Commit f0e96e2e authored by Uwe Kleine-König's avatar Uwe Kleine-König Committed by Thierry Reding

pwm: pca9685: Don't check the return code of pwmchip_remove()

pwmchip_remove() returns always 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. Also the
driver core ignores the return value of pca9685_pwm_remove()
and considers the device removed anyhow. So returning early results
in a resource leak.
Signed-off-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
parent faaa2222
......@@ -601,11 +601,8 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
static int pca9685_pwm_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct pca9685 *pca = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
int ret;
ret = pwmchip_remove(&pca->chip);
if (ret)
return ret;
pwmchip_remove(&pca->chip);
if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&client->dev)) {
/* Put chip in sleep state if runtime PM is disabled */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment