Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 19 Dec, 2017 8 commits
  3. 18 Dec, 2017 25 commits
  5. 17 Dec, 2017 7 commits
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      trace: reenable preemption if we modify the ip · 46df3d20
      Josef Bacik authored 
      Things got moved around between the original bpf_override_return patches
and the final version, and now the ftrace kprobe dispatcher assumes if
you modified the ip that you also enabled preemption.  Make a comment of
this and enable preemption, this fixes the lockdep splat that happened
when using this feature.

Fixes: 9802d865 ("bpf: add a bpf_override_function helper")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      46df3d20
    • Jakub Kicinski's avatar
      nfp: set flags in the correct member of netdev_bpf · 4a29c0db
      Jakub Kicinski authored 
      netdev_bpf.flags is the input member for installing the program.
netdev_bpf.prog_flags is the output member for querying.  Set
the correct one on query.

Fixes: 92f0292b ("net: xdp: report flags program was installed with on query")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarQuentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      4a29c0db
    • Jakub Kicinski's avatar
      libbpf: fix Makefile exit code if libelf not found · 21567ede
      Jakub Kicinski authored 
      /bin/sh's exit does not recognize -1 as a number, leading to
the following error message:

/bin/sh: 1: exit: Illegal number: -1

Use 1 as the exit code.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarQuentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      21567ede
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      Merge branch 'bpf-to-bpf-function-calls' · ef9fde06
      Daniel Borkmann authored 
      Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
First of all huge thank you to Daniel, John, Jakub, Edward and others who
reviewed multiple iterations of this patch set over the last many months
and to Dave and others who gave critical feedback during netconf/netdev.

The patch is solid enough and we thought through numerous corner cases,
but it's not the end. More followups with code reorg and features to follow.

TLDR: Allow arbitrary function calls from bpf function to another bpf function.

Since the beginning of bpf all bpf programs were represented as a single function
and program authors were forced to use always_inline for all functions
in their C code. That was causing llvm to unnecessary inflate the code size
and forcing developers to move code to header files with little code reuse.

With a bit of additional complexity teach verifier to recognize
arbitrary function calls from one bpf function to another as long as
all of functions are presented to the verifier as a single bpf program.
Extended program layout:
..
r1 = ..    // arg1
r2 = ..    // arg2
call pc+1  // function call pc-relative
exit
.. = r1    // access arg1
.. = r2    // access arg2
..
call pc+20 // second level of function call
...

It allows for better optimized code and finally allows to introduce
the core bpf libraries that can be reused in different projects,
since programs are no longer limited by single elf file.
With function calls bpf can be compiled into multiple .o files.

This patch is the first step. It detects programs that contain
multiple functions and checks that calls between them are valid.
It splits the sequence of bpf instructions (one program) into a set
of bpf functions that call each other. Calls to only known
functions are allowed. Since all functions are presented to
the verifier at once conceptually it is 'static linking'.

Future plans:
- introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_LIBRARY and allow a set of bpf functions
  to be loaded into the kernel that can be later linked to other
  programs with concrete program types. Aka 'dynamic linking'.

- introduce function pointer type and indirect calls to allow
  bpf functions call other dynamically loaded bpf functions while
  the caller bpf function is already executing. Aka 'runtime linking'.
  This will be more generic and more flexible alternative
  to bpf_tail_calls.

FAQ:
Q: Interpreter and JIT changes mean that new instruction is introduced ?
A: No. The call instruction technically stays the same. Now it can call
   both kernel helpers and other bpf functions.
   Calling convention stays the same as well.
   From uapi point of view the call insn got new 'relocation' BPF_PSEUDO_CALL
   similar to BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD 'relocation' of bpf_ldimm64 insn.

Q: What had to change on LLVM side?
A: Trivial LLVM patch to allow calls was applied to upcoming 6.0 release:
   https://reviews.llvm.org/rL318614
   with few bugfixes as well.
   Make sure to build the latest llvm to have bpf_call support.

More details in the patches.
====================
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      ef9fde06
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      selftests/bpf: additional bpf_call tests · 28ab173e
      Daniel Borkmann authored 
      Add some additional checks for few more corner cases.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      28ab173e
    • Alexei Starovoitov's avatar
      bpf: arm64: add JIT support for multi-function programs · db496944
      Alexei Starovoitov authored 
      similar to x64 add support for bpf-to-bpf calls.
When program has calls to in-kernel helpers the target call offset
is known at JIT time and arm64 architecture needs 2 passes.
With bpf-to-bpf calls the dynamically allocated function start
is unknown until all functions of the program are JITed.
Therefore (just like x64) arm64 JIT needs one extra pass over
the program to emit correct call offsets.

Implementation detail:
Avoid being too clever in 64-bit immediate moves and
always use 4 instructions (instead of 3-4 depending on the address)
to make sure only one extra pass is needed.
If some future optimization would make it worth while to optimize
'call 64-bit imm' further, the JIT would need to do 4 passes
over the program instead of 3 as in this patch.
For typical bpf program address the mov needs 3 or 4 insns,
so unconditional 4 insns to save extra pass is a worthy trade off
at this state of JIT.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      db496944
    • Alexei Starovoitov's avatar
      bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs · 1c2a088a
      Alexei Starovoitov authored 
      Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to
compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls.
With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls
will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional
last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets.
For example in case of three bpf functions:
main:
  call foo
  call bpf_map_lookup
  exit
foo:
  call bar
  exit
bar:
  exit

We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar()
x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge.
After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions
will be good except call targets, since start addresses of
foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main()
(note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly
during initial passes).
Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch
call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call
bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass.
Additional safety checks are done to make sure this
last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller
than previous pass.

When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions
at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last
pass can change size of the JITed code.

Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off.
x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter.
All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way
since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from
JITs point of view.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      1c2a088a
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7