Commit f2fd2aad authored by Masahiro Yamada's avatar Masahiro Yamada

kconfig: tests: test dependency after shuffling choices

Commit c8fb7d7e ("kconfig: fix broken dependency in randconfig-
generated .config") fixed the issue, but I did not add a test case.

This commit adds a test case that emulates the reported situation.
The test would fail without c8fb7d7e.

To handle the choice "choose X", FOO must be calculated beforehand.
FOO depends on A, which is a member of another choice "choose A or B".
Kconfig _temporarily_ assumes the value of A to proceed. The choice
"choose A or B" will be shuffled later, but the result may or may not
meet "FOO depends on A". Kconfig should invalidate the symbol values
and recompute them.

In the real example for ARCH=arm64, the choice "Instrumentation type"
needs the value of CPU_BIG_ENDIAN. The choice "Endianness" will be
shuffled later.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMasahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
parent 47ad1689
choice
prompt "This is always invisible"
depends on n
config DUMMY
bool "DUMMY"
endchoice
choice
prompt "Choose A or B"
config A
bool "A"
config B
bool "B"
endchoice
config FOO
bool "FOO"
depends on A
choice
prompt "Choose X"
depends on FOO
config X
bool "X"
endchoice
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
"""
Randomize choices with correct dependencies
When shuffling a choice may potentially disrupt certain dependencies, symbol
values must be recalculated.
Related Linux commits:
- c8fb7d7e48d11520ad24808cfce7afb7b9c9f798
"""
def test(conf):
for i in range(20):
assert conf.randconfig(seed=i) == 0
assert (conf.config_matches('expected_config0') or
conf.config_matches('expected_config1') or
conf.config_matches('expected_config2'))
#
# Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.
# Main menu
#
CONFIG_A=y
# CONFIG_B is not set
CONFIG_FOO=y
CONFIG_X=y
#
# Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.
# Main menu
#
CONFIG_A=y
# CONFIG_B is not set
# CONFIG_FOO is not set
#
# Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.
# Main menu
#
# CONFIG_A is not set
CONFIG_B=y
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment