Commit ff2b5509 authored by Ricardo Koller's avatar Ricardo Koller Committed by Marc Zyngier

KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add mix of tests into page_fault_test

Add some mix of tests into page_fault_test: memory regions with all the
pairwise combinations of read-only, userfaultfd, and dirty-logging.  For
example, writing into a read-only region which has a hole handled with
userfaultfd.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRicardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221017195834.2295901-15-ricarkol@google.com
parent 45acde40
......@@ -399,6 +399,12 @@ static void free_uffd(struct test_desc *test, struct uffd_desc *pt_uffd,
free(data_args.copy);
}
static int uffd_no_handler(int mode, int uffd, struct uffd_msg *msg)
{
TEST_FAIL("There was no UFFD fault expected.");
return -1;
}
/* Returns false if the test should be skipped. */
static bool punch_hole_in_backing_store(struct kvm_vm *vm,
struct userspace_mem_region *region)
......@@ -799,6 +805,22 @@ static void help(char *name)
.expected_events = { 0 }, \
}
#define TEST_UFFD_AND_DIRTY_LOG(_access, _with_af, _uffd_data_handler, \
_uffd_faults, _test_check) \
{ \
.name = SCAT3(uffd_and_dirty_log, _access, _with_af), \
.data_memslot_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES, \
.pt_memslot_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES, \
.guest_prepare = { _PREPARE(_with_af), \
_PREPARE(_access) }, \
.guest_test = _access, \
.mem_mark_cmd = CMD_HOLE_DATA | CMD_HOLE_PT, \
.guest_test_check = { _CHECK(_with_af), _test_check }, \
.uffd_data_handler = _uffd_data_handler, \
.uffd_pt_handler = uffd_pt_write_handler, \
.expected_events = { .uffd_faults = _uffd_faults, }, \
}
#define TEST_RO_MEMSLOT(_access, _mmio_handler, _mmio_exits) \
{ \
.name = SCAT3(ro_memslot, _access, _with_af), \
......@@ -818,6 +840,59 @@ static void help(char *name)
.expected_events = { .fail_vcpu_runs = 1 }, \
}
#define TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_DIRTY_LOG(_access, _mmio_handler, _mmio_exits, \
_test_check) \
{ \
.name = SCAT3(ro_memslot, _access, _with_af), \
.data_memslot_flags = KVM_MEM_READONLY | KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES, \
.pt_memslot_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES, \
.guest_prepare = { _PREPARE(_access) }, \
.guest_test = _access, \
.guest_test_check = { _test_check }, \
.mmio_handler = _mmio_handler, \
.expected_events = { .mmio_exits = _mmio_exits}, \
}
#define TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_NO_SYNDROME_AND_DIRTY_LOG(_access, _test_check) \
{ \
.name = SCAT2(ro_memslot_no_syn_and_dlog, _access), \
.data_memslot_flags = KVM_MEM_READONLY | KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES, \
.pt_memslot_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES, \
.guest_test = _access, \
.guest_test_check = { _test_check }, \
.fail_vcpu_run_handler = fail_vcpu_run_mmio_no_syndrome_handler, \
.expected_events = { .fail_vcpu_runs = 1 }, \
}
#define TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_UFFD(_access, _mmio_handler, _mmio_exits, \
_uffd_data_handler, _uffd_faults) \
{ \
.name = SCAT2(ro_memslot_uffd, _access), \
.data_memslot_flags = KVM_MEM_READONLY, \
.mem_mark_cmd = CMD_HOLE_DATA | CMD_HOLE_PT, \
.guest_prepare = { _PREPARE(_access) }, \
.guest_test = _access, \
.uffd_data_handler = _uffd_data_handler, \
.uffd_pt_handler = uffd_pt_write_handler, \
.mmio_handler = _mmio_handler, \
.expected_events = { .mmio_exits = _mmio_exits, \
.uffd_faults = _uffd_faults }, \
}
#define TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_NO_SYNDROME_AND_UFFD(_access, _uffd_data_handler, \
_uffd_faults) \
{ \
.name = SCAT2(ro_memslot_no_syndrome, _access), \
.data_memslot_flags = KVM_MEM_READONLY, \
.mem_mark_cmd = CMD_HOLE_DATA | CMD_HOLE_PT, \
.guest_test = _access, \
.uffd_data_handler = _uffd_data_handler, \
.uffd_pt_handler = uffd_pt_write_handler, \
.fail_vcpu_run_handler = fail_vcpu_run_mmio_no_syndrome_handler, \
.expected_events = { .fail_vcpu_runs = 1, \
.uffd_faults = _uffd_faults }, \
}
static struct test_desc tests[] = {
/* Check that HW is setting the Access Flag (AF) (sanity checks). */
......@@ -892,6 +967,35 @@ static struct test_desc tests[] = {
TEST_DIRTY_LOG(guest_dc_zva, with_af, guest_check_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_DIRTY_LOG(guest_st_preidx, with_af, guest_check_write_in_dirty_log),
/*
* Access when the data and PT memory regions are both marked for
* dirty logging and UFFD at the same time. The expected result is
* that writes should mark the dirty log and trigger a userfaultfd
* write fault. Reads/execs should result in a read userfaultfd
* fault, and nothing in the dirty log. Any S1PTW should result in
* a write in the dirty log and a userfaultfd write.
*/
TEST_UFFD_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_read64, with_af, uffd_data_read_handler, 2,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
/* no_af should also lead to a PT write. */
TEST_UFFD_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_read64, no_af, uffd_data_read_handler, 2,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_UFFD_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_ld_preidx, with_af, uffd_data_read_handler,
2, guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_UFFD_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_at, with_af, 0, 1,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_UFFD_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_exec, with_af, uffd_data_read_handler, 2,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_UFFD_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_write64, with_af, uffd_data_write_handler,
2, guest_check_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_UFFD_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_cas, with_af, uffd_data_read_handler, 2,
guest_check_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_UFFD_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_dc_zva, with_af, uffd_data_write_handler,
2, guest_check_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_UFFD_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_st_preidx, with_af,
uffd_data_write_handler, 2,
guest_check_write_in_dirty_log),
/*
* Try accesses when the data memory region is marked read-only
* (with KVM_MEM_READONLY). Writes with a syndrome result in an
......@@ -908,6 +1012,57 @@ static struct test_desc tests[] = {
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_NO_SYNDROME(guest_cas),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_NO_SYNDROME(guest_st_preidx),
/*
* Access when both the data region is both read-only and marked
* for dirty logging at the same time. The expected result is that
* for writes there should be no write in the dirty log. The
* readonly handling is the same as if the memslot was not marked
* for dirty logging: writes with a syndrome result in an MMIO
* exit, and writes with no syndrome result in a failed vcpu run.
*/
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_read64, 0, 0,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_ld_preidx, 0, 0,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_at, 0, 0,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_exec, 0, 0,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_write64, mmio_on_test_gpa_handler,
1, guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_NO_SYNDROME_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_dc_zva,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_NO_SYNDROME_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_cas,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_NO_SYNDROME_AND_DIRTY_LOG(guest_st_preidx,
guest_check_no_write_in_dirty_log),
/*
* Access when the data region is both read-only and punched with
* holes tracked with userfaultfd. The expected result is the
* union of both userfaultfd and read-only behaviors. For example,
* write accesses result in a userfaultfd write fault and an MMIO
* exit. Writes with no syndrome result in a failed vcpu run and
* no userfaultfd write fault. Reads result in userfaultfd getting
* triggered.
*/
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_UFFD(guest_read64, 0, 0,
uffd_data_read_handler, 2),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_UFFD(guest_ld_preidx, 0, 0,
uffd_data_read_handler, 2),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_UFFD(guest_at, 0, 0,
uffd_no_handler, 1),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_UFFD(guest_exec, 0, 0,
uffd_data_read_handler, 2),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_AND_UFFD(guest_write64, mmio_on_test_gpa_handler, 1,
uffd_data_write_handler, 2),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_NO_SYNDROME_AND_UFFD(guest_cas,
uffd_data_read_handler, 2),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_NO_SYNDROME_AND_UFFD(guest_dc_zva,
uffd_no_handler, 1),
TEST_RO_MEMSLOT_NO_SYNDROME_AND_UFFD(guest_st_preidx,
uffd_no_handler, 1),
{ 0 }
};
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment