- 11 Apr, 2023 40 commits
-
-
Niklas Söderlund authored
If the pattern generator is enabled the device shall not be queried for timings. Instead the timings programmed shall be reported as they are the ones being used to generate the pattern. Before this change an external HDMI source needed to be connected for the pattern generator to work. The driver would query this external HDMI source for timings and program the pattern generator using those. With this change the user can control the timings and have the pattern generator work without the need of an external HDMI source being connected. Signed-off-by:
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> Signed-off-by:
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
-
Niklas Söderlund authored
When initializing the HDMI block during probe an initial set of timings are selected. These timings are stored in the drivers private data, but not written to the device. This in itself is not bad, but in s_dv_timings() the timings stored in the drivers private data are compared to the new timings, if they match no action is taken. This creates the corner-case where the timing selected at initialization is the first timings a user want to use as the driver then never writes it to the device preventing proper operation. Fix this by writing the timings to the device at initialization in addition to storing them in the drivers private data. Signed-off-by:
-
Niklas Söderlund authored
The loop to match the requested timings with the ones supported by the driver is incorrect. It always iterates thru the whole array of supported modes. The bounds check after the loop always triggers resulting in adv748x_hdmi_set_video_timings() always returning -EINVAL. Fix this by correcting the lookup to break the loop when a match is found. Signed-off-by:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Signed-off-by:
-
Milen Mitkov authored
Use the multistream series function video_device_pipeline_alloc_start to allows multiple clients of the same pipeline. If the VFE entity is used by another instance of the pipeline, the pipeline won't be stopped. This allows for stopping and starting streams at any point without disrupting the other running streams. To prepare and start multiple virtual channels each CSID source pad corresponding to a virtual channel must be linked to the corresponding IFE entity. CSID pad 1 (1st source pad) corresponds to virtual channel 0, CSID pad 2 corresponds to virtual channel 1 and so on. Each of these must be linked to corresponding IFE RDI port. E.g. to enable vc 0 on CSID0: media-ctl -l '"msm_csid0":1->"msm_vfe0_rdi0":0[1]' To enable vc1 on CSID0: media-ctl -l '"msm_csid0":2->"msm_vfe0_rdi1":0[1]' And so on. Note that on SM8250 each CSID is connected, at the hardware level, to only one IFE. Thus, you must link CSID0 with IFE0, you can't link it with IFE1. Example: the following media controller setup expects multiplexed sensor data on CSIPHY2. Data will be passed on to CSID0, which will demux it to 2 streams - for RDI0 and RD1 ports of IFE0: media-ctl -v -d /dev/media0 -V '"imx577 '22-001a'":0[fmt:SRGGB10/3840x2160 field:none]' media-ctl -V '"msm_csiphy2":0[fmt:SRGGB10/3840x2160]' media-ctl -V '"msm_csid0":0[fmt:SRGGB10/3840x2160]' media-ctl -V '"msm_csid0":1[fmt:SRGGB10/3840x2160]' media-ctl -V '"msm_csid0":2[fmt:SRGGB10/3840x2160]' media-ctl -V '"msm_vfe0_rdi0":0[fmt:SRGGB10/3840x2160]' media-ctl -V '"msm_vfe0_rdi1":0[fmt:SRGGB10/3840x2160]' media-ctl -l '"msm_csiphy2":1->"msm_csid0":0[1]' media-ctl -l '"msm_csid0":1->"msm_vfe0_rdi0":0[1]' media-ctl -l '"msm_csid0":2->"msm_vfe0_rdi1":0[1]' Note: CSID's entity pad 0 is a sink pad, pads 1..4 are source pads To start streaming a v4l2 client must open the corresponding /dev/videoN node. For example, with yavta: yavta -B capture-mplane -c -I -n 5 -f SRGGB10P -s 3840x2160 -F /dev/video0 yavta -B capture-mplane -c -I -n 5 -f SRGGB10P -s 3840x2160 -F /dev/video1 Note that IFEs (vfe0, vfe1) on SM8250 have 3 RDI ports and a single PIX port and IFELites (vfe2, vfe3) have 4 RDI ports and no PIX port. Signed-off-by:
Milen Mitkov <quic_mmitkov@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by:
Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org> Tested-by:
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> Acked-by:
-
Milen Mitkov authored
On SM8250 each VFE supports at least 3 RDI channels, or 4 in case of VFE-Lite, so add appropriate IRQ setup and handling. Signed-off-by:
-
Milen Mitkov authored
For multiple virtual channels support, each VFE line can be in either ON, RESERVED or OFF states. This allows the starting and stopping of a VFE line independently of other active VFE lines (e.g. already- running lines stay in ON state, and newly-added lines are RESERVED) Also, link the CSID entity's source ports to corresponding VFE lines. Signed-off-by:
-
Milen Mitkov authored
CSID hardware on SM8250 can demux up to 4 simultaneous streams based on virtual channel (vc) or datatype (dt). The CSID subdevice entity now has 4 source ports that can be enabled/disabled and thus can control which virtual channels are enabled. Datatype demuxing not tested. In order to keep a valid internal state of the subdevice, implicit format propagation from the sink to the source pads has been preserved. However, the format on each source pad can be different and in that case it must be configured explicitly. CSID's s_stream is called when any stream is started or stopped. It will call configure_streams() that will rewrite IRQ settings to HW. When multiple streams are running simultaneously there is an issue when writing IRQ settings for one stream while another is still running, thus avoid re-writing settings if they were not changed in link setup, or by fully powering off the CSID hardware. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by:
-
