Commit f32fb328 authored by Michael Roth's avatar Michael Roth Committed by Paolo Bonzini

KVM: x86: Add hook for determining max NPT mapping level

In the case of SEV-SNP, whether or not a 2MB page can be mapped via a
2MB mapping in the guest's nested page table depends on whether or not
any subpages within the range have already been initialized as private
in the RMP table. The existing mixed-attribute tracking in KVM is
insufficient here, for instance:

- gmem allocates 2MB page
- guest issues PVALIDATE on 2MB page
- guest later converts a subpage to shared
- SNP host code issues PSMASH to split 2MB RMP mapping to 4K
- KVM MMU splits NPT mapping to 4K
- guest later converts that shared page back to private

At this point there are no mixed attributes, and KVM would normally
allow for 2MB NPT mappings again, but this is actually not allowed
because the RMP table mappings are 4K and cannot be promoted on the
hypervisor side, so the NPT mappings must still be limited to 4K to
match this.

Add a hook to determine the max NPT mapping size in situations like
this.
Suggested-by: default avatarSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarIsaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20240501085210.2213060-3-michael.roth@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent a90764f0
...@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(vcpu_get_apicv_inhibit_reasons); ...@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(vcpu_get_apicv_inhibit_reasons);
KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(get_untagged_addr) KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(get_untagged_addr)
KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(alloc_apic_backing_page) KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(alloc_apic_backing_page)
KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(gmem_prepare) KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(gmem_prepare)
KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0(private_max_mapping_level)
KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(gmem_invalidate) KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL(gmem_invalidate)
#undef KVM_X86_OP #undef KVM_X86_OP
......
...@@ -1814,6 +1814,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops { ...@@ -1814,6 +1814,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
void *(*alloc_apic_backing_page)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); void *(*alloc_apic_backing_page)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int (*gmem_prepare)(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn, gfn_t gfn, int max_order); int (*gmem_prepare)(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn, gfn_t gfn, int max_order);
void (*gmem_invalidate)(kvm_pfn_t start, kvm_pfn_t end); void (*gmem_invalidate)(kvm_pfn_t start, kvm_pfn_t end);
int (*private_max_mapping_level)(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn);
}; };
struct kvm_x86_nested_ops { struct kvm_x86_nested_ops {
......
...@@ -4270,6 +4270,25 @@ static inline u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order) ...@@ -4270,6 +4270,25 @@ static inline u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order)
return PG_LEVEL_4K; return PG_LEVEL_4K;
} }
static u8 kvm_max_private_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
u8 max_level, int gmem_order)
{
u8 req_max_level;
if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
return PG_LEVEL_4K;
max_level = min(kvm_max_level_for_order(gmem_order), max_level);
if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
return PG_LEVEL_4K;
req_max_level = static_call(kvm_x86_private_max_mapping_level)(kvm, pfn);
if (req_max_level)
max_level = min(max_level, req_max_level);
return req_max_level;
}
static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_page_fault *fault) struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
{ {
...@@ -4287,9 +4306,9 @@ static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ...@@ -4287,9 +4306,9 @@ static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return r; return r;
} }
fault->max_level = min(kvm_max_level_for_order(max_order),
fault->max_level);
fault->map_writable = !(fault->slot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY); fault->map_writable = !(fault->slot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY);
fault->max_level = kvm_max_private_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, fault->pfn,
fault->max_level, max_order);
return RET_PF_CONTINUE; return RET_PF_CONTINUE;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment