- 14 Mar, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Edmund Nadolski authored
This patch addresses an issue that causes fiemap to falsely report a shared extent. The test case is as follows: xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -b 16k 0 64k" -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5 sync xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5 which gives the resulting output: wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0 64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (121.359 MiB/sec and 7766.9903 ops/sec) /media/scratch/file5: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x2001 /media/scratch/file5: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1 This is because btrfs_check_shared calls find_parent_nodes repeatedly in a loop, passing a share_check struct to report the count of shared extent. But btrfs_check_shared does not re-initialize the count value to zero for subsequent calls from the loop, resulting in a false share count value. This is a regressive behavior from 4.13. With proper re-initialization the test result is as follows: wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0 64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (110.035 MiB/sec and 7042.2535 ops/sec) /media/scratch/file5: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1 /media/scratch/file5: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1 which corrects the regression. Fixes: 3ec4d323 ("btrfs: allow backref search checks for shared extents") Signed-off-by:
Edmund Nadolski <enadolski@suse.com> [ add text from cover letter to changelog ] Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Dmitriy Gorokh authored
On detaching of a disk which is a part of a RAID6 filesystem, the following kernel OOPS may happen: [63122.680461] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 [63122.719584] BTRFS warning (device sdo): lost page write due to IO error on /dev/sdo [63122.719587] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 1, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 [63122.803516] BTRFS warning (device sdo): lost page write due to IO error on /dev/sdo [63122.803519] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 2, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 [63122.863902] BTRFS critical (device sdo): fatal error on device /dev/sdo [63122.935338] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000080 [63122.946554] IP: fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] [63122.958185] PGD 9ecda067 P4D 9ecda067 PUD b2b37067 PMD 0 [63122.971202] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [63123.006760] CPU: 0 PID: 3979 Comm: kworker/u8:9 Tainted: G W 4.14.2-16-scst34x+ #8 [63123.007091] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [63123.007402] Workqueue: btrfs-worker btrfs_worker_helper [btrfs] [63123.007595] task: ffff880036ea4040 task.stack: ffffc90006384000 [63123.007796] RIP: 0010:fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] [63123.007968] RSP: 0018:ffffc90006387ad8 EFLAGS: 00010287 [63123.008140] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88004beaa0b8 RCX: ffff8800b2bd5690 [63123.008359] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88007bb43500 RDI: ffff88004beaa000 [63123.008621] RBP: ffffc90006387ae8 R08: 0000000099100000 R09: ffff8800b2bd5600 [63123.008840] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000010000 R12: ffff88007bb43500 [63123.009059] R13: 00000000fffffffb R14: ffff880036fc5180 R15: 0000000000000004 [63123.009278] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8800b7000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [63123.009564] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [63123.009748] CR2: 0000000000000080 CR3: 00000000b0866000 CR4: 00000000000406f0 [63123.009969] Call Trace: [63123.010085] raid_write_end_io+0x7e/0x80 [btrfs] [63123.010251] bio_endio+0xa1/0x120 [63123.010378] generic_make_request+0x218/0x270 [63123.010921] submit_bio+0x66/0x130 [63123.011073] finish_rmw+0x3fc/0x5b0 [btrfs] [63123.011245] full_stripe_write+0x96/0xc0 [btrfs] [63123.011428] raid56_parity_write+0x117/0x170 [btrfs] [63123.011604] btrfs_map_bio+0x2ec/0x320 [btrfs] [63123.011759] ? ___cache_free+0x1c5/0x300 [63123.011909] __btrfs_submit_bio_done+0x26/0x50 [btrfs] [63123.012087] run_one_async_done+0x9c/0xc0 [btrfs] [63123.012257] normal_work_helper+0x19e/0x300 [btrfs] [63123.012429] btrfs_worker_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [63123.012656] process_one_work+0x14d/0x350 [63123.012888] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3a0 [63123.013026] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x15/0x20 [63123.013192] kthread+0x109/0x140 [63123.013315] ? process_scheduled_works+0x40/0x40 [63123.013472] ? kthread_stop+0x110/0x110 [63123.013610] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30 [63123.014469] RIP: fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] RSP: ffffc90006387ad8 [63123.014678] CR2: 0000000000000080 [63123.016590] ---[ end trace a295ea7259c17880 ]— This is reproducible in a cycle, where a series of writes is followed by SCSI device delete command. The test may take up to few minutes. Fixes: 74d46992 ("block: replace bi_bdev with a gendisk pointer and partitions index") [ no signed-off-by provided ] Author: Dmitriy Gorokh <Dmitriy.Gorokh@wdc.com> Reviewed-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- 01 Mar, 2018 8 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we have a file with 2 (or more) hard links in the same directory, remove one of the hard links, create a new file (or link an existing file) in the same directory with the name of the removed hard link, and then finally fsync the new file, we end up with a log that fails to replay, causing a mount failure. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/testdir $ touch /mnt/testdir/foo $ ln /mnt/testdir/foo /mnt/testdir/bar $ sync $ unlink /mnt/testdir/bar $ touch /mnt/testdir/bar $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir/bar <power failure> $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt mount: mount(2) failed: /mnt: No such file or directory When replaying the log, for that example, we also see the following in dmesg/syslog: [71813.671307] BTRFS info (device dm-0): failed to delete reference to bar, inode 258 parent 257 [71813.674204] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [71813.675694] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) [71813.677236] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13231 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:4128 __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17b/0x355 [btrfs] [71813.679669] Modules linked in: btrfs xfs f2fs dm_flakey dm_mod dax ghash_clmulni_intel ppdev pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper evdev psmouse i2c_piix4 parport_pc i2c_core pcspkr sg serio_raw parport button sunrpc loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 zstd_decompress zstd_compress xxhash raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod ata_generic sd_mod virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel floppy virtio e1000 scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs] [71813.679669] CPU: 1 PID: 13231 Comm: mount Tainted: G W 4.15.0-rc9-btrfs-next-56+ #1 [71813.679669] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.10.2-0-g5f4c7b1-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [71813.679669] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17b/0x355 [btrfs] [71813.679669] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001cef738 EFLAGS: 00010286 [71813.679669] RAX: 0000000000000025 RBX: ffff880217ce4708 RCX: 0000000000000001 [71813.679669] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff81c14bae RDI: 00000000ffffffff [71813.679669] RBP: ffffc90001cef7c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 [71813.679669] R10: ffffc90001cef5e0 R11: ffffffff8343f007 R12: ffff880217d474c8 [71813.679669] R13: 00000000fffffffe R14: ffff88021ccf1548 R15: 0000000000000101 [71813.679669] FS: 00007f7cee84c480(0000) GS:ffff88023fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [71813.679669] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [71813.679669] CR2: 00007f7cedc1abf9 CR3: 00000002354b4003 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [71813.679669] Call Trace: [71813.679669] btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17/0x41 [btrfs] [71813.679669] drop_one_dir_item+0xfa/0x131 [btrfs] [71813.679669] add_inode_ref+0x71e/0x851 [btrfs] [71813.679669] ? __lock_is_held+0x39/0x71 [71813.679669] ? replay_one_buffer+0x53/0x53a [btrfs] [71813.679669] replay_one_buffer+0x4a4/0x53a [btrfs] [71813.679669] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3a/0x57 [71813.679669] ? __lock_is_held+0x39/0x71 [71813.679669] walk_up_log_tree+0x101/0x1d2 [btrfs] [71813.679669] walk_log_tree+0xad/0x188 [btrfs] [71813.679669] btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x1fa/0x31e [btrfs] [71813.679669] ? replay_one_extent+0x544/0x544 [btrfs] [71813.679669] open_ctree+0x1cf6/0x2209 [btrfs] [71813.679669] btrfs_mount_root+0x368/0x482 [btrfs] [71813.679669] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6 [71813.679669] ? __lockdep_init_map+0x176/0x1c2 [71813.679669] ? mount_fs+0x64/0x10b [71813.679669] mount_fs+0x64/0x10b [71813.679669] vfs_kern_mount+0x68/0xce [71813.679669] btrfs_mount+0x13e/0x772 [btrfs] [71813.679669] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6 [71813.679669] ? __lockdep_init_map+0x176/0x1c2 [71813.679669] ? mount_fs+0x64/0x10b [71813.679669] mount_fs+0x64/0x10b [71813.679669] vfs_kern_mount+0x68/0xce [71813.679669] do_mount+0x6e5/0x973 [71813.679669] ? memdup_user+0x3e/0x5c [71813.679669] SyS_mount+0x72/0x98 [71813.679669] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b [71813.679669] RIP: 0033:0x7f7cedf150ba [71813.679669] RSP: 002b:00007ffca71da688 EFLAGS: 00000206 [71813.679669] Code: 7f a0 e8 51 0c fd ff 48 8b 43 50 f0 0f ba a8 30 2c 00 00 02 72 17 41 83 fd fb 74 11 44 89 ee 48 c7 c7 7d 11 7f a0 e8 38 f5 8d e0 <0f> ff 44 89 e9 ba 20 10 00 00 eb 4d 48 8b 4d b0 48 8b 75 88 4c [71813.679669] ---[ end trace 83bd473fc5b4663b ]--- [71813.854764] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_unlink_inode:4128: errno=-2 No such entry [71813.886994] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_replay_log:2307: errno=-2 No such entry (Failed to recover log tree) [71813.903357] BTRFS error (device dm-0): cleaner transaction attach returned -30 [71814.128078] BTRFS error (device dm-0): open_ctree failed This happens because the log has inode reference items for both inode 258 (the first file we created) and inode 259 (the second file created), and when processing the reference item for inode 258, we replace the corresponding item in the subvolume tree (which has two names, "foo" and "bar") witht he one in the log (which only has one name, "foo") without removing the corresponding dir index keys from the parent directory. Later, when processing the inode reference item for inode 259, which has a name of "bar" associated to it, we notice that dir index entries exist for that name and for a different inode, so we attempt to unlink that name, which fails because the inode reference item for inode 258 no longer has the name "bar" associated to it, making a call to btrfs_unlink_inode() fail with a -ENOENT error. Fix this by unlinking all the names in an inode reference item from a subvolume tree that are not present in the inode reference item found in the log tree, before overwriting it with the item from the log tree. Signed-off-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If in the same transaction we rename a special file (fifo, character/block device or symbolic link), create a hard link for it having its old name then sync the log, we will end up with a log that can not be replayed and at when attempting to replay it, an EEXIST error is returned and mounting the filesystem fails. Example scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/testdir $ mkfifo /mnt/testdir/foo # Make sure everything done so far is durably persisted. $ sync # Create some unrelated file and fsync it, this is just to create a log # tree. The file must be in the same directory as our special file. $ touch /mnt/testdir/f1 $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir/f1 # Rename our special file and then create a hard link with its old name. $ mv /mnt/testdir/foo /mnt/testdir/bar $ ln /mnt/testdir/bar /mnt/testdir/foo # Create some other unrelated file and fsync it, this is just to persist # the log tree which was modified by the previous rename and link # operations. Alternatively we could have modified file f1 and fsync it. $ touch /mnt/f2 $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/f2 <power failure> $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt mount: mount /dev/sdc on /mnt failed: File exists This happens because when both the log tree and the subvolume's tree have an entry in the directory "testdir" with the same name, that is, there is one key (258 INODE_REF 257) in the subvolume tree and another one in the log tree (where 258 is the inode number of our special file and 257 is the inode for directory "testdir"). Only the data of those two keys differs, in the subvolume tree the index field for inode reference has a value of 3 while the log tree it has a value of 5. Because the same key exists in both trees, but have different index, the log replay fails with an -EEXIST error when attempting to replay the inode reference from the log tree. Fix this by setting the last_unlink_trans field of the inode (our special file) to the current transaction id when a hard link is created, as this forces logging the parent directory inode, solving the conflict at log replay time. A new generic test case for fstests was also submitted. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When doing an incremental send of a filesystem with the no-holes feature enabled, we end up issuing a write operation when using the no data mode send flag, instead of issuing an update extent operation. Fix this by issuing the update extent operation instead. Trivial reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdc $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 32K" /mnt/sdc/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap1 $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 8K 8K" /mnt/sdc/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/sdc/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt/sdd $ btrfs send --no-data -p /mnt/sdc/snap1 /mnt/sdc/snap2 \ | btrfs receive -vv /mnt/sdd Before this change the output of the second receive command is: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-fc6755918447... utimes write foobar, offset 8192, len 8192 utimes foobar BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-... After this change it is: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64... utimes update_extent foobar: offset=8192, len=8192 utimes foobar BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64... Signed-off-by: -
Anand Jain authored
The fs_info::super_copy is a byte copy of the on-disk structure and all members must use the accessor macros/functions to obtain the right value. This was missing in update_super_roots and in sysfs readers. Moving between opposite endianness hosts will report bogus numbers in sysfs, and mount may fail as the root will not be restored correctly. If the filesystem is always used on a same endian host, this will not be a problem. Fix this by using the btrfs_set_super...() functions to set fs_info::super_copy values, and for the sysfs, use the cached fs_info::nodesize/sectorsize values. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: df93589a ("btrfs: export more from FS_INFO to sysfs") Signed-off-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Hans van Kranenburg authored
In case of using DUP, we search for enough unallocated disk space on a device to hold two stripes. The devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail that holds the amount of unallocated space found is directly assigned to stripe_size, while it's actually twice the stripe size. Later on in the code, an unconditional division of stripe_size by dev_stripes corrects the value, but in the meantime there's a check to see if the stripe_size does not exceed max_chunk_size. Since during this check stripe_size is twice the amount as intended, the check will reduce the stripe_size to max_chunk_size if the actual correct to be used stripe_size is more than half the amount of max_chunk_size. The unconditional division later tries to correct stripe_size, but will actually make sure we can't allocate more than half the max_chunk_size. Fix this by moving the division by dev_stripes before the max chunk size check, so it always contains the right value, instead of putting a duct tape division in further on to get it fixed again. Since in all other cases than DUP, dev_stripes is 1, this change only affects DUP. Other attempts in the past were made to fix this: * 37db63a4 "Btrfs: fix max chunk size check in chunk allocator" tried to fix the same problem, but still resulted in part of the code acting on a wrongly doubled stripe_size value. * 86db2578 "Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6" unintentionally broke this fix again. The real problem was already introduced with the rest of the code in 73c5de00. The user visible result however will be that the max chunk size for DUP will suddenly double, while it's actually acting according to the limits in the code again like it was 5 years ago. Reported-by:
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg69752.html Fixes: 73c5de00 ("btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation") Fixes: 86db2578 ("Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6") Signed-off-by:
Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Essentially duplicate the error handling from the above block which handles the !PageUptodate(page) case and additionally clear EXTENT_BOUNDARY. Signed-off-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
add_pending_csums was added as part of the new data=ordered implementation in e6dcd2dc ("Btrfs: New data=ordered implementation"). Even back then it called the btrfs_csum_file_blocks which can fail but it never bothered handling the failure. In ENOMEM situation this could lead to the filesystem failing to write the checksums for a particular extent and not detect this. On read this could lead to the filesystem erroring out due to crc mismatch. Fix it by propagating failure from add_pending_csums and handling them. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
The srcu_struct in btrfs_fs_info scales in size with NR_CPUS. On kernels built with NR_CPUS=8192, this can result in kmalloc failures that prevent mounting. There is work in progress to try to resolve this for every user of srcu_struct but using kvzalloc will work around the failures until that is complete. As an example with NR_CPUS=512 on x86_64: the overall size of subvol_srcu is 3460 bytes, fs_info is 6496. Signed-off-by:
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- 05 Feb, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Commit 4fde46f0 ("Btrfs: free the stale device") introduced btrfs_free_stale_device which iterates the device lists for all registered btrfs filesystems and deletes those devices which aren't mounted. In a btrfs_devices structure has only 1 device attached to it and it is unused then btrfs_free_stale_devices will proceed to also free the btrfs_fs_devices struct itself. Currently this leads to a use after free since list_for_each_entry will try to perform a check on the already freed memory to see if it has to terminate the loop. The fix is to use 'break' when we know we are freeing the current fs_devs. Fixes: 4fde46f0 ("Btrfs: free the stale device") Signed-off-by:
-
- 02 Feb, 2018 9 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When we are replacing a missing device we mount the filesystem with the degraded mode option in which case we are allowed to have a btrfs device structure without a backing device member (its bdev member is NULL) and therefore we can't dereference that member. Commit 38b5f68e ("btrfs: drop btrfs_device::can_discard to query directly") started to dereference that member when discarding extents, resulting in a null pointer dereference: [ 3145.322257] BTRFS warning (device sdf): devid 2 uuid 4d922414-58eb-4880-8fed-9c3840f6c5d5 is missing [ 3145.364116] BTRFS info (device sdf): dev_replace from <missing disk> (devid 2) to /dev/sdg started [ 3145.413489] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000e0 [ 3145.415085] IP: btrfs_discard_extent+0x6a/0xf8 [btrfs] [ 3145.415085] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 3145.415085] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI [ 3145.415085] Modules linked in: ppdev ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper evdev psmouse parport_pc serio_raw i2c_piix4 i2 [ 3145.415085] CPU: 0 PID: 11989 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.15.0-rc9-btrfs-next-55+ #1 [ 3145.415085] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.10.2-0-g5f4c7b1-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 3145.415085] RIP: 0010:btrfs_discard_extent+0x6a/0xf8 [btrfs] [ 3145.415085] RSP: 0018:ffffc90004813c60 EFLAGS: 00010293 [ 3145.415085] RAX: ffff88020d39cc00 RBX: ffff88020c4ea2a0 RCX: 0000000000000002 [ 3145.415085] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88020c4ea240 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 3145.415085] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000004000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 3145.415085] R10: ffffc90004813ae8 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 3145.415085] R13: ffff88020c418000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 3145.415085] FS: 00007f565681f8c0(0000) GS:ffff88023fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 3145.415085] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3145.415085] CR2: 00000000000000e0 CR3: 000000020d208006 CR4: 00000000001606f0 [ 3145.415085] Call Trace: [ 3145.415085] btrfs_finish_extent_commit+0x9a/0x1be [btrfs] [ 3145.415085] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x649/0x7a0 [btrfs] [ 3145.415085] ? start_transaction+0x2b0/0x3b3 [btrfs] [ 3145.415085] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x274/0x30c [btrfs] [ 3145.415085] btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl+0x45/0x59 [btrfs] [ 3145.415085] btrfs_ioctl+0x1a91/0x1d62 [btrfs] [ 3145.415085] ? lock_acquire+0x16a/0x1af [ 3145.415085] ? vfs_ioctl+0x1b/0x28 [ 3145.415085] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6 [ 3145.415085] vfs_ioctl+0x1b/0x28 [ 3145.415085] do_vfs_ioctl+0x5a9/0x5e0 [ 3145.415085] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x34/0x46 [ 3145.415085] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x5/0x8b [ 3145.415085] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6 [ 3145.415085] SyS_ioctl+0x52/0x76 [ 3145.415085] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b [ 3145.415085] RIP: 0033:0x7f56558b3c47 [ 3145.415085] RSP: 002b:00007ffdcfac4c58 EFLAGS: 00000202 [ 3145.415085] Code: be 02 00 00 00 4c 89 ef e8 b9 e7 03 00 85 c0 89 c5 75 75 48 8b 44 24 08 45 31 f6 48 8d 58 60 eb 52 48 8b 03 48 8b b8 a0 00 00 00 <48> 8b 87 e0 00 [ 3145.415085] RIP: btrfs_discard_extent+0x6a/0xf8 [btrfs] RSP: ffffc90004813c60 [ 3145.415085] CR2: 00000000000000e0 [ 3145.458185] ---[ end trace 06302e7ac31902bf ]--- This is trivially reproduced by running the test btrfs/027 from fstests like this: $ MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard" ./check btrfs/027 Fix this by skipping devices without a backing device before attempting to discard. Fixes: 38b5f68e ("btrfs: drop btrfs_device::can_discard to query directly") Signed-off-by:
-
Zygo Blaxell authored
Until v4.14, this warning was very infrequent: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18172 at fs/btrfs/backref.c:1391 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0 Modules linked in: [...] CPU: 3 PID: 18172 Comm: bees Tainted: G D W L 4.11.9-zb64+ #1 Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M5A78L-M/USB3, BIOS 2101 12/02/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x85/0xc2 __warn+0xd1/0xf0 warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0 __btrfs_find_all_roots+0xad/0x120 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70 iterate_extent_inodes+0x168/0x300 iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0 ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0 ? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70 btrfs_ioctl+0x8ac/0x2820 ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x200 do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x700 ? __fget+0x112/0x200 SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6 ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x140 Starting with v4.14 (specifically 86d5f994 ("btrfs: convert prelimary reference tracking to use rbtrees")) the WARN_ON occurs three orders of magnitude more frequently--almost once per second while running workloads like bees. Replace the WARN_ON() with a comment rationale for its removal. The rationale is paraphrased from an explanation by Edmund Nadolski <enadolski@suse.de> on the linux-btrfs mailing list. Fixes: 8da6d581 ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()") Signed-off-by:
Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Reviewed-by:
Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Running generic/019 with qgroups on the scratch device enabled is almost guaranteed to trigger the BUG_ON in btrfs_free_tree_block. It's supposed to trigger only on -ENOMEM, in reality, however, it's possible to get -EIO from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post. This function just finds the roots of the extent being tracked and sets the qrecord->old_roots list. If this operation fails nothing critical happens except the quota accounting can be considered wrong. In such case just set the INCONSISTENT flag for the quota and print a warning, rather than killing off the system. Additionally, it's possible to trigger a BUG_ON in btrfs_truncate_inode_items as well. Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> [ error message adjustments ] Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
The highest objectid, which is assigned to new inode, is decided at the time of initializing fs roots. However, in cases where log replay gets processed, the btree which fs root owns might be changed, so we have to search it again for the highest objectid, otherwise creating new inode would end up with -EEXIST. cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v4.4-rc6+ Fixes: f32e48e9 ("Btrfs: Initialize btrfs_root->highest_objectid when loading tree root and subvolume roots") Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
I got these from running generic/475, WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 26384 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:3326 btrfs_orphan_commit_root+0x1ac/0x2b0 [btrfs] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 IP: btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1c/0x70 [btrfs] Call Trace: btrfs_orphan_release_metadata+0x9f/0x200 [btrfs] btrfs_orphan_del+0x10d/0x170 [btrfs] btrfs_setattr+0x500/0x640 [btrfs] notify_change+0x7ae/0x870 do_truncate+0xca/0x130 vfs_truncate+0x2ee/0x3d0 do_sys_truncate+0xaf/0xf0 SyS_truncate+0xe/0x10 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0x96 The race is between btrfs_orphan_commit_root and btrfs_orphan_del, t1 t2 btrfs_orphan_commit_root btrfs_orphan_del spin_lock check (&root->orphan_inodes) root->orphan_block_rsv = NULL; spin_unlock atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes); access root->orphan_block_rsv Accessing root->orphan_block_rsv must be done before decreasing root->orphan_inodes. cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.12+ Fixes: 703c88e0 ("Btrfs: fix tracking of orphan inode count") Signed-off-by: -
Liu Bo authored
This regression is introduced in commit 3d48d981 ("btrfs: Handle uninitialised inode eviction"). There are two problems, a) it is ->destroy_inode() that does the final free on inode, not ->evict_inode(), b) clear_inode() must be called before ->evict_inode() returns. This could end up hitting BUG_ON(inode->i_state != (I_FREEING | I_CLEAR)); in evict() because I_CLEAR is set in clear_inode(). Fixes: commit 3d48d981 ("btrfs: Handle uninitialised inode eviction") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.7-rc6+ Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
It's possible that btrfs_sync_log() bails out after one of the two btrfs_write_marked_extents() which convert extent state's state bit into EXTENT_NEED_WAIT from EXTENT_DIRTY/EXTENT_NEW, however only EXTENT_DIRTY and EXTENT_NEW are searched by free_log_tree() so that those extent states with EXTENT_NEED_WAIT lead to memory leak. cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
In cases that the whole fs flips into readonly status due to failures in critical sections, then log tree's blocks are still dirty, and this leads to a crash during umount time, the crash is about use-after-free, umount -> close_ctree -> stop workers -> iput(btree_inode) -> iput_final -> write_inode_now -> ... -> queue job on stop'd workers cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> v3.12+ Fixes: 681ae509 ("Btrfs: cleanup reserved space when freeing tree log on error") Signed-off-by: -
Liu Bo authored
@cur_offset is not set back to what it should be (@cow_start) if btrfs_next_leaf() returns something wrong, and the range [cow_start, cur_offset) remains locked forever. cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
- 29 Jan, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Anand Jain authored
As struct btrfs_disk_super is being passed, so it can get devid the same way its parent does. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Instead of pointer to btrfs_fs_devices as an arg in device_list_add() better to get pointer to btrfs_device as return value, then we have both, pointer to btrfs_device and btrfs_fs_devices. btrfs_device is needed to handle reappearing missing device. Signed-off-by:
-
- 22 Jan, 2018 18 commits
-
-
Anand Jain authored
There is no other parent for device_list_add() except for btrfs_scan_one_device(), which would set btrfs_fs_devices::total_devices if device_list_add is successful and this can be done with in device_list_add() itself. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Commit 60999ca4 ("btrfs: make device scan less noisy") adds return value 1 to device_list_add(), so that parent function can call pr_info only when new device is added. Move the pr_info() part into device_list_add() so that this function can be kept simple. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
The btrfs_free_stale_devices() is updated to match for the given device path and delete it. (It searches for only unmounted list of devices.) Also drop the comment about different path being used for the same device, since now we will have cli to clean any device that's not a concern any more. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
No functional changes. Rename btrfs_free_stale_devices() arg to skip_dev, so that it reflects what that arg for. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
This updates btrfs_free_stale_devices() helper function to delete all unmouted devices, when arg is NULL. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Let the list iterator iterate further and find other stale devices and delete it. This is in preparation to add support for user land request-able stale devices cleanup. Also rename btrfs_free_stale_device() to btrfs_free_stale_devices(). Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
There is no need to check for btrfs_fs_devices::seeding when we have checked for btrfs_fs_devices::opened, because we can't sprout without its seed FS being opened. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
No functional changes, just makes the code more readable Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
In order to debug subtle bugs around merge_extent_mapping(), perf probe can be used to check the arguments, but sometimes merge_extent_mapping() got inlined by compiler and couldn't be probed. This is adding noinline attribute to merge_extent_mapping(). Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
This is a subtle case, so in order to understand the problem, it'd be good to know the content of existing and em when any error occurs. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
This test case simulates the racy situation of dio write vs dio read, and see if btrfs_get_extent() would return -EEXIST. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
This test case simulates the racy situation of buffered write vs dio read, and see if btrfs_get_extent() would return -EEXIST. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
We've observed that btrfs_get_extent() and merge_extent_mapping() could return -EEXIST in several cases, and they are caused by some racy condition, e.g dio read vs dio write, which makes the problem very tricky to reproduce. This adds extent map selftests in order to simulate those racy situations. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
These helpers are extent map specific, move them to extent_map.c. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
This is a prepare work for the following extent map selftest, which runs tests against em merge logic. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
This fixes a corner case that is caused by a race of dio write vs dio read/write. Here is how the race could happen. Suppose that no extent map has been loaded into memory yet. There is a file extent [0, 32K), two jobs are running concurrently against it, t1 is doing dio write to [8K, 32K) and t2 is doing dio read from [0, 4K) or [4K, 8K). t1 goes ahead of t2 and splits em [0, 32K) to em [0K, 8K) and [8K 32K). ------------------------------------------------------ t1 t2 btrfs_get_blocks_direct() btrfs_get_blocks_direct() -> btrfs_get_extent() -> btrfs_get_extent() -> lookup_extent_mapping() -> add_extent_mapping() -> lookup_extent_mapping() # load [0, 32K) -> btrfs_new_extent_direct() -> btrfs_drop_extent_cache() # split [0, 32K) and # drop [8K, 32K) -> add_extent_mapping() # add [8K, 32K) -> add_extent_mapping() # handle -EEXIST when adding # [0, 32K) ------------------------------------------------------ About how t2(dio read/write) runs into -EEXIST: a) add_extent_mapping() gets -EEXIST for adding em [0, 32k), b) search_extent_mapping() then returns [0, 8k) as the existing em, even though start == existing->start, em is [0, 32k) so that extent_map_end(em) > extent_map_end(existing), i.e. 32k > 8k, c) then it goes thru merge_extent_mapping() which tries to add a [8k, 8k) (with a length 0) and returns -EEXIST as [8k, 32k) is already in tree, d) so btrfs_get_extent() ends up returning -EEXIST to dio read/write, which is confusing applications. Here I conclude all the possible situations, 1) start < existing->start +-----------+em+-----------+ +--prev---+ | +-------------+ | | | | | | | +---------+ + +---+existing++ ++ + | + start 2) start == existing->start +------------em------------+ | +-------------+ | | | | | + +----existing-+ + | | + start 3) start > existing->start && start < (existing->start + existing->len) +------------em------------+ | +-------------+ | | | | | + +----existing-+ + | | + start 4) start >= (existing->start + existing->len) +-----------+em+-----------+ | +-------------+ | +--next---+ | | | | | | + +---+existing++ + +---------+ + | + start As we can see, it turns out that if start is within existing em (front inclusive), then the existing em should be returned as is, otherwise, we try our best to merge candidate em with sibling ems to form a larger em (in order to reduce the total number of em). Reported-by:David Vallender <david.vallender@landmark.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
%block_len could be checked on deciding if two em are mergeable. merge_extent_mapping() has only added the front pad if the front part of em gets truncated, but it's possible that the end part gets truncated. For both compressed extent and inline extent, em->block_len is not adjusted accordingly, and for regular extent, em->block_len always equals to em->len, hence this sets em->block_len with em->len. Signed-off-by:
-
Matthew Wilcox authored
The reada_lock in struct btrfs_device was only initialised, and not actually used. That's good because there's another lock also called reada_lock in the btrfs_fs_info that was quite heavily used. Remove this one. Signed-off-by:
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by:
-
