- 05 Jun, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Russell King authored
-
- 02 Jun, 2014 8 commits
-
-
Russell King authored
This does the same as the previous commit, but for the S bit, which also needs to match the initial value which the assembly code used for the same reasons. Again, we add a check for SMP to ensure that the page tables are correctly setup for SMP. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Fix a long standing bug where, for ARMv6+, we don't fully ensure that the C code sets the same cache policy as the assembly code. This was introduced partially by commit 11179d8c ([ARM] 4497/1: Only allow safe cache configurations on ARMv6 and later) and also by adding SMP support. This patch sets the default cache policy based on the flags used by the assembly code, and then ensures that when a cache policy command line argument is used, we verify that on ARMv6, it matches the initial setup. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
We can use the alignment_trap assembly macro here too. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
cr_no_alignment is really only used by the alignment code. Since we no longer change the setting of cr_alignment after boot, we can localise this to alignment.c Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
alignment.c will not be built unless CPU_CP15 is set: config CPU_CP15 bool config CPU_CP15_MMU bool select CPU_CP15 config ALIGNMENT_TRAP bool depends on CPU_CP15_MMU So there's no point having conditionals on CPU_CP15 within this code. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
adjust_cr() is not used anymore, so let's get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Keep all bits of alignment handling together. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Several places open-code this manipulation, let's consolidate this. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 01 Jun, 2014 3 commits
-
-
Laura Abbott authored
memblock is now fully integrated into the kernel and is the prefered method for tracking memory. Rather than reinvent the wheel with meminfo, migrate to using memblock directly instead of meminfo as an intermediate. Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Tested-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Thomas Petazzoni authored
Due to a design incompatibility between the PCIe Marvell controller and the Cortex-A9, stressing PCIe devices with a lot of traffic quickly causes a deadlock. One part of the workaround for this is to have all PCIe regions mapped as strongly-ordered (MT_UNCACHED) instead of the default MT_DEVICE. While the arch_ioremap_caller() mechanism allows sub-architecture code to override ioremap(), used to map PCIe memory regions, there isn't such a mechanism to override the behavior of pci_ioremap_io(). This commit adds the arch_pci_ioremap_mem_type variable, initialized to MT_DEVICE by default, and that sub-architecture code can override. We have chosen to expose a single variable rather than offering the possibility of overriding the entire pci_ioremap_io(), because implementing pci_ioremap_io() requires calling functions (get_mem_type()) that are private to the arch/arm/mm/ code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Nicolas Pitre authored
A small mistake slipped through in memory.txt. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 30 May, 2014 4 commits
-
-
Lin Yongting authored
When configure kprobe events of ftrace with "stacktrace" option enabled in arm, there is no stacktrace was recorded after the kprobe event was triggered. The root cause is no save_stack_trace_regs() function implemented. Implement the save_stack_trace_regs() function in arm, then ftrace will call this architecture-related function to record the stacktrace into ring buffer. After this fix, stacktrace can be recorded, for example: # mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug # echo "p:netrx net_rx_action" >> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/netrx/enable # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/options/stacktrace # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on # ping 127.0.0.1 -c 1 # echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace # tracer: nop # # entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 12/12 #P:1 # # _-----=> irqs-off # / _----=> need-resched # | / _---=> hardirq/softirq # || / _--=> preempt-depth # ||| / delay # TASK-PID CPU# |||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION # | | | |||| | | <------ missing some entries ----------------> ping-1200 [000] dNs1 667.603250: netrx: (net_rx_action+0x0/0x1f8) ping-1200 [000] dNs1 667.604738: <stack trace> => net_rx_action => do_softirq => local_bh_enable => ip_finish_output => ip_output => ip_local_out => ip_send_skb => ip_push_pending_frames => raw_sendmsg => inet_sendmsg => sock_sendmsg => SyS_sendto => ret_fast_syscall Signed-off-by: Lin Yongting <linyongting@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Paul Bolle authored
Support for ARM710 CPUs was removed in v3.5. Now remove the last code depending on its Kconfig macro. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Arun K S authored
We will reach fixup handler when one thread(say cpu0) caused an undefined exception, while another thread(say cpu1) is unmmaping the page. Fixup handler returns to the next userspace instruction which has caused the undef execption, rather than going to the same instruction. ARM ARM says that after undefined exception, the PC will be pointing to the next instruction. ie +4 offset in case of ARM and +2 in case of Thumb And there is no correction offset passed to vector_stub in case of undef exception. File: arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +1085 vector_stub und, UND_MODE During an undefined exception, in normal scenario(ie when ldrt instruction does not cause an abort) after resorting the context in VFP hardware, the PC is modified as show below before jumping to ret_from_exception which is in r9. File: arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S +169 @ The context stored in the VFP hardware is up to date with this thread vfp_hw_state_valid: tst r1, #FPEXC_EX bne process_exception @ might as well handle the pending @ exception before retrying branch @ out before setting an FPEXC that @ stops us reading stuff VFPFMXR FPEXC, r1 @ Restore FPEXC last sub r2, r2, #4 @ Retry current instruction - if Thumb str r2, [sp, #S_PC] @ mode it's two 16-bit instructions, @ else it's one 32-bit instruction, so @ always subtract 4 from the following @ instruction address. But if ldrt results in an abort, we reach the fixup handler and return to ret_from_execption without correcting the pc. This patch modifes the fixup handler to re-execute the same instruction which caused undefined execption. Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinayakm.list@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Arun KS <getarunks@gmail.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Will Deacon authored
asm-generic offers an atomic-add based rwsem implementation, which can avoid the need for heavier, spinlock-based synchronisation on the fast path. This patch makes use of the optimised implementation for ARM CPUs. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 29 May, 2014 24 commits
-
-
Russell King authored
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
As we have now removed all instances of the L2C-310 having its cache size "modified" via platform/SoC code, discourage new cases showing up by printing a warning. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
We no longer need or require the .set_debug method; we handle everything it used to do via the .write_sec method instead. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
L2X0_AUX_CTRL_MASK is not useful for PL310s. It would be better if people thought about their value for this rather than cargo-cult programming. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Remove the explicit call to l2x0_of_init(), converting to the generic infrastructure instead. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
The cache size should already be present in the L2 cache auxiliary control register: it is part of the integration process to configure the hardware IP. Most platforms get this right, yet still many cargo-cult program, and assume that they always need specifying to the L2 cache code. Remove them so we can find out which really need this. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Remove the explicit call to l2x0_of_init(), converting to the generic infrastructure instead. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
It is beneficial to have the L2 cache up and running earlier in the system boot. Not only will this allow for simpler code when we come to enable some features, but it also means that we get a more accurate bogomips value for the udelay() loop. Calibrating the loop with the L2 cache off, and then running with the L2 cache on is not the best idea. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
ux500 can't change the auxiliary control register, so there's no point passing values to try and modify it to the l2x0 init functions. Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
The cache size should already be present in the L2 cache auxiliary control register: it is part of the integration process to configure the hardware IP. Most platforms get this right, yet still many cargo-cult program, and assume that they always need specifying to the L2 cache code. Remove them so we can find out which really need this. Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
ux500 can't write to any of the secure registers on the L2C controllers, so provide a dummy handler which ignores all writes. Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Remove the explicit call to l2x0_of_init(), converting to the generic infrastructure instead. Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
The cache size should already be present in the L2 cache auxiliary control register: it is part of the integration process to configure the hardware IP. Most platforms get this right, yet still many cargo-cult program, and assume that they always need specifying to the L2 cache code. Remove them so we can find out which really need this. Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Remove the explicit call to l2x0_of_init(), converting to the generic infrastructure instead. We can remove the .init_machine as it becomes the same as the generic version. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
The cache size should already be present in the L2 cache auxiliary control register: it is part of the integration process to configure the hardware IP. Most platforms get this right, yet still many cargo-cult program, and assume that they always need specifying to the L2 cache code. Remove them so we can find out which really need this. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Remove the explicit call to l2x0_of_init(), converting to the generic infrastructure instead. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
The cache size should already be present in the L2 cache auxiliary control register: it is part of the integration process to configure the hardware IP. Most platforms get this right, yet still many cargo-cult program, and assume that they always need specifying to the L2 cache code. Remove them so we can find out which really need this. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Remove the explicit call to l2x0_of_init(), converting to the generic infrastructure instead. This also allows us to eliminate the .init_machine function as this becomes the same as the generic version. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Add better commentry about the L2 cache requirements on these platforms. Unfortunately, the auxiliary control register is not pre-set to indicate the correct cache parameters, so we have to manually program these. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
Remove the explicit call to l2x0_of_init(), converting to the generic infrastructure instead. Along with this change, we can delete l2x0.c from prima2. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Russell King authored
The cache size should already be present in the L2 cache auxiliary control register: it is part of the integration process to configure the hardware IP. Most platforms get this right, yet still many cargo-cult program, and assume that they always need specifying to the L2 cache code. Remove them so we can find out which really need this. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
Sekhar Nori authored
Add support for L2 cache controller (PL310) on AM437x SoC. Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-