Commit f8603267 authored by Kan Liang's avatar Kan Liang Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf machine: Remove the indent in resolve_lbr_callchain_sample

The indent is unnecessary in resolve_lbr_callchain_sample.  Removing it
will make the following patch simpler.

Current code path for resolve_lbr_callchain_sample()

        /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
        if (i != chain_nr) {
                body of the function
                ....
                return 1;
        }

        return 0;

With the patch,

        /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
        if (i == chain_nr)
                return 0;

        body of the function
        ...
        return 1;

No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200319202517.23423-6-kan.liang@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent 6f91ea28
...@@ -2208,6 +2208,12 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread, ...@@ -2208,6 +2208,12 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
int chain_nr = min(max_stack, (int)chain->nr), i; int chain_nr = min(max_stack, (int)chain->nr), i;
u8 cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER; u8 cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
u64 ip, branch_from = 0; u64 ip, branch_from = 0;
struct branch_stack *lbr_stack;
struct branch_entry *entries;
int lbr_nr, j, k;
bool branch;
struct branch_flags *flags;
int mix_chain_nr;
for (i = 0; i < chain_nr; i++) { for (i = 0; i < chain_nr; i++) {
if (chain->ips[i] == PERF_CONTEXT_USER) if (chain->ips[i] == PERF_CONTEXT_USER)
...@@ -2215,71 +2221,68 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread, ...@@ -2215,71 +2221,68 @@ static int resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(struct thread *thread,
} }
/* LBR only affects the user callchain */ /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
if (i != chain_nr) { if (i == chain_nr)
struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack; return 0;
struct branch_entry *entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
int lbr_nr = lbr_stack->nr, j, k;
bool branch;
struct branch_flags *flags;
/*
* LBR callstack can only get user call chain.
* The mix_chain_nr is kernel call chain
* number plus LBR user call chain number.
* i is kernel call chain number,
* 1 is PERF_CONTEXT_USER,
* lbr_nr + 1 is the user call chain number.
* For details, please refer to the comments
* in callchain__printf
*/
int mix_chain_nr = i + 1 + lbr_nr + 1;
for (j = 0; j < mix_chain_nr; j++) {
int err;
branch = false;
flags = NULL;
if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE) { lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack;
if (j < i + 1) entries = perf_sample__branch_entries(sample);
ip = chain->ips[j]; lbr_nr = lbr_stack->nr;
else if (j > i + 1) { /*
k = j - i - 2; * LBR callstack can only get user call chain.
ip = entries[k].from; * The mix_chain_nr is kernel call chain
branch = true; * number plus LBR user call chain number.
flags = &entries[k].flags; * i is kernel call chain number,
} else { * 1 is PERF_CONTEXT_USER,
ip = entries[0].to; * lbr_nr + 1 is the user call chain number.
branch = true; * For details, please refer to the comments
flags = &entries[0].flags; * in callchain__printf
branch_from = entries[0].from; */
} mix_chain_nr = i + 1 + lbr_nr + 1;
for (j = 0; j < mix_chain_nr; j++) {
int err;
branch = false;
flags = NULL;
if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE) {
if (j < i + 1)
ip = chain->ips[j];
else if (j > i + 1) {
k = j - i - 2;
ip = entries[k].from;
branch = true;
flags = &entries[k].flags;
} else { } else {
if (j < lbr_nr) { ip = entries[0].to;
k = lbr_nr - j - 1; branch = true;
ip = entries[k].from; flags = &entries[0].flags;
branch = true; branch_from = entries[0].from;
flags = &entries[k].flags; }
} } else {
else if (j > lbr_nr) if (j < lbr_nr) {
ip = chain->ips[i + 1 - (j - lbr_nr)]; k = lbr_nr - j - 1;
else { ip = entries[k].from;
ip = entries[0].to; branch = true;
branch = true; flags = &entries[k].flags;
flags = &entries[0].flags; } else if (j > lbr_nr)
branch_from = entries[0].from; ip = chain->ips[i + 1 - (j - lbr_nr)];
} else {
ip = entries[0].to;
branch = true;
flags = &entries[0].flags;
branch_from = entries[0].from;
} }
err = add_callchain_ip(thread, cursor, parent,
root_al, &cpumode, ip,
branch, flags, NULL,
branch_from);
if (err)
return (err < 0) ? err : 0;
} }
return 1;
}
return 0; err = add_callchain_ip(thread, cursor, parent,
root_al, &cpumode, ip,
branch, flags, NULL,
branch_from);
if (err)
return (err < 0) ? err : 0;
}
return 1;
} }
static int find_prev_cpumode(struct ip_callchain *chain, struct thread *thread, static int find_prev_cpumode(struct ip_callchain *chain, struct thread *thread,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment