Commit f9f74dc2 authored by Arnd Bergmann's avatar Arnd Bergmann Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm/shuffle: fix section mismatch warning

clang sometimes decides not to inline shuffle_zone(), but it calls a
__meminit function.  Without the extra __meminit annotation we get this
warning:

  WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x2a86d4): Section mismatch in reference from the function shuffle_zone() to the function .meminit.text:__shuffle_zone()
  The function shuffle_zone() references
  the function __meminit __shuffle_zone().
  This is often because shuffle_zone lacks a __meminit
  annotation or the annotation of __shuffle_zone is wrong.

shuffle_free_memory() did not show the same problem in my tests, but it
could happen in theory as well, so mark both as __meminit.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210514135952.2928094-1-arnd@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarNathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 4ff2473b
......@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(page_alloc_shuffle_key);
extern void __shuffle_free_memory(pg_data_t *pgdat);
extern bool shuffle_pick_tail(void);
static inline void shuffle_free_memory(pg_data_t *pgdat)
static inline void __meminit shuffle_free_memory(pg_data_t *pgdat)
{
if (!static_branch_unlikely(&page_alloc_shuffle_key))
return;
......@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static inline void shuffle_free_memory(pg_data_t *pgdat)
}
extern void __shuffle_zone(struct zone *z);
static inline void shuffle_zone(struct zone *z)
static inline void __meminit shuffle_zone(struct zone *z)
{
if (!static_branch_unlikely(&page_alloc_shuffle_key))
return;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment