Commit f60a00d7 authored by Vitaly Kuznetsov's avatar Vitaly Kuznetsov Committed by Paolo Bonzini

KVM: arm64: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus()

Generally, it doesn't make sense to return the recommended maximum number
of vCPUs which exceeds the maximum possible number of vCPUs.

Note: ARM64 is special as the value returned by KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS differs
depending on whether it is a system-wide ioctl or a per-VM one. Previously,
KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS didn't have this difference and it seems preferable to
keep the status quo. Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus()
which is what gets returned by system-wide KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20211116163443.88707-2-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent b5aead00
......@@ -223,7 +223,14 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
r = 1;
break;
case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
r = num_online_cpus();
/*
* ARM64 treats KVM_CAP_NR_CPUS differently from all other
* architectures, as it does not always bound it to
* KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS. It should not matter much because
* this is just an advisory value.
*/
r = min_t(unsigned int, num_online_cpus(),
kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus());
break;
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment