1. 11 Jan, 2018 2 commits
    • Jason Yan's avatar
      scsi: libsas: notify event PORTE_BROADCAST_RCVD in sas_enable_revalidation() · 1689c936
      Jason Yan authored
      There are two places queuing the disco event DISCE_REVALIDATE_DOMAIN.
      One is in sas_porte_broadcast_rcvd() and uses sas_chain_event() to queue
      the event. The other is in sas_enable_revalidation() and uses
      sas_queue_event() to queue the event. We have diffrent work queues for
      event and discovery now, so the DISCE_REVALIDATE_DOMAIN event may be
      processed in both event queue and discovery queue.
      
      Now since we do synchronous event handling, we cannot do it in discovery
      queue, so have to trigger a fake broadcast event to re-trigger the
      revalidation from event queue.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
      CC: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
      CC: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
      CC: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
      CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      CC: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
      CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
      1689c936
    • Jason Yan's avatar
      scsi: libsas: direct call probe and destruct · 0558f33c
      Jason Yan authored
      In commit 87c8331f ("[SCSI] libsas: prevent domain rediscovery
      competing with ata error handling") introduced disco mutex to prevent
      rediscovery competing with ata error handling and put the whole
      revalidation in the mutex. But the rphy add/remove needs to wait for the
      error handling which also grabs the disco mutex. This may leads to dead
      lock.So the probe and destruct event were introduce to do the rphy
      add/remove asynchronously and out of the lock.
      
      The asynchronously processed workers makes the whole discovery process
      not atomic, the other events may interrupt the process. For example,
      if a loss of signal event inserted before the probe event, the
      sas_deform_port() is called and the port will be deleted.
      
      And sas_port_delete() may run before the destruct event, but the
      port-x:x is the top parent of end device or expander. This leads to
      a kernel WARNING such as:
      
      [   82.042979] sysfs group 'power' not found for kobject 'phy-1:0:22'
      [   82.042983] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [   82.042986] WARNING: CPU: 54 PID: 1714 at fs/sysfs/group.c:237
      sysfs_remove_group+0x94/0xa0
      [   82.043059] Call trace:
      [   82.043082] [<ffff0000082e7624>] sysfs_remove_group+0x94/0xa0
      [   82.043085] [<ffff00000864e320>] dpm_sysfs_remove+0x60/0x70
      [   82.043086] [<ffff00000863ee10>] device_del+0x138/0x308
      [   82.043089] [<ffff00000869a2d0>] sas_phy_delete+0x38/0x60
      [   82.043091] [<ffff00000869a86c>] do_sas_phy_delete+0x6c/0x80
      [   82.043093] [<ffff00000863dc20>] device_for_each_child+0x58/0xa0
      [   82.043095] [<ffff000008696f80>] sas_remove_children+0x40/0x50
      [   82.043100] [<ffff00000869d1bc>] sas_destruct_devices+0x64/0xa0
      [   82.043102] [<ffff0000080e93bc>] process_one_work+0x1fc/0x4b0
      [   82.043104] [<ffff0000080e96c0>] worker_thread+0x50/0x490
      [   82.043105] [<ffff0000080f0364>] kthread+0xfc/0x128
      [   82.043107] [<ffff0000080836c0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50
      
      Make probe and destruct a direct call in the disco and revalidate function,
      but put them outside the lock. The whole discovery or revalidate won't
      be interrupted by other events. And the DISCE_PROBE and DISCE_DESTRUCT
      event are deleted as a result of the direct call.
      
      Introduce a new list to destruct the sas_port and put the port delete after
      the destruct. This makes sure the right order of destroying the sysfs
      kobject and fix the warning above.
      
      In sas_ex_revalidate_domain() have a loop to find all broadcasted
      device, and sometimes we have a chance to find the same expander twice.
      Because the sas_port will be deleted at the end of the whole revalidate
      process, sas_port with the same name cannot be added before this.
      Otherwise the sysfs will complain of creating duplicate filename. Since
      the LLDD will send broadcast for every device change, we can only
      process one expander's revalidation.
      
      [mkp: kbuild test robot warning]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
      CC: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
      CC: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
      CC: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
      CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      CC: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
      CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
      0558f33c
  2. 09 Jan, 2018 11 commits
  3. 08 Jan, 2018 1 commit
  4. 04 Jan, 2018 26 commits