_RET
leaq 8(%rsp), %rdi /* arg0 = pt_regs pointer */
.Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs:
/* Put us onto the real thread stack. */
call sync_regs
RET
jmp sync_regs
/*
* There are two places in the kernel that can potentially fault with
......@@ -1124,7 +1121,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(error_entry)
leaq 8(%rsp), %rdi /* arg0 = pt_regs pointer */
call fixup_bad_iret
mov %rax, %rdi
jmp .Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs
jmp sync_regs
SYM_CODE_END(error_entry)
SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(error_return)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment