Commit f9d9ef62 authored by David Sterba's avatar David Sterba

btrfs: do not allow mounting non-subvolumes via subvol option

There's a missing test whether the path passed to subvol=path option
during mount is a real subvolume, allowing any directory located in
default subovlume to be passed and accepted for mount.

(current btrfs progs prevent this early)
$ btrfs subvol snapshot . p1-snap
ERROR: '.' is not a subvolume

(with "is subvolume?" test bypassed)
$ btrfs subvol snapshot . p1-snap
Create a snapshot of '.' in './p1-snap'

$ btrfs subvol list -p .
ID 258 parent 5 top level 5 path subvol
ID 259 parent 5 top level 5 path subvol1
ID 260 parent 5 top level 5 path default-subvol1
ID 262 parent 5 top level 5 path p1/p1-snapshot
ID 263 parent 259 top level 5 path subvol1/subvol1-snap

The problem I see is that this makes a false impression of snapshotting the
given subvolume but in fact snapshots the default one: a user expects outcome
like ID 263 but in fact gets ID 262 .

This patch makes mount fail with EINVAL with a message in syslog.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
parent 20bcd649
......@@ -740,6 +740,16 @@ static int btrfs_set_super(struct super_block *s, void *data)
return set_anon_super(s, data);
}
/*
* subvolumes are identified by ino 256
*/
static inline int is_subvolume_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
if (inode && inode->i_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
return 1;
return 0;
}
/*
* This will strip out the subvol=%s argument for an argument string and add
* subvolid=0 to make sure we get the actual tree root for path walking to the
......@@ -843,6 +853,15 @@ static struct dentry *mount_subvol(const char *subvol_name, int flags,
if (error)
return ERR_PTR(error);
if (!is_subvolume_inode(path.dentry->d_inode)) {
path_put(&path);
mntput(mnt);
error = -EINVAL;
printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: '%s' is not a valid subvolume\n",
subvol_name);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
/* Get a ref to the sb and the dentry we found and return it */
s = path.mnt->mnt_sb;
atomic_inc(&s->s_active);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment