selftests: forwarding: Use same VRF for port and VLAN upper
The test creates a separate VRF for the VLAN upper, but does not destroy it during cleanup, resulting in "RTNETLINK answers: File exists" errors. Fix by using the same VRF for the port and its VLAN upper. This is OK since their IP addresses do not overlap. Before: # ./bridge_locked_port.sh TEST: Locked port ipv4 [ OK ] TEST: Locked port ipv6 [ OK ] TEST: Locked port vlan [ OK ] # ./bridge_locked_port.sh RTNETLINK answers: File exists RTNETLINK answers: File exists RTNETLINK answers: File exists RTNETLINK answers: File exists RTNETLINK answers: File exists RTNETLINK answers: File exists TEST: Locked port ipv4 [ OK ] TEST: Locked port ipv6 [ OK ] TEST: Locked port vlan [ OK ] After: # ./bridge_locked_port.sh TEST: Locked port ipv4 [ OK ] TEST: Locked port ipv6 [ OK ] TEST: Locked port vlan [ OK ] # ./bridge_locked_port.sh TEST: Locked port ipv4 [ OK ] TEST: Locked port ipv6 [ OK ] TEST: Locked port vlan [ OK ] Fixes: b2b681a4 ("selftests: forwarding: tests of locked port feature") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment