Commit fa9a09f1 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915/execlists: Clear STOP_RING bit on reset

During reset, we try to ensure no forward progress of the CS prior to
the reset by setting the STOP_RING bit in RING_MI_MODE. Since gen9, this
register is context saved and do we end up in the odd situation where we
save the STOP_RING bit and so try to stop the engine again immediately
upon resume. This is quite unexpected and causes us to complain about an
early CS completion event!

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111514Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190910080208.4223-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent fd521d3b
......@@ -2368,6 +2368,17 @@ static struct i915_request *active_request(struct i915_request *rq)
return active;
}
static void __execlists_reset_reg_state(const struct intel_context *ce,
const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
u32 *regs = ce->lrc_reg_state;
if (INTEL_GEN(engine->i915) >= 9) {
regs[GEN9_CTX_RING_MI_MODE + 1] &= ~STOP_RING;
regs[GEN9_CTX_RING_MI_MODE + 1] |= STOP_RING << 16;
}
}
static void __execlists_reset(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, bool stalled)
{
struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
......@@ -2455,6 +2466,7 @@ static void __execlists_reset(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, bool stalled)
GEM_TRACE("%s replay {head:%04x, tail:%04x\n",
engine->name, ce->ring->head, ce->ring->tail);
intel_ring_update_space(ce->ring);
__execlists_reset_reg_state(ce, engine);
__execlists_update_reg_state(ce, engine);
mutex_release(&ce->pin_mutex.dep_map, 0, _THIS_IP_);
......
......@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
#define CTX_R_PWR_CLK_STATE 0x42
#define CTX_END 0x44
#define GEN9_CTX_RING_MI_MODE 0x54
/* GEN12+ Reg State Context */
#define GEN12_CTX_BB_PER_CTX_PTR 0x12
#define GEN12_CTX_LRI_HEADER_3 0x41
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment