Commit fddf8ba1 authored by Chang S. Bae's avatar Chang S. Bae Committed by Thomas Gleixner

x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing the FS/GS selector

When a ptracer writes a ptracee's FS/GSBASE with a different value, the
selector is also cleared. This behavior is not correct as the selector
should be preserved.

Update only the base value and leave the selector intact. To simplify the
code further remove the conditional checking for the same value as this
code is not performance critical.

The only recognizable downside of this change is when the selector is
already nonzero on write. The base will be reloaded according to the
selector. But the case is highly unexpected in real usages.

[ tglx: Massage changelog ]
Suggested-by: default avatarAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9040CFCD-74BD-4C17-9A01-B9B713CF6B10@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200528201402.1708239-2-sashal@kernel.org
parent b3a9e3b9
......@@ -379,25 +379,12 @@ static int putreg(struct task_struct *child,
case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct,fs_base):
if (value >= TASK_SIZE_MAX)
return -EIO;
/*
* When changing the FS base, use do_arch_prctl_64()
* to set the index to zero and to set the base
* as requested.
*
* NB: This behavior is nonsensical and likely needs to
* change when FSGSBASE support is added.
*/
if (child->thread.fsbase != value)
return do_arch_prctl_64(child, ARCH_SET_FS, value);
x86_fsbase_write_task(child, value);
return 0;
case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct,gs_base):
/*
* Exactly the same here as the %fs handling above.
*/
if (value >= TASK_SIZE_MAX)
return -EIO;
if (child->thread.gsbase != value)
return do_arch_prctl_64(child, ARCH_SET_GS, value);
x86_gsbase_write_task(child, value);
return 0;
#endif
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment