rust: sync: reword the `Arc` safety comment for `Send`

The safety comment on `impl Send for Arc` talks about "directly"
accessing the value, when it really means "accessing the value with a
mutable reference". This commit clarifies that.
Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230531145939.3714886-2-aliceryhl@google.comSigned-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs

@@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ impl<T: ?Sized + Unsize<U>, U: ?Sized> core::ops::DispatchFromDyn<Arc<U>> for Ar
 
 // SAFETY: It is safe to send `Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` because
 // it effectively means sharing `&T` (which is safe because `T` is `Sync`); additionally, it needs
-// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` directly, for
-// example, when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
+// `T` to be `Send` because any thread that has an `Arc<T>` may ultimately access `T` using a
+// mutable reference when the reference count reaches zero and `T` is dropped.
 unsafe impl<T: ?Sized + Sync + Send> Send for Arc<T> {}
 
 // SAFETY: It is safe to send `&Arc<T>` to another thread when the underlying `T` is `Sync` for the