time: Explicitly use u32 instead of int for shift values
Ingo noted that using a u32 instead of int for shift values would be better to make sure the compiler doesn't unnecessarily use complex signed arithmetic. Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1342156917-25092-4-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment