Commit f5cdc9d4 authored by paulhsia's avatar paulhsia Committed by Takashi Iwai

ALSA: pcm: Fix stream lock usage in snd_pcm_period_elapsed()

If the nullity check for `substream->runtime` is outside of the lock
region, it is possible to have a null runtime in the critical section
if snd_pcm_detach_substream is called right before the lock.
Signed-off-by: default avatarpaulhsia <paulhsia@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191112171715.128727-2-paulhsia@chromium.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
parent 52869931
......@@ -1782,11 +1782,14 @@ void snd_pcm_period_elapsed(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime;
unsigned long flags;
if (PCM_RUNTIME_CHECK(substream))
if (snd_BUG_ON(!substream))
return;
runtime = substream->runtime;
snd_pcm_stream_lock_irqsave(substream, flags);
if (PCM_RUNTIME_CHECK(substream))
goto _unlock;
runtime = substream->runtime;
if (!snd_pcm_running(substream) ||
snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0(substream, 1) < 0)
goto _end;
......@@ -1797,6 +1800,7 @@ void snd_pcm_period_elapsed(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
#endif
_end:
kill_fasync(&runtime->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
_unlock:
snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irqrestore(substream, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_pcm_period_elapsed);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment