This value was found on an ASRock X670E Taichi with an
NCT6686D chip.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Koskovich <akoskovich@pm.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023182442.21943-1-akoskovich@pm.meSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Do not allow setting shunt resistor to 0. This results in a division by
zero when performing current value computations based on input voltages
and connected resistor values.
Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231011135754.13508-1-antoniu.miclaus@analog.comSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

npcm7xx_pwm_config_set() can return '-ENODEV' for failed. So check
the value of 'ret' after calling npcm7xx_pwm_config_set().
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@nfschina.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020085518.198477-1-suhui@nfschina.comSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Currently the local variable hum is being divided by a constant and
the results is being re-assigned back to hum before the value is being
returned to the caller. The assignment to hum is redundant and can
be removed.

Cleans up clang scan build warning:
drivers/hwmon/hs3001.c:65:9: warning: Although the value stored to 'hum'
is used in the enclosing expression, the value is never actually read
from 'hum' [deadcode.DeadStores]
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023135828.667297-1-colin.i.king@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Convert manual _UID references to use the standard ACPI helper.
Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024062018.23839-6-raag.jadav@intel.comSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Add support for the ADT7490's Imon voltage readout. It is handled
largely the same way as the existing Vtt readout.
Signed-off-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com>
Co-developed-by: Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@raptorengineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@raptorengineering.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914223947.829025-1-tpearson@raptorengineering.comSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The KM002C is similar to the KM003C and seems to use the same
protocol and firmware.
Reported-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/290ebce4-54f0-8ac1-2a13-cbc806d80d64@interlog.com/Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230911-powerz-km002c-v1-1-898bd79b9bae@weissschuh.netSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-25-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-24-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-23-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-22-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-21-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-16-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-15-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() is renamed to .remove().

Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The two drivers compile fine on arm64, powerpc, m68k and s390. So make
it possible to enable the drivers in the presence of COMPILE_TEST.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230918085951.1234172-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The values of the limit registers affect the fan speed in a
particular way. Document this behaviour so that future users
can exploit it if required.
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907052639.16491-6-W_Armin@gmx.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

After some testing on a Fujitsu Esprimo P720, it turned out that
the limit registers are indeed writable and affect the fan control
algorithm. This is supported by the datasheet, which says that the
fan control functions are based on the limit and parameter registers.
Since accessing those registers is very inefficient, the existing
regmap cache is used to cache those registers values.

Tested on a Fujitsu Esprimo P720.
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907052639.16491-5-W_Armin@gmx.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Accessing virtual registers is very inefficient, so pwm map values
should be cached when possible, else userspace could effectively do
a DOS attack by reading pwm map values in a while loop.
Use the regmap cache to cache those values.

Tested on a Fujitsu Esprimo P720.
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907052639.16491-4-W_Armin@gmx.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

When the lock bit inside SCH5627_REG_CTRL is set, then the virtual
registers become read-only until the next power cycle.
Disallow write access to those registers in such a case.

Tested on a Fujitsu Esprimo P720.

Fixes: aa9f833d ("hwmon: (sch5627) Add pwmX_auto_channels_temp support")
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907052639.16491-3-W_Armin@gmx.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Use bit macros then accessing SCH5627_REG_CTRL, so that people
do not need to look at the datasheet to find out what each bit
does.

Tested on a Fujitsu Esprimo P720.
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907052639.16491-2-W_Armin@gmx.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Simplify tmp51x_read_properties() by replacing 'nfactor' ->'data->nfactor'
in device_property_read_u32_array() and drop the local variable as it is
unused.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907071404.24334-3-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.comSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

The tmp512 chip has 3 channels whereas tmp513 has 4 channels. Avoid
using tmp51x_ids for this HW difference by replacing OF/ID table
data with maximum channels supported by the device.

Replace id->max_channels variable from struct tmp51x_data and drop the
macros TMP51{2,3}_TEMP_CONFIG_DEFAULT as it can be derived from the macro
TMP51X_TEMP_CONFIG_DEFAULT and update the logic in tmp51x_is_visible(),
tmp51x_read_properties() and tmp51x_init() using max_channels.

While at it, drop enum tmp51x_ids as there is no user and remove
trailing comma in the terminator entry for OF table.
Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907071404.24334-2-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.comSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

TDA38640 can operate in either PMBus mode or SVID mode.

In SVID mode, by design ENABLE pin is the only option for controlling
the output rail i.e., ENABLE pin is chained to power good of another
reglator & FPGA.

In cases where the chip is configured for SVID mode, and the ENABLE pin
is set at a fixed level or is left unconnected (with an internal
pull-down), while requiring software control, the following
workaround is necessary.

The workaround utilizes ENABLE pin polarity flipping to control
output rail.

If property 'infineon,en-pin-fixed-level' is specified then
determine if chip is in SVID mode by checking BIT15 of MTP memory offset
0x44 as described in the datasheet.

If chip is in SVID mode then apply the workaround by
1. Determine EN pin level
2. Maps BIT7 of OPERATION(01h) to EN_PIN_POLARITY(BIT1) of
   PB_ON_OFF_CONFIG.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230831190731.265099-3-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com
[groeck: Dropped unnecessary line continuation]
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Add bits found in the ON_OFF_CONFIG register.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@9elements.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230831190731.265099-2-Naresh.Solanki@9elements.comSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>