- 18 Apr, 2023 40 commits
-
-
Yosry Ahmed authored
Memory reclaim is a sleepable context. Flushing is an expensive operaiton that scales with the number of cpus and the number of cgroups in the system, so avoid doing it atomically unnecessarily. This can slow down reclaim code if flushing stats is taking too long, but there is already multiple cond_resched()'s in reclaim code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330191801.1967435-8-yosryahmed@google.comSigned-off-by:
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Acked-by:
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by:
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vasily Averin <vasily.averin@linux.dev> Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Yosry Ahmed authored
In workingset_refault(), we call mem_cgroup_flush_stats_atomic_ratelimited() to read accurate stats within an RCU read section and with sleeping disallowed. Move the call above the RCU read section to make it non-atomic. Flushing is an expensive operation that scales with the number of cpus and the number of cgroups in the system, so avoid doing it atomically where possible. Since workingset_refault() is the only caller of mem_cgroup_flush_stats_atomic_ratelimited(), just make it non-atomic, and rename it to mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330191801.1967435-7-yosryahmed@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yosry Ahmed authored
Currently, all contexts that flush memcg stats do so with sleeping not allowed. Some of these contexts are perfectly safe to sleep in, such as reading cgroup files from userspace or the background periodic flusher. Flushing is an expensive operation that scales with the number of cpus and the number of cgroups in the system, so avoid doing it atomically where possible. Refactor the code to make mem_cgroup_flush_stats() non-atomic (aka sleepable), and provide a separate atomic version. The atomic version is used in reclaim, refault, writeback, and in mem_cgroup_usage(). All other code paths are left to use the non-atomic version. This includes callbacks for userspace reads and the periodic flusher. Since refault is the only caller of mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited(), change it to mem_cgroup_flush_stats_atomic_ratelimited(). Reclaim and refault code paths are modified to do non-atomic flushing in separate later patches -- so it will eventually be changed back to mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330191801.1967435-6-yosryahmed@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yosry Ahmed authored
As Johannes notes in [1], stats_flush_lock is currently used to: (a) Protect updated to stats_flush_threshold. (b) Protect updates to flush_next_time. (c) Serializes calls to cgroup_rstat_flush() based on those ratelimits. However: 1. stats_flush_threshold is already an atomic 2. flush_next_time is not atomic. The writer is locked, but the reader is lockless. If the reader races with a flush, you could see this: if (time_after(jiffies, flush_next_time)) spin_trylock() flush_next_time = now + delay flush() spin_unlock() spin_trylock() flush_next_time = now + delay flush() spin_unlock() which means we already can get flushes at a higher frequency than FLUSH_TIME during races. But it isn't really a problem. The reader could also see garbled partial updates if the compiler decides to split the write, so it needs at least READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE protection. 3. Serializing cgroup_rstat_flush() calls against the ratelimit factors is currently broken because of the race in 2. But the race is actually harmless, all we might get is the occasional earlier flush. If there is no delta, the flush won't do much. And if there is, the flush is justified. So the lock can be removed all together. However, the lock also served the purpose of preventing a thundering herd problem for concurrent flushers, see [2]. Use an atomic instead to serve the purpose of unifying concurrent flushers. [1]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230323172732.GE739026@cmpxchg.org/ [2]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210716212137.1391164-2-shakeelb@google.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330191801.1967435-5-yosryahmed@google.comSigned-off-by: -
Yosry Ahmed authored
Currently, the only context in which we can invoke an rstat flush from irq context is through mem_cgroup_usage() on the root memcg when called from memcg_check_events(). An rstat flush is an expensive operation that should not be done in irq context, so do not flush stats and use the stale stats in this case. Arguably, usage threshold events are not reliable on the root memcg anyway since its usage is ill-defined. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330191801.1967435-4-yosryahmed@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yosry Ahmed authored
mem_cgroup_flush_stats_delayed() suggests his is using a delayed_work, but this is actually sometimes flushing directly from the callsite. What it's doing is ratelimited calls. A better name would be mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330191801.1967435-3-yosryahmed@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yosry Ahmed authored
Patch series "memcg: avoid flushing stats atomically where possible", v3. rstat flushing is an expensive operation that scales with the number of cpus and the number of cgroups in the system. The purpose of this series is to minimize the contexts where we flush stats atomically. Patches 1 and 2 are cleanups requested during reviews of prior versions of this series. Patch 3 makes sure we never try to flush from within an irq context. Patches 4 to 7 introduce separate variants of mem_cgroup_flush_stats() for atomic and non-atomic flushing, and make sure we only flush the stats atomically when necessary. Patch 8 is a slightly tangential optimization that limits the work done by rstat flushing in some scenarios. This patch (of 8): cgroup_rstat_flush_irqsafe() can be a confusing name. It may read as "irqs are disabled throughout", which is what the current implementation does (currently under discussion [1]), but is not the intention. The intention is that this function is safe to call from atomic contexts. Name it as such. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330191801.1967435-1-yosryahmed@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330191801.1967435-2-yosryahmed@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Peng Zhang authored
In __kfence_alloc() and __kfence_free(), we will set and check canary. Assuming that the size of the object is close to 0, nearly 4k memory accesses are required because setting and checking canary is executed byte by byte. canary is now defined like this: KFENCE_CANARY_PATTERN(addr) ((u8)0xaa ^ (u8)((unsigned long)(addr) & 0x7)) Observe that canary is only related to the lower three bits of the address, so every 8 bytes of canary are the same. We can access 8-byte canary each time instead of byte-by-byte, thereby optimizing nearly 4k memory accesses to 4k/8 times. Use the bcc tool funclatency to measure the latency of __kfence_alloc() and __kfence_free(), the numbers (deleted the distribution of latency) is posted below. Though different object sizes will have an impact on the measurement, we ignore it for now and assume the average object size is roughly equal. Before patching: __kfence_alloc: avg = 5055 nsecs, total: 5515252 nsecs, count: 1091 __kfence_free: avg = 5319 nsecs, total: 9735130 nsecs, count: 1830 After patching: __kfence_alloc: avg = 3597 nsecs, total: 6428491 nsecs, count: 1787 __kfence_free: avg = 3046 nsecs, total: 3415390 nsecs, count: 1121 The numbers indicate that there is ~30% - ~40% performance improvement. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230403122738.6006-1-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.comSigned-off-by:
Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by:
Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Shixin authored
Since some users may not use zswap, the zswap_pool is wasted. Save memory by delaying the initialization of zswap until enabled. [liushixin2@huawei.com: fix some pattern problem suggested by Christoph] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230411093632.822290-4-liushixin2@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230403121318.1876082-4-liushixin2@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Shixin authored
The zswap_init_started variable name has a bit confusing. Actually, there are three state: uninitialized, initial failed and initial succeed. Add a new variable zswap_init_state to replace zswap_init_{started/failed}. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230403121318.1876082-3-liushixin2@huawei.comSigned-off-by: -
Liu Shixin authored
Patch series "Delay the initialization of zswap", v9. In the initialization of zswap, about 18MB memory will be allocated for zswap_pool. Since some users may not use zswap, the zswap_pool is wasted. Save memory by delaying the initialization of zswap until enabled. This patch (of 3): Remove zswap_entry_cache_create and zswap_entry_cache_destroy and use kmem_cache_* function directly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230411093632.822290-1-liushixin2@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230403121318.1876082-1-liushixin2@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230403121318.1876082-2-liushixin2@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) authored
Short the name of the addr_to_vb_xarray() function to the addr_to_vb_xa(). This aligns with other internal function abbreviations. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230331073727.6968-1-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Suggested-by:
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Hao Ge authored
kmemleak-test.c was moved to the samples directory in 1abbef4f ("mm,kmemleak-test.c: move kmemleak-test.c to samples dir"). If CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST=m and CONFIG_SAMPLES is unset, kmemleak-test.c will be unnecessarily compiled. So move the entry for CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST from mm/Kconfig and add a new CONFIG_SAMPLE_KMEMLEAK in samples/ to control whether kmemleak-test.c is built or not. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330060904.292975-1-gehao@kylinos.cn Fixes: 1abbef4f ("mm,kmemleak-test.c: move kmemleak-test.c to samples dir") Signed-off-by:
Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.dev> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Ye Xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by:
-
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) authored
Add vm_map_ram()/vm_unmap_ram() test case to our stress test-suite. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix whitespace, per Lorenzo] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330190639.431589-2-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) authored
A global vmap_blocks-xarray array can be contented under heavy usage of the vm_map_ram()/vm_unmap_ram() APIs. The lock_stat shows that a "vmap_blocks.xa_lock" lock is a second in a top-list when it comes to contentions: <snip> ---------------------------------------- class name con-bounces contentions ... ---------------------------------------- vmap_area_lock: 2554079 2554276 ... -------------- vmap_area_lock 1297948 [<00000000dd41cbaa>] alloc_vmap_area+0x1c7/0x910 vmap_area_lock 1256330 [<000000009d927bf3>] free_vmap_block+0x4a/0xe0 vmap_area_lock 1 [<00000000c95c05a7>] find_vm_area+0x16/0x70 -------------- vmap_area_lock 1738590 [<00000000dd41cbaa>] alloc_vmap_area+0x1c7/0x910 vmap_area_lock 815688 [<000000009d927bf3>] free_vmap_block+0x4a/0xe0 vmap_area_lock 1 [<00000000c1d619d7>] __get_vm_area_node+0xd2/0x170 vmap_blocks.xa_lock: 862689 862698 ... ------------------- vmap_blocks.xa_lock 378418 [<00000000625a5626>] vm_map_ram+0x359/0x4a0 vmap_blocks.xa_lock 484280 [<00000000caa2ef03>] xa_erase+0xe/0x30 ------------------- vmap_blocks.xa_lock 576226 [<00000000caa2ef03>] xa_erase+0xe/0x30 vmap_blocks.xa_lock 286472 [<00000000625a5626>] vm_map_ram+0x359/0x4a0 ... <snip> that is a result of running vm_map_ram()/vm_unmap_ram() in a loop. The test creates 64(on 64 CPUs system) threads and each one maps/unmaps 1 page. After this change the "xa_lock" can be considered as a noise in the same test condition: <snip> ... &xa->xa_lock#1: 10333 10394 ... -------------- &xa->xa_lock#1 5349 [<00000000bbbc9751>] xa_erase+0xe/0x30 &xa->xa_lock#1 5045 [<0000000018def45d>] vm_map_ram+0x3a4/0x4f0 -------------- &xa->xa_lock#1 7326 [<0000000018def45d>] vm_map_ram+0x3a4/0x4f0 &xa->xa_lock#1 3068 [<00000000bbbc9751>] xa_erase+0xe/0x30 ... <snip> Running the test_vmalloc.sh run_test_mask=1024 nr_threads=64 nr_pages=5 shows around ~8 percent of throughput improvement of vm_map_ram() and vm_unmap_ram() APIs. This patch does not fix vmap_area_lock/free_vmap_area_lock and purge_vmap_area_lock bottle-necks, it is rather a separate rework. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230330190639.431589-1-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The free_area_empty() helper is only used inside mm/ so move it there to reduce noise in include/linux/mmzone.h Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230326160215.2674531-1-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Suggested-by:
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Zhen Lei authored
After commit 446ec838 ("mm/page_alloc: use might_alloc()") and commit 84172f4b ("mm/page_alloc: combine __alloc_pages and __alloc_pages_nodemask"), the comment is no longer accurate. Flag '__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM' is clear enough on its own, so remove the comment rather than update it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230327034149.942-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) authored
Sidhartha Kumar removed the last caller of PageHeadHuge(), so we can now remove it and make folio_test_hugetlb() the real implementation. Add kernel-doc for folio_test_hugetlb(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230327151050.1787744-1-willy@infradead.orgSigned-off-by:
Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-15-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-14-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
sh defines insane ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER allowing MAX_ORDER up to 63, which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of 2^63 pages. Drop bogus definitions of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a simple integer with sensible defaults. Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges. [rppt@kernel.org: untweak ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER's `range'] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-13-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-13-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. [rppt@kernel.org: tweak ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER's `range'] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-12-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-12-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
PowerPC defines ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER some of which are insanely allowing MAX_ORDER up to 63, which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of 2^63 pages. Drop bogus definitions of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a simple integer with sensible defaults. Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-11-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-10-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
nios2 defines range for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER allowing MAX_ORDER up to 19, which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of 2^19 pages or 2GiB. Drop bogus definition of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a simple integer with sensible default. Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-9-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-8-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-7-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Reviewed-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
It is enough to keep default values for base and huge pages without letting users to override ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER. Drop the prompt to make the option unvisible in *config. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-6-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The default value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER matches the generic default defined in the MM code, the architecture does not support huge pages, so there is no need to keep ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER option available. Drop it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-5-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. [rppt@kernel.org: change ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER dependencies] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-4-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-4-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memory management. Having predefined ranges suggests that the values within those ranges are sensible, but one has to *really* understand implications of changing MAX_ORDER before actually amending it and ranges don't help here. Drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and make its prompt visible only if EXPERT=y Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-3-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport (IBM) authored
Patch series "arch,mm: cleanup Kconfig entries for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER", v3. Several architectures have ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER in their Kconfig and they all have wrong and misleading prompt and help text for this option. Besides, some define insane limits for possible values of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER, some carefully define ranges only for a subset of possible configurations, some make this option configurable by users for no good reason. This set updates the prompt and help text everywhere and does its best to update actual definitions of ranges where applicable. kbuild generated a bunch of false positives because it assigns -1 to ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER, hopefully this will be fixed soon. This patch (of 14): The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to describe this configuration option. Update both to actually describe what this option does. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-1-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-1-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-2-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
Leonardo Bras has noticed that pcp charge cache draining might be disruptive on workloads relying on 'isolated cpus', a feature commonly used on workloads that are sensitive to interruption and context switching such as vRAN and Industrial Control Systems. There are essentially two ways how to approach the issue. We can either allow the pcp cache to be drained on a different rather than a local cpu or avoid remote flushing on isolated cpus. The current pcp charge cache is really optimized for high performance and it always relies to stick with its cpu. That means it only requires local_lock (preempt_disable on !RT) and draining is handed over to pcp WQ to drain locally again. The former solution (remote draining) would require to add an additional locking to prevent local charges from racing with the draining. This adds an atomic operation to otherwise simple arithmetic fast path in the try_charge path. Another concern is that the remote draining can cause a lock contention for the isolated workloads and therefore interfere with it indirectly via user space interfaces. Another option is to avoid draining scheduling on isolated cpus altogether. That means that those remote cpus would keep their charges even after drain_all_stock returns. This is certainly not optimal either but it shouldn't really cause any major problems. In the worst case (many isolated cpus with charges - each of them with MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH i.e 64 page) the memory consumption of a memcg would be artificially higher than can be immediately used from other cpus. Theoretically a memcg OOM killer could be triggered pre-maturely. Currently it is not really clear whether this is a practical problem though. Tight memcg limit would be really counter productive to cpu isolated workloads pretty much by definition because any memory reclaimed induced by memcg limit could break user space timing expectations as those usually expect execution in the userspace most of the time. Also charges could be left behind on memcg removal. Any future charge on those isolated cpus will drain that pcp cache so this won't be a permanent leak. Considering cons and pros of both approaches this patch is implementing the second option and simply do not schedule remote draining if the target cpu is isolated. This solution is much more simpler. It doesn't add any new locking and it is more more predictable from the user space POV. Should the pre-mature memcg OOM become a real life problem, we can revisit this decision. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: memcontrol.c needs sched/isolation.h] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303180617.7E3aIlHf-lkp@intel.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230317134448.11082-3-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Acked-by:
Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> Acked-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
Patch series "memcg, cpuisol: do not interfere pcp cache charges draining with cpuisol workloads". Leonardo has reported [1] that pcp memcg charge draining can interfere with cpu isolated workloads. The said draining is done from a WQ context with a pcp worker scheduled on each CPU which holds any cached charges for a specific memcg hierarchy. Operation is not really a common operation [2]. It can be triggered from the userspace though so some care is definitely due. Leonardo has tried to address the issue by allowing remote charge draining [3]. This approach requires an additional locking to synchronize pcp caches sync from a remote cpu from local pcp consumers. Even though the proposed lock was per-cpu there is still potential for contention and less predictable behavior. This patchset addresses the issue from a different angle. Rather than dealing with a potential synchronization, cpus which are isolated are simply never scheduled to be drained. This means that a small amount of charges could be laying around and waiting for a later use or they are flushed when a different memcg is charged from the same cpu. More details are in patch 2. The first patch from Frederic is implementing an abstraction to tell whether a specific cpu has been isolated and therefore require a special treatment. This patch (of 2): Provide this new API to check if a CPU has been isolated either through isolcpus= or nohz_full= kernel parameter. It aims at avoiding kernel load deemed to be safely spared on CPUs running sensitive workload that can't bear any disturbance, such as pcp cache draining. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230317134448.11082-1-mhocko@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230317134448.11082-2-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Ivan Orlov authored
Syzkaller reported the following issue: kernel BUG at mm/khugepaged.c:1823! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 1 PID: 5097 Comm: syz-executor220 Not tainted 6.2.0-syzkaller-13154-g857f1268 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/16/2023 RIP: 0010:collapse_file mm/khugepaged.c:1823 [inline] RIP: 0010:hpage_collapse_scan_file+0x67c8/0x7580 mm/khugepaged.c:2233 Code: 00 00 89 de e8 c9 66 a3 ff 31 ff 89 de e8 c0 66 a3 ff 45 84 f6 0f 85 28 0d 00 00 e8 22 64 a3 ff e9 dc f7 ff ff e8 18 64 a3 ff <0f> 0b f3 0f 1e fa e8 0d 64 a3 ff e9 93 f6 ff ff f3 0f 1e fa 4c 89 RSP: 0018:ffffc90003dff4e0 EFLAGS: 00010093 RAX: ffffffff81e95988 RBX: 00000000000001c1 RCX: ffff8880205b3a80 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000001c0 RDI: 00000000000001c1 RBP: ffffc90003dff830 R08: ffffffff81e90e67 R09: fffffbfff1a433c3 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: dffffc0000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffc90003dff6c0 R14: 00000000000001c0 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fdbae5ee700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fdbae6901e0 CR3: 000000007b2dd000 CR4: 00000000003506e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> madvise_collapse+0x721/0xf50 mm/khugepaged.c:2693 madvise_vma_behavior mm/madvise.c:1086 [inline] madvise_walk_vmas mm/madvise.c:1260 [inline] do_madvise+0x9e5/0x4680 mm/madvise.c:1439 __do_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1452 [inline] __se_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1450 [inline] __x64_sys_madvise+0xa5/0xb0 mm/madvise.c:1450 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd The xas_store() call during page cache scanning can potentially translate 'xas' into the error state (with the reproducer provided by the syzkaller the error code is -ENOMEM). However, there are no further checks after the 'xas_store', and the next call of 'xas_next' at the start of the scanning cycle doesn't increase the xa_index, and the issue occurs. This patch will add the xarray state error checking after the xas_store() and the corresponding result error code. Tested via syzbot. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: update include/trace/events/huge_memory.h's SCAN_STATUS] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230329145330.23191-1-ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=7d6bb3760e026ece7524500fe44fb024a0e959fcSigned-off-by:
Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+9578faa5475acb35fa50@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by:
Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Himadri Pandya <himadrispandya@gmail.com> Cc: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Arnd Bergmann authored
Some unknown -mllvm options (i.e. those starting with the letter "h") don't cause an error to be returned by clang, so the cc-option helper adds the unknown hwasan-kernel-mem-intrinsic-prefix=1 flag to CFLAGS with compilers that are new enough for hwasan but too old for this option. This causes a rather unreadable build failure: fixdep: error opening file: scripts/mod/.empty.o.d: No such file or directory make[4]: *** [/home/arnd/arm-soc/scripts/Makefile.build:252: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 2 fixdep: error opening file: scripts/mod/.devicetable-offsets.s.d: No such file or directory make[4]: *** [/home/arnd/arm-soc/scripts/Makefile.build:114: scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s] Error 2 Add a version check to only allow this option with clang-15, gcc-13 or later versions. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230418122350.1646391-1-arnd@kernel.org Fixes: 51287dcb ("kasan: emit different calls for instrumentable memintrinsics") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANpmjNMwYosrvqh4ogDO8rgn+SeDHM2b-shD21wTypm_6MMe=g@mail.gmail.com/Signed-off-by:
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by:
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <Vincenzo.Frascino@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sergey Senozhatsky authored
The current implementation of the compaction loop fails to set the source zspage pointer to NULL in all cases, leading to a potential issue where __zs_compact() could use a stale zspage pointer. This pointer could even point to a previously freed zspage, causing unexpected behavior in the putback_zspage() and migrate_write_unlock() functions after returning from the compaction loop. Address the issue by ensuring that the source zspage pointer is always set to NULL when it should be. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417130850.1784777-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org Fixes: 5a845e9f ("zsmalloc: rework compaction algorithm") Signed-off-by:
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Reported-by:
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Tested-by:
-
Arnd Bergmann authored
clang produces a build failure on x86 for some randconfig builds after a change that moves around code to mm/mm_init.c: Cannot find symbol for section 2: .text. mm/mm_init.o: failed I have not been able to figure out why this happens, but the __weak annotation on arch_has_descending_max_zone_pfns() is the trigger here. Removing the weak function in favor of an open-coded Kconfig option check avoids the problem and becomes clearer as well as better to optimize by the compiler. [arnd@arndb.de: fix logic bug] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230415081904.969049-1-arnd@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414080418.110236-1-arnd@kernel.org Fixes: 9420f89d ("mm: move most of core MM initialization to mm/mm_init.c") Signed-off-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Tested-by:
SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Tested-by:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Acked-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
23baf831 ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely") results in various boot failures (hang) on arm targets Debug messages reveal the reason. ########### MAX_ORDER=10 start=0 __ffs(start)=-1 min()=10 min_t=-1 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If start==0, __ffs(start) returns 0xfffffff or (as int) -1, which min_t() interprets as such, while min() apparently uses the returned unsigned long value. Obviously a negative order isn't received well by the rest of the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment, per Mike] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZDBa7HWZK69dKKzH@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230406072529.vupqyrzqnhyozeyh@box.shutemov.name Fixes: 23baf831 ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely") Signed-off-by:
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Reported-by:
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9460377a-38aa-4f39-ad57-fb73725f92db@roeck-us.netReviewed-by:
-
Andrew Morton authored
-
