Commit f5a222dc authored by Yueyi Li's avatar Yueyi Li Committed by Linus Torvalds

memblock: annotate memblock_is_reserved() with __init_memblock

Found warning:

  WARNING: EXPORT symbol "gsi_write_channel_scratch" [vmlinux] version generation failed, symbol will not be versioned.
  WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1e0a0): Section mismatch in reference from the function valid_phys_addr_range() to the function .init.text:memblock_is_reserved()
  The function valid_phys_addr_range() references
  the function __init memblock_is_reserved().
  This is often because valid_phys_addr_range lacks a __init
  annotation or the annotation of memblock_is_reserved is wrong.

Use __init_memblock instead of __init.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BLUPR13MB02893411BF12EACB61888E80DFAE0@BLUPR13MB0289.namprd13.prod.outlook.comSigned-off-by: default avatarYueyi Li <liyueyi@live.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 428a1cb4
......@@ -1727,7 +1727,7 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_search(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr
return -1;
}
bool __init memblock_is_reserved(phys_addr_t addr)
bool __init_memblock memblock_is_reserved(phys_addr_t addr)
{
return memblock_search(&memblock.reserved, addr) != -1;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment