- 13 Apr, 2023 21 commits
-
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com> Suggested-by:
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@fujitsu.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@fujitsu.com> Cc: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@fujitsu.com> Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
Eric Curtin <ecurtin@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi@fujitsu.com> Cc: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st> Cc: Sven Peter <sven@svenpeter.dev> Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Cc: asahi@lists.linux.dev Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Nick Alcock authored
Since commit 8b41fc44 ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as modules. Signed-off-by:
-
- 24 Mar, 2023 19 commits
-
-
Bagas Sanjaya authored
Commit d6f819908f8aac ("module: fold usermode helper kmod into modules directory") moves kmod helper implementation (kmod.c) to kernel/module/ directory but forgets to update its reference on kernel api doc, hence: WARNING: kernel-doc './scripts/kernel-doc -rst -enable-lineno -sphinx-version 2.4.4 -export ./kernel/kmod.c' failed with return code 2 Update the reference. Fixes: d6f819908f8aac ("module: fold usermode helper kmod into modules directory") Reported-by:Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20230324154413.19cc78be@canb.auug.org.au/Signed-off-by:
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Liam Beguin <liambeguin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jim Cromie authored
already_uses() is unnecessarily chatty. `modprobe i915` yields 491 messages like: [ 64.108744] i915 uses drm! This is a normal situation, and isn't worth all the log entries. NOTE: I've preserved the "does not use %s" messages, which happens less often, but does happen. Its not clear to me what it tells a reader, or what info might improve the pr_debug's utility. [ 6847.584999] main:already_uses:569: amdgpu does not use ttm! [ 6847.585001] main:add_module_usage:584: Allocating new usage for amdgpu. [ 6847.585014] main:already_uses:569: amdgpu does not use drm! [ 6847.585016] main:add_module_usage:584: Allocating new usage for amdgpu. [ 6847.585024] main:already_uses:569: amdgpu does not use drm_display_helper! [ 6847.585025] main:add_module_usage:584: Allocating new usage for amdgpu. [ 6847.585084] main:already_uses:569: amdgpu does not use drm_kms_helper! [ 6847.585086] main:add_module_usage:584: Allocating new usage for amdgpu. [ 6847.585175] main:already_uses:569: amdgpu does not use drm_buddy! [ 6847.585176] main:add_module_usage:584: Allocating new usage for amdgpu. [ 6847.585202] main:already_uses:569: amdgpu does not use i2c_algo_bit! [ 6847.585204] main:add_module_usage:584: Allocating new usage for amdgpu. [ 6847.585249] main:already_uses:569: amdgpu does not use gpu_sched! [ 6847.585250] main:add_module_usage:584: Allocating new usage for amdgpu. [ 6847.585314] main:already_uses:569: amdgpu does not use video! [ 6847.585315] main:add_module_usage:584: Allocating new usage for amdgpu. [ 6847.585409] main:already_uses:569: amdgpu does not use iommu_v2! [ 6847.585410] main:add_module_usage:584: Allocating new usage for amdgpu. [ 6847.585816] main:already_uses:569: amdgpu does not use drm_ttm_helper! [ 6847.585818] main:add_module_usage:584: Allocating new usage for amdgpu. [ 6848.762268] dyndbg: add-module: amdgpu.2533 sites no functional changes. Signed-off-by:
Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jim Cromie authored
move_module() pr_debug's "Final section addresses for $modname". Add section addresses to the message, for anyone looking at these. no functional changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Jim Cromie authored
The pr_debug("Absolute symbol" ..) reports value, (which is usually 0), but not the name, which is more informative. So add it. no functional changes Signed-off-by: -
Jim Cromie authored
layout_sections() and move_module() each issue ~50 messages for each module loaded. Add mod-name into their 2 header lines, to help the reader find his module. no functional changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Luis Chamberlain authored
The kernel/kmod.c is already only built if we enabled modules, so just stuff it under kernel/module/kmod.c and unify the MAINTAINERS file for it. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
The setup_load_info() was actually had ELF validation checks of its own. To later cache useful variables as an secondary step just means looping again over the ELF sections we just validated. We can simply keep tabs of the key sections of interest as we validate the module ELF section in one swoop, so do that and merge the two routines together. Expand a bit on the documentation / intent / goals. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
The symbol and strings section validation currently happen in setup_load_info() but since they are also doing validity checks move this to elf_validity_check(). Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
The integrity of the struct module we load is important, and although our ELF validator already checks that the module section must match struct module, add a stop-gap check before we memcpy() the final minted module. This also makes those inspecting the code what the goal is. While at it, clarify the goal behind updating the sh_addr address. The current comment is pretty misleading. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
The ELF ".gnu.linkonce.this_module" section is special, it is what we use to construct the struct module __this_module, which THIS_MODULE points to. When userspace loads a module we always deal first with a copy of the userspace buffer, and twiddle with the userspace copy's version of the struct module. Eventually we allocate memory to do a memcpy() of that struct module, under the assumption that the module size is right. But we have no validity checks against the size or the requirements for the section. Add some validity checks for the special module section early and while at it, cache the module section index early, so we don't have to do that later. While at it, just move over the assigment of the info->mod to make the code clearer. The validity checker also adds an explicit size check to ensure the module section size matches the kernel's run time size for sizeof(struct module). This should prevent sloppy loads of modules which are built today *without* actually increasing the size of the struct module. A developer today can for example expand the size of struct module, rebuild a directoroy 'make fs/xfs/' for example and then try to insmode the driver there. That module would in effect have an incorrect size. This new size check would put a stop gap against such mistakes. This also makes the entire goal of ".gnu.linkonce.this_module" pretty clear. Before this patch verification of the goal / intent required some Indian Jones whips, torches and cleaning up big old spider webs. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
This makes the routine easier to understand what the check its checking for. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
Converge on a compromise: so long as we have a module hit our linked list of modules we taint. That is, the module was about to become live. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
Just move the signature taint into the helper: module_augment_kernel_taints() Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
It is silly to have taints spread out all over, we can just compromise and add them if the module ever hit our linked list. Our sanity checkers should just prevent crappy drivers / bogus ELF modules / etc and kconfig options should be enough to let you *not* load things you don't want. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
check_modinfo() actually does two things: a) sanity checks, some of which are fatal, and so we prevent the user from completing trying to load a module b) taints the kernel The taints are pretty heavy handed because we're tainting the kernel *before* we ever even get to load the module into the modules linked list. That is, it it can fail for other reasons later as we review the module's structure. But this commit makes no functional changes, it just makes the intent clearer and splits the code up where needed to make that happen. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
The work to taint the kernel due to a module should be split up eventually. To aid with this, split up the tainting on check_modinfo_livepatch(). This let's us bring more early checks together which do return a value, and makes changes easier to read later where we stuff all the work to do the taints in one single routine. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
The set_license() routine would seem to a reader to do some sort of setting, but it does not. It just adds a taint if the license is not set or proprietary. This makes what the code is doing clearer, so much we can remove the comment about it. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
This moves check_modinfo() to early_mod_check(). This doesn't make any functional changes either, as check_modinfo() was the first call on layout_and_allocate(), so we're just moving it back one routine and at the end. This let's us keep separate the checkers from the allocator. Signed-off-by: -
Luis Chamberlain authored
Move early sanity checkers for the module into a helper. This let's us make it clear when we are working with the local copy of the module prior to allocation. This produces no functional changes, it just makes subsequent changes easier to read. Signed-off-by:
-
