- 21 Mar, 2013 5 commits
-
-
Tsutomu Itoh authored
We should free leaf and root before returning from the error handling code. Signed-off-by:
Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
Jan Schmidt authored
To resolve backrefs, ROOT_REPLACE operations in the tree mod log are required to be tied to at least one KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operation. Therefore, those operations must be enclosed by tree_mod_log_write_lock() and tree_mod_log_write_unlock() calls. Those calls are private to the tree_mod_log_* functions, which means that removal of the elements of an old root node must be logged from tree_mod_log_insert_root. This partly reverts and corrects commit ba1bfbd5 (Btrfs: fix a tree mod logging issue for root replacement operations). This fixes the brand-new version of xfstest 276 as of commit cfe73f71. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Steps to reproduce: mkfs.btrfs <disk> mount <disk> <mnt> btrfs quota enable <mnt> btrfs sub create <mnt>/subv btrfs qgroup limit 10M <mnt>/subv fallocate --length 20M <mnt>/subv/data For the above example, fallocating will return successfully which is not expected, we try to fix it by doing qgroup reservation before fallocating. Signed-off-by:
Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
If you restore a btrfs-image file system and try to mount that file system we'll panic. That's because btrfs-image restores and just makes one big chunk to envelope the whole disk, since they are really only meant to be messed with by our btrfs-progs. So fix up btrfs_rmap_block and the callers of it for mount so that we no longer panic but instead just return an error and fail to mount. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Now that we use bit operation to check fs_state, update btrfs_free_fs_root()'s checker, otherwise we get back to memory leak case. Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 16 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Liu Bo authored
Users report that an extent map's list is still linked when it's actually going to be freed from cache. The story is that a) when we're going to drop an extent map and may split this large one into smaller ems, and if this large one is flagged as EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING which means that it's on the list to be logged, then the smaller ems split from it will also be flagged as EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING, and this is _not_ expected. b) we'll keep ems from unlinking the list and freeing when they are flagged with EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING, because the log code holds one reference. The end result is the warning, but the truth is that we set the flag EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING only during fsync. So clear flag EXTENT_FLAG_LOGGING for extent maps split from a large one. Reported-by:
Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@fem.tu-ilmenau.de> Reported-by:
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 14 Mar, 2013 6 commits
-
-
Liu Bo authored
Creating snapshot passes extent_root to commit its transaction, but it can lead to the warning of checking root for quota in the __btrfs_end_transaction() when someone else is committing the current transaction. Since we've recorded the needed root in trans_handle, just use it to get rid of the warning. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
If one of qgroup fails to reserve firstly, we should return immediately, it is unnecessary to continue check. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
The callers of lookup_inline_extent_info all handle getting an error back properly, so return an error if we have corruption instead of being a jerk and panicing. Still WARN_ON() since this is kind of crucial and I've been seeing it a bit too much recently for my taste, I think we're doing something wrong somewhere. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Eric Sandeen authored
Doing this would reliably fail with -EBUSY for me: # mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/scratch; umount /mnt/scratch; mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb2 ... unable to open /dev/sdb2: Device or resource busy because mkfs.btrfs tries to open the device O_EXCL, and somebody still has it. Using systemtap to track bdev gets & puts shows a kworker thread doing a blkdev put after mkfs attempts a get; this is left over from the unmount path: btrfs_close_devices __btrfs_close_devices call_rcu(&device->rcu, free_device); free_device INIT_WORK(&device->rcu_work, __free_device); schedule_work(&device->rcu_work); so unmount might complete before __free_device fires & does its blkdev_put. Adding an rcu_barrier() to btrfs_close_devices() causes unmount to wait until all blkdev_put()s are done, and the device is truly free once unmount completes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Remove a useless function declaration Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Using spinning case instead of blocking will result in better concurrency overall. Signed-off-by:
-
- 07 Mar, 2013 3 commits
-
-
Chris Mason authored
The delayed inode code batches up changes to the btree in hopes of doing them in bulk. As the changes build up, processes kick off worker threads and wait for them to make progress. The current code kicks off an async work queue item for each delayed node, which creates a lot of churn. It also uses a fixed 1 HZ waiting period for the throttle, which allows us to build a lot of pending work and can slow down the commit. This changes us to watch a sequence counter as it is bumped during the operations. We kick off fewer work items and have each work item do more work. Signed-off-by: -
Ilya Dryomov authored
Raid56 merge (merge commit e942f883) had mistakenly removed a call to __cancel_balance(), which resulted in balance not cleaning up after itself after a successful finish. (Cleanup includes switching the state, removing the balance item and releasing mut_ex_op testnset lock.) Bring it back. Reported-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into for-linus-3.9
-
- 05 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Chris Mason authored
Commit 24542bf7 changed preallocation of extents to cap the max size we try to allocate. It's a valid change, but the extent reservation code is also used by balance, and that can't tolerate a smaller extent being allocated. __btrfs_prealloc_file_range already has a min_size parameter, which is used by relocation to request a specific extent size. This commit adds an extra check to enforce that minimum extent size. Signed-off-by:
Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
- 04 Mar, 2013 10 commits
-
-
Stefan Behrens authored
Commit 5ac00add added a testnset mutex and code that disallows running administrative tasks in parallel. It is prevented that the device add/delete/balance/replace/resize operations are started in parallel. By mistake, the defragmentation operation was included in the check for mutually exclusiveness as well. This is fixed with this commit. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Only let one trans handle to wait for other handles, otherwise we will get ABBA issues. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Btrfs balance can easily hit BUG_ON in these places, but we want to it bail out gracefully after we force the whole filesystem to readonly. So we use btrfs_std_error hook in place of BUG_ON. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
We can bail out from here gracefully instead of a cold BUG_ON. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
We've missed the 'free blocks' part on ENOMEM error. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
We first use btrfs_std_error hook to replace with BUG_ON, and we also need to cleanup what is left, including reloc roots rbtree and reloc roots list. Here we use a helper function to cleanup both rbtree and list, and since this function can also be used in the balance recover path, we also make the change as well to keep code simple. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Add a check for NULL pointer to avoid invalid reference. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
If the async transaction commitment failed, we need close the current transaction handler, or the current transaction will be blocked to commit because of this orphan handler. We fix the problem by doing sync transaction commitment, that is to invoke btrfs_commit_transaction(). Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
There are several bugs at error path of create_snapshot() when the transaction commitment failed. - access the freed transaction handler. At the end of the transaction commitment, the transaction handler was freed, so we should not access it after the transaction commitment. - we were not aware of the error which happened during the snapshot creation if we submitted a async transaction commitment. - pending snapshot access vs pending snapshot free. when something wrong happened after we submitted a async transaction commitment, the transaction committer would cleanup the pending snapshots and free them. But the snapshot creators were not aware of it, they would access the freed pending snapshots. This patch fixes the above problems by: - remove the dangerous code that accessed the freed handler - assign ->error if the error happens during the snapshot creation - the transaction committer doesn't free the pending snapshots, just assigns the error number and evicts them before we unblock the transaction. Reported-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We need to inc the nlink of deleted entries when running replay so we can do the unlink on the fs_root and get everything cleaned up and then have the orphan cleanup do the right thing. The problem is inc_nlink complains about this, even thought it still does the right thing. So use set_nlink() if our i_nlink is 0 to keep users from seeing the warnings during log replay. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
- 03 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Geert Uytterhoeven authored
tilegx_defconfig: fs/btrfs/raid56.c: In function 'btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table': fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] fs/btrfs/raid56.c:206:9: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] fs/btrfs/raid56.c:226:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Signed-off-by:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by:
-
- 01 Mar, 2013 8 commits
-
-
Paul Gortmaker authored
We want to avoid module.h where posible, since it in turn includes nearly all of header space. This means removing it where it is not required, and using export.h where we are only exporting symbols via EXPORT_SYMBOL and friends. Signed-off-by:
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Apparently when we do inline extents we allow the data to overlap the last chunk of the btrfs_file_extent_item, which means that we can possibly have a btrfs_file_extent_item that isn't actually as large as a btrfs_file_extent_item. This messes with us when we try to overwrite the extent when logging new extents since we expect for it to be the right size. To fix this just delete the item and try to do the insert again which will give us the proper sized btrfs_file_extent_item. This fixes a panic where map_private_extent_buffer would blow up because we're trying to write past the end of the leaf. Thanks, Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The stripe hash table is large, starting with allocation order 4 and can go as high as order 7 in case lock debugging is turned on and structure padding happens. Observed mount failure: mount: page allocation failure: order:7, mode:0x200050 Pid: 8234, comm: mount Tainted: G W 3.8.0-default+ #267 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81114353>] warn_alloc_failed+0xf3/0x140 [<ffffffff811171d2>] ? __alloc_pages_direct_compact+0x92/0x250 [<ffffffff81117ac3>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x733/0x9d0 [<ffffffff81152878>] ? cache_alloc_refill+0x3f8/0x840 [<ffffffff811528bc>] cache_alloc_refill+0x43c/0x840 [<ffffffff811302eb>] ? is_kernel_percpu_address+0x4b/0x90 [<ffffffffa00a00ac>] ? btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs] [<ffffffff811531d7>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x247/0x270 [<ffffffffa00a00ac>] btrfs_alloc_stripe_hash_table+0x5c/0x130 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa003133f>] open_ctree+0xb2f/0x1f90 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81397289>] ? string+0x49/0xe0 [<ffffffff813987b3>] ? vsnprintf+0x443/0x5d0 [<ffffffffa0007cb6>] btrfs_mount+0x526/0x600 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8115127c>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after+0x4c/0x200 [<ffffffff81162b90>] mount_fs+0x20/0xe0 [<ffffffff8117db26>] vfs_kern_mount+0x76/0x120 [<ffffffff811801b6>] do_mount+0x386/0x980 [<ffffffff8112a5cb>] ? strndup_user+0x5b/0x80 [<ffffffff81180840>] sys_mount+0x90/0xe0 [<ffffffff81962e99>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
The original code is a little confusing and not clear, The right way to deal with the kernel code like this: [...] if (ret) goto out; [...] So i move the common clean_up code to the place labeled with out_fail, this will be easier to maintain. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
commit eb6b88d9 leads into another bug. If it is just because qgroup_reserve fails, the function btrfs_qgroup_free should not be called, otherwise, it will cause the wrong quota accounting. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
The check work has been done just before the function btrfs_clean_quota_tree is called, it is not necessary to check it again, remove it. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Return ENOMEM rather trigger BUG_ON, fix it. Signed-off-by:
Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Steps to reproduce: i=0 ncases=100 mkfs.btrfs <disk> mount <disk> <mnt> btrfs quota enable <mnt> btrfs qgroup create 2/1 <mnt> while [ $i -le $ncases ] do btrfs qgroup create 1/$i <mnt> btrfs qgroup assign 1/$i 2/1 <mnt> i=$(($i+1)) done btrfs quota disable <mnt> umount <mnt> btrfsck <mnt> You can also use the commands: btrfs-debug-tree <disk> | grep QGROUP You will find there are still items existed.The reasons why this happens is because the original code just checks slots[0]==0 and returns. We try to fix it by deleting the leaf one by one. Signed-off-by:
-
- 28 Feb, 2013 5 commits
-
-
David Sterba authored
The nodesize is capped at 64k and there are enough pages preallocated in extent_buffer::inline_pages. The fallback to kmalloc never happened because even on the smallest page size considered (4k) inline_pages covered the needs. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
When deleting a snapshot/subvolume, we need remove root ref/backref, dir entries and update the dir inode, so we must reserve free space for those operations. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
There are two problems in the space reservation of the snapshot/ subvolume creation. - don't reserve the space for the root item insertion - the space which is reserved in the qgroup is different with the free space reservation. we need reserve free space for 7 items, but in qgroup reservation, we need reserve space only for 3 items. So we implement new metadata reservation functions for the snapshot/subvolume creation. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Since we have grabbed the parent inode at the beginning of the snapshot creation, and both sync and async snapshot creation release it after the pending snapshots are actually created, it is safe to access the parent inode directly during the snapshot creation, we needn't use dget_parent/dput to fix the parent dentry and get the dir inode. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Dave pointed out that he saw messages from btrfs although there was no such filesystem on his computers. The automatic device scan is called on every new blockdevice if the usual distro udev rule set is used. The printk introduced in 6f60cbd3 was a remainder from copying portions of code from btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb which is used under different conditions and the warning makes sense there. Reported-by:
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
