- 15 Nov, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
Implement a skeleton for the uevent framework, to be filled in later when we figure out what type of module "matching" we want to do for things (connections, interfaces, modules, etc.) Based on a patch from Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
-
- 14 Nov, 2014 34 commits
-
-
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
This reverts commit 4d1529e6687d53878b71cdcd646e28e10d62c2e8. Alex reports that this causes problems. Signed-off-by: -
Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
This reverts commit b8ba855506906de71df5b12b50cdbbf7259a930c. needed to revert an older change. Signed-off-by: -
Viresh Kumar authored
That's where it belong to. Also rename it in a similar way to: gb_interface_create() and gb_interface_destroy(). Signed-off-by:
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Some of module specific routines were present in core.c instead of module.c. Move them to the right place. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Also fix print message. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Though this doesn't cause any logical issues as far as the behavior of the routine is concerned as the local variable would be considered inside the 'while' loop. But its better not to use the same name for variables at different levels. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Just an extra check to make sure the list isn't corrupted. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Suggested-by:
Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Most of the attribute routines are created with gb_module_attr() and few are left out because they weren't printing 32 bit hexadecimal values. Extend gb_module_attr() to cover more cases. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Also fix indentation. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Parent objects of 'dev' are allocated with kzalloc() and so all of their fields are initialized with 0. Hence no need of marking them NULL again. Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Viresh Kumar authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Matt Porter authored
Remove some leftover cruft from recent refactoring of connection handlers. Signed-off-by:
Matt Porter <mporter@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Alex Elder authored
When an incoming request is received, the operation type is encoded in the header and is not available in the payload. Add the operation type as a parameter to the request_recv method so the request handler knows what to do. Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Alex Elder authored
We can update a connection's operation id counter under spinlock, and thereby avoid the need to maintain it in an atomic variable. Signed-off-by:
-
Alex Elder authored
Greg raised the alarm when I first put in the red-black tree for tracking pending operations. The reality as that we're not likely to have that many operations in flight at any one time, so the complexity of the red-black tree is most likely unwarranted. I already This pulls out the red-black tree and uses a simple list instead. A connection maintains two lists of operations. An operation starts on its connection's operations list. It is moved to the pending list when its request message is sent. And it is moved back to the operations list when the response message arrives. It is removed from whatever list it's in when the operation is destroyed. We reuse the single operation->links field for both lists. Only outgoing requests are ever "pending." Incoming requests are transient--we receive them, process them, send the response, and then we're done. Change a few function names so it's clear we're working with the pending list. Signed-off-by:
-
Alex Elder authored
Currently, gb_operation_insert() arranges to time out a request if it takes too long. Move this out of that function and into gb_operation_request_send(), so we know it's getting set up after the request has actually be sent. Signed-off-by:
-
Alex Elder authored
This commit changed the timeout behavior for operations: 6a8732e operation: make the timeout a per-operation thing... It unfortunately left in place some code that was only appropriate for per-connection timeouts. In particular, the timer for an operation is currently getting started only if no existing operations are in flight. Fix that oversight, and schedule an operation's timer unconditionally. Signed-off-by: -
Alex Elder authored
The buffers allocated for CPort URBS are ES1_GBUF_MSG_SIZE bytes. But usb_fill_bulk_urb() passes PAGE_SIZE as its size. They happen to be the same, but the code is wrong, so fix it. Signed-off-by:
-
Matt Porter authored
Add a PWM driver that implements the Greybus PWM protocol. Signed-off-by:
-
- 06 Nov, 2014 5 commits
-
-
Alex Elder authored
The gbuf complete method is a callback that allows the creator of a gbuf to know when all processing on a gbuf is done. We now only ever allocate gbufs for use in Greybus operations, and in that case we only ever supply gb_operation_gbuf_complete() as the completion callback. Furthermore, the only place gbuf->complete() is called is in gb_operation_recv_work(). Knowing this, we can just call gb_operation_gbuf_complete() directly from gb_operation_recv_work(), and get rid of the gbuf->complete() method entirely. Signed-off-by:
-
Alex Elder authored
Simple move of a block of code, done as a separate commit to make it easier to see that's all that's going on. Signed-off-by:
-
Alex Elder authored
All greybus_gbuf_finished() does is call the gbuf's complete method. Currently, greybus_gbuf_finished() is only ever called in one place, and that place can call the complete method directly instead. That allows us to eliminate greybus_gbuf_finished(). Signed-off-by:
-
Alex Elder authored
A gbuf now records a pointer to its operation. The only thing ever stored in a gbuf context pointer is the gbuf's operation. Therefore there's no longer any need to maintain the context pointer, so get rid of it. Signed-off-by:
-
Alex Elder authored
Currently a gbuf records a pointer to the connection it's associated with. We now know only use gbufs in operation messages, so we can point a gbuf at its operation instead. This still gives access to the connection where needed, but it also will provide all the context we'll ever need for a gbuf, and this allows us (in the next patch) to remove the gbuf->context field as well. So switch to recording in a gbuf the operation rather than the connection it is associated with. Signed-off-by:
-
