Commit f1671f6d authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Linus Torvalds

ptrace: fix exit_ptrace() vs ptrace_traceme() race

Pointed out by Roland.  The bug was recently introduced by me in
"forget_original_parent: split out the un-ptrace part", commit
39c626ae.

Since that patch we have a window after exit_ptrace() drops tasklist and
before forget_original_parent() takes it again.  In this window the child
can do ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME) and nobody can untrace this child after
that.

Change ptrace_traceme() to not attach to the exiting ->real_parent.  We
don't report the error in this case, we pretend we attach right before
->real_parent calls exit_ptrace() which should untrace us anyway.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarRoland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 7b102d03
......@@ -604,10 +604,11 @@ int ptrace_traceme(void)
ret = security_ptrace_traceme(current->parent);
/*
* Set the ptrace bit in the process ptrace flags.
* Then link us on our parent's ptraced list.
* Check PF_EXITING to ensure ->real_parent has not passed
* exit_ptrace(). Otherwise we don't report the error but
* pretend ->real_parent untraces us right after return.
*/
if (!ret) {
if (!ret && !(current->real_parent->flags & PF_EXITING)) {
current->ptrace |= PT_PTRACED;
__ptrace_link(current, current->real_parent);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment