- 22 Aug, 2019 8 commits
-
-
Vitaly Kuznetsov authored
To avoid hardcoding xsetbv length to '3' we need to support decoding it in the emulator. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Vitaly Kuznetsov authored
When doing x86_emulate_instruction(EMULTYPE_SKIP) interrupt shadow has to be cleared if and only if the skipping is successful. There are two immediate issues: - In SVM skip_emulated_instruction() we are not zapping interrupt shadow in case kvm_emulate_instruction(EMULTYPE_SKIP) is used to advance RIP (!nrpip_save). - In VMX handle_ept_misconfig() when running as a nested hypervisor we (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR) case) forget to clear interrupt shadow. Note that we intentionally don't handle the case when the skipped instruction is supposed to prolong the interrupt shadow ("MOV/POP SS") as skip-emulation of those instructions should not happen under normal circumstances. Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Vitaly Kuznetsov authored
On AMD, kvm_x86_ops->skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu) can, in theory, fail: in !nrips case we call kvm_emulate_instruction(EMULTYPE_SKIP). Currently, we only do printk(KERN_DEBUG) when this happens and this is not ideal. Propagate the error up the stack. On VMX, skip_emulated_instruction() doesn't fail, we have two call sites calling it explicitly: handle_exception_nmi() and handle_task_switch(), we can just ignore the result. On SVM, we also have two explicit call sites: svm_queue_exception() and it seems we don't need to do anything there as we check if RIP was advanced or not. In task_switch_interception(), however, we are better off not proceeding to kvm_task_switch() in case skip_emulated_instruction() failed. Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Vitaly Kuznetsov authored
svm->next_rip is only used by skip_emulated_instruction() and in case kvm_set_msr() fails we rightfully don't do that. Move svm->next_rip advancement to 'else' branch to avoid creating false impression that it's always advanced (and make it look like rdmsr_interception()). This is a preparatory change to removing hardcoded RIP advancement from instruction intercepts, no functional change. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Sean Christopherson authored
Jump to the common error handling in x86_decode_insn() if __do_insn_fetch_bytes() fails so that its error code is converted to the appropriate return type. Although the various helpers used by x86_decode_insn() return X86EMUL_* values, x86_decode_insn() itself returns EMULATION_FAILED or EMULATION_OK. This doesn't cause a functional issue as the sole caller, x86_emulate_instruction(), currently only cares about success vs. failure, and success is indicated by '0' for both types (X86EMUL_CONTINUE and EMULATION_OK). Fixes: 285ca9e9 ("KVM: emulate: speed up do_insn_fetch") Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
Similar to AMD bits, set the Intel bits from the vendor-independent feature and bug flags, because KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID does not care about the vendor and they should be set on AMD processors as well. Suggested-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
Even though it is preferrable to use SPEC_CTRL (represented by X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD) instead of VIRT_SPEC, VIRT_SPEC is always supported anyway because otherwise it would be impossible to migrate from old to new CPUs. Make this apparent in the result of KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID as well. However, we need to hide the bit on Intel processors, so move the setting to svm_set_supported_cpuid. Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Reported-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
The AMD_* bits have to be set from the vendor-independent feature and bug flags, because KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID does not care about the vendor and they should be set on Intel processors as well. On top of this, SSBD, STIBP and AMD_SSB_NO bit were not set, and VIRT_SSBD does not have to be added manually because it is a cpufeature that comes directly from the host's CPUID bit. Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 21 Aug, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Vitaly Kuznetsov authored
test_msr_platform_info_disabled() generates EXIT_SHUTDOWN but VMCB state is undefined after that so an attempt to launch this guest again from test_msr_platform_info_enabled() fails. Reorder the tests to make test pass. Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
This reverts commit 4e103134. Alex Williamson reported regressions with device assignment with this patch. Even though the bug is probably elsewhere and still latent, this is needed to fix the regression. Fixes: 4e103134 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Zap only the relevant pages when removing a memslot", 2019-02-05) Reported-by: Alex Willamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
state_test and smm_test are failing on older processors that do not have xcr0. This is because on those processor KVM does provide support for KVM_GET/SET_XSAVE (to avoid having to rely on the older KVM_GET/SET_FPU) but not for KVM_GET/SET_XCRS. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 15 Aug, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
vmx_set_nested_state_test is trying to use the KVM_STATE_NESTED_EVMCS without enabling enlightened VMCS first. Correct the outcome of the test, and actually test that it succeeds after the capability is enabled. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
There are two tests already enabling eVMCS and a third is coming. Add a function that enables the capability and tests the result. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
This test is only covering various edge cases of the KVM_SET_NESTED_STATE ioctl. Running the VM does not really add anything. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 14 Aug, 2019 4 commits
-
-
Miaohe Lin authored
new_entry is reassigned a new value next line. So it's redundant and remove it. Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
This is probably overdue---KVM x86 has quite a few contributors that usually review each other's patches, which is really helpful to me. Formalize this by listing them as reviewers. I am including people with various expertise: - Joerg for SVM (with designated reviewers, it makes more sense to have him in the main KVM/x86 stanza) - Sean for MMU and VMX - Jim for VMX - Vitaly for Hyper-V and possibly SVM - Wanpeng for LAPIC and paravirtualization. Please ack if you are okay with this arrangement, otherwise speak up. In other news, Radim is going to leave Red Hat soon. However, he has not been very much involved in upstream KVM development for some time, and in the immediate future he is still going to help maintain kvm/queue while I am on vacation. Since not much is going to change, I will let him decide whether he wants to keep the maintainer role after he leaves. Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Acked-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Acked-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
KVM/s390 does not have a list of its own, and linux-s390 is in the loop anyway thanks to the generic arch/s390 match. So use the generic KVM list for s390 patches. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Radim Krcmar authored
recalculate_apic_map does not santize ldr and it's possible that multiple bits are set. In that case, a previous valid entry can potentially be overwritten by an invalid one. This condition is hit when booting a 32 bit, >8 CPU, RHEL6 guest and then triggering a crash to boot a kdump kernel. This is the sequence of events: 1. Linux boots in bigsmp mode and enables PhysFlat, however, it still writes to the LDR which probably will never be used. 2. However, when booting into kdump, the stale LDR values remain as they are not cleared by the guest and there isn't a apic reset. 3. kdump boots with 1 cpu, and uses Logical Destination Mode but the logical map has been overwritten and points to an inactive vcpu. Signed-off-by: Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 09 Aug, 2019 8 commits
-
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
Merge tag 'kvmarm-fixes-for-5.3-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm fixes for 5.3, take #2 - Fix our system register reset so that we stop writing non-sensical values to them, and track which registers get reset instead. - Sync VMCR back from the GIC on WFI so that KVM has an exact vue of PMR. - Reevaluate state of HW-mapped, level triggered interrupts on enable.
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
Merge tag 'kvmarm-fixes-for-5.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm fixes for 5.3 - A bunch of switch/case fall-through annotation, fixing one actual bug - Fix PMU reset bug - Add missing exception class debug strings
-
Naresh Kamboju authored
selftests kvm test cases need pre-required kernel configs for the test to get pass. Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Thomas Huth authored
The kvm_create_max_vcpus test has been moved to the main directory, and sync_regs_test is now available on s390x, too. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
The same check is already done in kvm_is_reserved_pfn. Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Alexandru Elisei authored
A HW mapped level sensitive interrupt asserted by a device will not be put into the ap_list if it is disabled at the VGIC level. When it is enabled again, it will be inserted into the ap_list and written to a list register on guest entry regardless of the state of the device. We could argue that this can also happen on real hardware, when the command to enable the interrupt reached the GIC before the device had the chance to de-assert the interrupt signal; however, we emulate the distributor and redistributors in software and we can do better than that. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
Marc Zyngier authored
At the moment, the way we reset CP15 registers is mildly insane: We write junk to them, call the reset functions, and then check that we have something else in them. The "fun" thing is that this can happen while the guest is running (PSCI, for example). If anything in KVM has to evaluate the state of a CP15 register while junk is in there, bad thing may happen. Let's stop doing that. Instead, we track that we have called a reset function for that register, and assume that the reset function has done something. In the end, the very need of this reset check is pretty dubious, as it doesn't check everything (a lot of the CP15 reg leave outside of the cp15_regs[] array). It may well be axed in the near future. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
Marc Zyngier authored
At the moment, the way we reset system registers is mildly insane: We write junk to them, call the reset functions, and then check that we have something else in them. The "fun" thing is that this can happen while the guest is running (PSCI, for example). If anything in KVM has to evaluate the state of a system register while junk is in there, bad thing may happen. Let's stop doing that. Instead, we track that we have called a reset function for that register, and assume that the reset function has done something. This requires fixing a couple of sysreg refinition in the trap table. In the end, the very need of this reset check is pretty dubious, as it doesn't check everything (a lot of the sysregs leave outside of the sys_regs[] array). It may well be axed in the near future. Tested-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
- 05 Aug, 2019 7 commits
-
-
Marc Zyngier authored
Since commit commit 328e5664 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Defer touching GICH_VMCR to vcpu_load/put"), we leave ICH_VMCR_EL2 (or its GICv2 equivalent) loaded as long as we can, only syncing it back when we're scheduled out. There is a small snag with that though: kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(), which is indirectly called from kvm_vcpu_check_block(), needs to evaluate the guest's view of ICC_PMR_EL1. At the point were we call kvm_vcpu_check_block(), the vcpu is still loaded, and whatever changes to PMR is not visible in memory until we do a vcpu_put(). Things go really south if the guest does the following: mov x0, #0 // or any small value masking interrupts msr ICC_PMR_EL1, x0 [vcpu preempted, then rescheduled, VMCR sampled] mov x0, #ff // allow all interrupts msr ICC_PMR_EL1, x0 wfi // traps to EL2, so samping of VMCR [interrupt arrives just after WFI] Here, the hypervisor's view of PMR is zero, while the guest has enabled its interrupts. kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq() will then say that no interrupts are pending (despite an interrupt being received) and we'll block for no reason. If the guest doesn't have a periodic interrupt firing once it has blocked, it will stay there forever. To avoid this unfortuante situation, let's resync VMCR from kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(), ensuring that a following kvm_vcpu_check_block() will observe the latest value of PMR. This has been found by booting an arm64 Linux guest with the pseudo NMI feature, and thus using interrupt priorities to mask interrupts instead of the usual PSTATE masking. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.12 Fixes: 328e5664 ("KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Defer touching GICH_VMCR to vcpu_load/put") Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
Most code in arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c is called through x86_hyper_kvm, and thus only runs if KVM has been detected. There is no need to check again for the CPUID base. Cc: Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Greg KH authored
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Also, when doing this, change kvm_arch_create_vcpu_debugfs() to return void instead of an integer, as we should not care at all about if this function actually does anything or not. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: <x86@kernel.org> Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Paolo Bonzini authored
There is no need for this function as all arches have to implement kvm_arch_create_vcpu_debugfs() no matter what. A #define symbol let us actually simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Wanpeng Li authored
After commit d73eb57b (KVM: Boost vCPUs that are delivering interrupts), a five years old bug is exposed. Running ebizzy benchmark in three 80 vCPUs VMs on one 80 pCPUs Skylake server, a lot of rcu_sched stall warning splatting in the VMs after stress testing: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 4 41 57 62 77} (detected by 15, t=60004 jiffies, g=899, c=898, q=15073) Call Trace: flush_tlb_mm_range+0x68/0x140 tlb_flush_mmu.part.75+0x37/0xe0 tlb_finish_mmu+0x55/0x60 zap_page_range+0x142/0x190 SyS_madvise+0x3cd/0x9c0 system_call_fastpath+0x1c/0x21 swait_active() sustains to be true before finish_swait() is called in kvm_vcpu_block(), voluntarily preempted vCPUs are taken into account by kvm_vcpu_on_spin() loop greatly increases the probability condition kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu) is checked and can be true, when APICv is enabled the yield-candidate vCPU's VMCS RVI field leaks(by vmx_sync_pir_to_irr()) into spinning-on-a-taken-lock vCPU's current VMCS. This patch fixes it by checking conservatively a subset of events. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 98f4a146 (KVM: add kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() test to kvm_vcpu_on_spin() loop) Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Wanpeng Li authored
preempted_in_kernel is updated in preempt_notifier when involuntary preemption ocurrs, it can be stale when the voluntarily preempted vCPUs are taken into account by kvm_vcpu_on_spin() loop. This patch lets it just check preempted_in_kernel for involuntary preemption. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Wanpeng Li authored
kvm_set_pending_timer() will take care to wake up the sleeping vCPU which has pending timer, don't need to check this in apic_timer_expired() again. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 29 Jul, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Anders Roxell authored
When fall-through warnings was enabled by default the following warnings was starting to show up: ../arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c: In function ‘__debug_save_state’: ../arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c:20:19: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] case 15: ptr[15] = read_debug(reg, 15); \ ../arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c:113:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘save_debug’ save_debug(dbg->dbg_bcr, dbgbcr, brps); ^~~~~~~~~~ ../arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c:21:2: note: here case 14: ptr[14] = read_debug(reg, 14); \ ^~~~ ../arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c:113:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘save_debug’ save_debug(dbg->dbg_bcr, dbgbcr, brps); ^~~~~~~~~~ ../arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c:21:19: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] case 14: ptr[14] = read_debug(reg, 14); \ ../arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c:113:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘save_debug’ save_debug(dbg->dbg_bcr, dbgbcr, brps); ^~~~~~~~~~ ../arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c:22:2: note: here case 13: ptr[13] = read_debug(reg, 13); \ ^~~~ ../arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/debug-sr.c:113:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘save_debug’ save_debug(dbg->dbg_bcr, dbgbcr, brps); ^~~~~~~~~~ Rework to add a 'Fall through' comment where the compiler warned about fall-through, hence silencing the warning. Fixes: d93512ef0f0e ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning") Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> [maz: fixed commit message] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
- 26 Jul, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Zenghui Yu authored
We've added two ESR exception classes for new ARM hardware extensions: ESR_ELx_EC_PAC and ESR_ELx_EC_SVE, but failed to update the strings used in tracing and other debug. Let's update "kvm_arm_exception_class" for these two EC, which the new EC will be visible to user-space via kvm_exit trace events Also update to "esr_class_str" for ESR_ELx_EC_PAC, by which we can get more readable debug info. Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
Anders Roxell authored
When fall-through warnings was enabled by default the following warnings was starting to show up: ../virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c: In function ‘__vgic_v3_save_aprs’: ../virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c:351:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[2] = __vgic_v3_read_ap0rn(2); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c:352:2: note: here case 6: ^~~~ ../virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c:353:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[1] = __vgic_v3_read_ap0rn(1); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c:354:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ Rework so that the compiler doesn't warn about fall-through. Fixes: d93512ef0f0e ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning") Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
Anders Roxell authored
When fall-through warnings was enabled by default, commit d93512ef0f0e ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning"), the following warnings was starting to show up: In file included from ../arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h:19, from ../arch/arm64/kvm/regmap.c:13: ../arch/arm64/kvm/regmap.c: In function ‘vcpu_write_spsr32’: ../arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h:31:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(__msr_s(r##nvh, "%x0"), \ ^~~ ../arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h:46:31: note: in expansion of macro ‘write_sysreg_elx’ #define write_sysreg_el1(v,r) write_sysreg_elx(v, r, _EL1, _EL12) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../arch/arm64/kvm/regmap.c:180:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘write_sysreg_el1’ write_sysreg_el1(v, SYS_SPSR); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../arch/arm64/kvm/regmap.c:181:2: note: here case KVM_SPSR_ABT: ^~~~ In file included from ../arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h:132, from ../arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h:8, from ../include/linux/cache.h:6, from ../include/linux/printk.h:9, from ../include/linux/kernel.h:15, from ../include/asm-generic/bug.h:18, from ../arch/arm64/include/asm/bug.h:26, from ../include/linux/bug.h:5, from ../include/linux/mmdebug.h:5, from ../include/linux/mm.h:9, from ../arch/arm64/kvm/regmap.c:11: ../arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h:837:2: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] asm volatile("msr " __stringify(r) ", %x0" \ ^~~ ../arch/arm64/kvm/regmap.c:182:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘write_sysreg’ write_sysreg(v, spsr_abt); ^~~~~~~~~~~~ ../arch/arm64/kvm/regmap.c:183:2: note: here case KVM_SPSR_UND: ^~~~ Rework to add a 'break;' in the swich-case since it didn't have that, leading to an interresting set of bugs. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.17+ Fixes: a8928195 ("KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle deferred save/restore of 32-bit registers") Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> [maz: reworked commit message, fixed stable range] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
- 24 Jul, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Wanpeng Li authored
Commit 11752adb (locking/pvqspinlock: Implement hybrid PV queued/unfair locks) introduces hybrid PV queued/unfair locks - queued mode (no starvation) - unfair mode (good performance on not heavily contended lock) The lock waiter goes into the unfair mode especially in VMs with over-commit vCPUs since increaing over-commitment increase the likehood that the queue head vCPU may have been preempted and not actively spinning. However, reschedule queue head vCPU timely to acquire the lock still can get better performance than just depending on lock stealing in over-subscribe scenario. Testing on 80 HT 2 socket Xeon Skylake server, with 80 vCPUs VM 80GB RAM: ebizzy -M vanilla boosting improved 1VM 23520 25040 6% 2VM 8000 13600 70% 3VM 3100 5400 74% The lock holder vCPU yields to the queue head vCPU when unlock, to boost queue head vCPU which is involuntary preemption or the one which is voluntary halt due to fail to acquire the lock after a short spin in the guest. Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Renaming docs seems to be en vogue at the moment, so fix on of the grossly misnamed directories. We usually never use "virtual" as a shortcut for virtualization in the kernel, but always virt, as seen in the virt/ top-level directory. Fix up the documentation to match that. Fixes: ed16648e ("Move kvm, uml, and lguest subdirectories under a common "virtual" directory, I.E:") Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
-
- 23 Jul, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Zenghui Yu authored
We use "pmc->idx" and the "chained" bitmap to determine if the pmc is chained, in kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(). But idx might be uninitialized (and random) when we doing this decision, through a KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT ioctl -> kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(). And the test_bit() against this random idx will potentially hit a KASAN BUG [1]. In general, idx is the static property of a PMU counter that is not expected to be modified across resets, as suggested by Julien. It looks more reasonable if we can setup the PMU counter idx for a vcpu in its creation time. Introduce a new function - kvm_pmu_vcpu_init() for this basic setup. Oh, and the KASAN BUG will get fixed this way. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg36700.html Fixes: 80f393a2 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Support chained PMU counters") Suggested-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> Suggested-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Acked-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-