Commit f18c9a90 authored by Dave Chinner's avatar Dave Chinner Committed by Darrick J. Wong

xfs: reduce free inode accounting overhead

Shaokun Zhang reported that XFS was using substantial CPU time in
percpu_count_sum() when running a single threaded benchmark on
a high CPU count (128p) machine from xfs_mod_ifree(). The issue
is that the filesystem is empty when the benchmark runs, so inode
allocation is running with a very low inode free count.

With the percpu counter batching, this means comparisons when the
counter is less that 128 * 256 = 32768 use the slow path of adding
up all the counters across the CPUs, and this is expensive on high
CPU count machines.

The summing in xfs_mod_ifree() is only used to fire an assert if an
underrun occurs. The error is ignored by the higher level code.
Hence this is really just debug code and we don't need to run it
on production kernels, nor do we need such debug checks to return
error values just to trigger an assert.

Finally, xfs_mod_icount/xfs_mod_ifree are only called from
xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(), so get rid of them and just
directly call the percpu_counter_add/percpu_counter_compare
functions. The compare functions are now run only on debug builds as
they are internal to ASSERT() checks and so only compiled in when
ASSERTs are active (CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y or CONFIG_XFS_WARN=y).
Reported-by: default avatarShaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
parent dc3ffbb1
......@@ -1189,39 +1189,6 @@ xfs_log_sbcount(xfs_mount_t *mp)
return xfs_sync_sb(mp, true);
}
/*
* Deltas for the inode count are +/-64, hence we use a large batch size
* of 128 so we don't need to take the counter lock on every update.
*/
#define XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH 128
int
xfs_mod_icount(
struct xfs_mount *mp,
int64_t delta)
{
percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_icount, delta, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH);
if (__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_icount, 0, XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH) < 0) {
ASSERT(0);
percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_icount, -delta);
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
int
xfs_mod_ifree(
struct xfs_mount *mp,
int64_t delta)
{
percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_ifree, delta);
if (percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_ifree, 0) < 0) {
ASSERT(0);
percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_ifree, -delta);
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
/*
* Deltas for the block count can vary from 1 to very large, but lock contention
* only occurs on frequent small block count updates such as in the delayed
......
......@@ -392,8 +392,6 @@ extern int xfs_initialize_perag(xfs_mount_t *mp, xfs_agnumber_t agcount,
xfs_agnumber_t *maxagi);
extern void xfs_unmountfs(xfs_mount_t *);
extern int xfs_mod_icount(struct xfs_mount *mp, int64_t delta);
extern int xfs_mod_ifree(struct xfs_mount *mp, int64_t delta);
extern int xfs_mod_fdblocks(struct xfs_mount *mp, int64_t delta,
bool reserved);
extern int xfs_mod_frextents(struct xfs_mount *mp, int64_t delta);
......
......@@ -545,7 +545,12 @@ xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas(
* used block counts are not updated in the on disk superblock. In this case,
* XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY will not be set when the transaction is updated but we
* still need to update the incore superblock with the changes.
*
* Deltas for the inode count are +/-64, hence we use a large batch size of 128
* so we don't need to take the counter lock on every update.
*/
#define XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH 128
void
xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(
struct xfs_trans *tp)
......@@ -585,13 +590,17 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(
}
if (idelta) {
error = xfs_mod_icount(mp, idelta);
ASSERT(!error);
percpu_counter_add_batch(&mp->m_icount, idelta,
XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH);
if (idelta < 0)
ASSERT(__percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_icount, 0,
XFS_ICOUNT_BATCH) >= 0);
}
if (ifreedelta) {
error = xfs_mod_ifree(mp, ifreedelta);
ASSERT(!error);
percpu_counter_add(&mp->m_ifree, ifreedelta);
if (ifreedelta < 0)
ASSERT(percpu_counter_compare(&mp->m_ifree, 0) >= 0);
}
if (rtxdelta == 0 && !(tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment