- 28 May, 2018 40 commits
-
-
David Sterba authored
Preparatory work for the FS_IOC_FSGETXATTR ioctl, basic conversions and checking helpers. Signed-off-by:David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
Converts btrfs_inode::flags to the FS_*_FL flags. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The FS_*_FL flags cannot be easily identified by a prefix but we still need to recognize them so the 'fsflags' should be closer to the naming scheme but again the 'fs' part sounds like it's a filesystem flag. I don't have a better idea for now. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The FS_*_FL flags cannot be easily identified by a variable name prefix but we still need to recognize them so the 'fsflags' should be closer to the naming scheme but again the 'fs' part sounds like it's a filesystem flag. I don't have a better idea for now. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The btrfs inode flag flavour is now simply called 'inode flags' and the vfs inode are i_flags. Signed-off-by: -
Anand Jain authored
Use a local btrfs_fs_devices variable to access the structure. Signed-off-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Delete the uuid_mutex lock here as this thread accesses the btrfs_fs_devices::devices only (counters or called functions do a list traversal). And the device_list_mutex lock is already taken. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
btrfs_dev_replace_finishing updates devices (soruce and target) which are within the btrfs_fs_devices::devices or withint the cloned seed devices (btrfs_fs_devices::seed::devices), so we don't need the global uuid_mutex. The device replace context is also locked by its own locks. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
btrfs_open_devices() is using the uuid_mutex, but as btrfs_open_devices is just limited to openning all the devices under for given fsid, so we don't need uuid_mutex. Instead it should hold the device_list_mutex as it updates the members of the btrfs_fs_devices and btrfs_device and not the whole fs_devs list. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
read_chunk_tree() calls read_one_dev(), but for seed device we have to search the fs_uuids list, so we need the uuid_mutex. Add a comment comment, so that we can improve this part. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Instead of de-referencing the device->fs_devices use cur_devices which points to the same fs_devices and does not change. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
The generic block device lookup or cleanup does not need the uuid mutex, that's only for the device_list_add. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function is no longer used outside of inode.c so just make it static. At the same time give a more becoming name, since it's not really invalidating the inodes but just calling d_prune_alias. Last, but not least - move the function above the sole caller to avoid introducing yet-another-pointless forward declaration. Signed-off-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Use the wrappers and reduce the amount of low-level details about the waitqueue management. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Currently the code assumes that there's an implied barrier by the sequence of code preceding the wakeup, namely the mutex unlock. As Nikolay pointed out: I think this is wrong (not your code) but the original assumption that the RELEASE semantics provided by mutex_unlock is sufficient. According to memory-barriers.txt: Section 'LOCK ACQUISITION FUNCTIONS' states: (2) RELEASE operation implication: Memory operations issued before the RELEASE will be completed before the RELEASE operation has completed. Memory operations issued after the RELEASE *may* be completed before the RELEASE operation has completed. (I've bolded the may portion) The example given there: As an example, consider the following: *A = a; *B = b; ACQUIRE *C = c; *D = d; RELEASE *E = e; *F = f; The following sequence of events is acceptable: ACQUIRE, {*F,*A}, *E, {*C,*D}, *B, RELEASE So if we assume that *C is modifying the flag which the waitqueue is checking, and *E is the actual wakeup, then those accesses can be re-ordered... IMHO this code should be considered broken... --- To be on the safe side, add the barriers. The synchronization logic around log using the mutexes and several other threads does not make it easy to reason for/against the barrier. CC: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6ee068d8-1a69-3728-00d1-d86293d43c9f@suse.comReviewed-by: -
David Sterba authored
Add convenience wrappers for the waitqueue management that involves memory barriers to prevent deadlocks. The helpers will let us remove barriers and the necessary comments in several places. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Under the following case, qgroup rescan can double account cowed tree blocks: In this case, extent tree only has one tree block. - | transid=5 last committed=4 | btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker() | |- btrfs_start_transaction() | | transid = 5 | |- qgroup_rescan_leaf() | |- btrfs_search_slot_for_read() on extent tree | Get the only extent tree block from commit root (transid = 4). | Scan it, set qgroup_rescan_progress to the last | EXTENT/META_ITEM + 1 | now qgroup_rescan_progress = A + 1. | | fs tree get CoWed, new tree block is at A + 16K | transid 5 get committed - | transid=6 last committed=5 | btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker() | btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker() | |- btrfs_start_transaction() | | transid = 5 | |- qgroup_rescan_leaf() | |- btrfs_search_slot_for_read() on extent tree | Get the only extent tree block from commit root (transid = 5). | scan it using qgroup_rescan_progress (A + 1). | found new tree block beyong A, and it's fs tree block, | account it to increase qgroup numbers. - In above case, tree block A, and tree block A + 16K get accounted twice, while qgroup rescan should stop when it already reach the last leaf, other than continue using its qgroup_rescan_progress. Such case could happen by just looping btrfs/017 and with some possibility it can hit such double qgroup accounting problem. Fix it by checking the path to determine if we should finish qgroup rescan, other than relying on next loop to exit. Reported-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
When doing qgroup rescan using the following script (modified from btrfs/017 test case), we can sometimes hit qgroup corruption. ------ umount $dev &> /dev/null umount $mnt &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f -n 64k $dev mount $dev $mnt extent_size=8192 xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite 0 $extent_size" $mnt/foo > /dev/null btrfs subvolume snapshot $mnt $mnt/snap xfs_io -f -c "reflink $mnt/foo" $mnt/foo-reflink > /dev/null xfs_io -f -c "reflink $mnt/foo" $mnt/snap/foo-reflink > /dev/null xfs_io -f -c "reflink $mnt/foo" $mnt/snap/foo-reflink2 > /dev/unll btrfs quota enable $mnt # -W is the new option to only wait rescan while not starting new one btrfs quota rescan -W $mnt btrfs qgroup show -prce $mnt umount $mnt # Need to patch btrfs-progs to report qgroup mismatch as error btrfs check $dev || _fail ------ For fast machine, we can hit some corruption which missed accounting tree blocks: ------ qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child -------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ ----- 0/5 8.00KiB 0.00B none none --- --- 0/257 8.00KiB 0.00B none none --- --- ------ This is due to the fact that we're always searching commit root for btrfs_find_all_roots() at qgroup_rescan_leaf(), but the leaf we get is from current transaction, not commit root. And if our tree blocks get modified in current transaction, we won't find any owner in commit root, thus causing the corruption. Fix it by searching commit root for extent tree for qgroup_rescan_leaf(). Reported-by:
-
Al Viro authored
[spotted while going through ->d_fsdata handling around d_splice_alias(); don't really care which tree that goes through] The only thing even looking at ->d_fsdata in there (since 2012) had been kfree(dentry->d_fsdata) in btrfs_dentry_delete(). Which, incidentally, is all btrfs_dentry_delete() does. Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
There are already 2 reports about strangely corrupted super blocks, where csum still matches but extra garbage gets slipped into super block. The corruption would looks like: ------ superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/sdc1 --------------------------------------------------------- csum_type 41700 (INVALID) csum 0x3b252d3a [match] bytenr 65536 flags 0x1 ( WRITTEN ) magic _BHRfS_M [match] ... incompat_flags 0x5b22400000000169 ( MIXED_BACKREF | COMPRESS_LZO | BIG_METADATA | EXTENDED_IREF | SKINNY_METADATA | unknown flag: 0x5b22400000000000 ) ... ------ Or ------ superblock: bytenr=65536, device=/dev/mapper/x --------------------------------------------------------- csum_type 35355 (INVALID) csum_size 32 csum 0xf0dbeddd [match] bytenr 65536 flags 0x1 ( WRITTEN ) magic _BHRfS_M [match] ... incompat_flags 0x176d200000000169 ( MIXED_BACKREF | COMPRESS_LZO | BIG_METADATA | EXTENDED_IREF | SKINNY_METADATA | unknown flag: 0x176d200000000000 ) ------ Obviously, csum_type and incompat_flags get some garbage, but its csum still matches, which means kernel calculates the csum based on corrupted super block memory. And after manually fixing these values, the filesystem is completely healthy without any problem exposed by btrfs check. Although the cause is still unknown, at least detect it and prevent further corruption. Both reports have same symptoms, there's an overwrite on offset 192 of the superblock, by 4 bytes. The superblock structure is not allocated or freed and stays in the memory for the whole filesystem lifetime, so it's not a use-after-free kind of error on someone else's leaked page. As a vague point for the problable cause is mentioning of other system freezing related to graphic card drivers. Reported-by:Ken Swenson <flat@imo.uto.moe> Reported-by:
Ben Parsons <9parsonsb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Refactor btrfs_check_super_valid: 1) Rename it to btrfs_validate_mount_super() Now it's more obvious when the function should be called. 2) Extract core check routine into validate_super() Later write time check can reuse it, and if needed, we could also use validate_super() to check each super block. 3) Add more comments about btrfs_validate_mount_super() Mostly about what it doesn't check and when it should be called. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Move btrfs_check_super_valid() before its single caller to avoid forward declaration. Though such code motion is not recommended as it pollutes git history, in this case the following patches would need to add new forward declarations for static functions that we want to avoid. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function always takes a transaction handle which contains a reference to the fs_info. Use that and remove the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function takes a transaction handle which already contains a reference to the fs_info. So use it and remove the extra function argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function alreay takes a transaction handle which holds a reference to the fs_info. Use that and remove the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function takes a transaction handle which holds a reference to fs_info. So use that and remove the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function takes a transaction handle which already has a reference to the fs_info. Use it and remove the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function always takes a transaction handle which references the fs_info structure. So use that and remove the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function already takes a transaction which has a reference to the fs_info. So use that and remove the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function already takes a transaction handle which has a reference to the fs_info. So use that and remove the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function always takes a transaction handle which contains a reference to fs_info. So use that and kill the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function already takes a transaction handle which contains a reference to fs_info. So use that and remove the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function always takes a trans handle which contains a reference to the fs_info. Use that and remove the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function also takes a btrfs_block_group_cache which contains a referene to the fs_info. So use that and remove the extra argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function already takes trans handle from where fs_info can be referenced. Remove the redundant parameter. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function already takes a transaction handle which contains a reference to fs_info. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function already takes a transaction handle which has a reference to the fs_info. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
We also pass in a transaction handle which has a reference to the fs_info. Just remove the extraneous argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This will be necessary for future cleanups which remove the fs_info argument from some freespace tree functions. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The invariant is that when nr_delalloc_inodes is 0 then the root mustn't have any inodes on its delalloc inodes list. Signed-off-by:
-
