1. 08 Dec, 2022 2 commits
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      selftests/bpf: convert dynptr_fail and map_kptr_fail subtests to generic tester · 26c386ec
      Andrii Nakryiko authored
      Convert big chunks of dynptr and map_kptr subtests to use generic
      verification_tester. They are switched from using manually maintained
      tables of test cases, specifying program name and expected error
      verifier message, to btf_decl_tag-based annotations directly on
      corresponding BPF programs: __failure to specify that BPF program is
      expected to fail verification, and __msg() to specify expected log
      message.
      Acked-by: default avatarJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: default avatarKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207201648.2990661-2-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      26c386ec
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      selftests/bpf: add generic BPF program tester-loader · 537c3f66
      Andrii Nakryiko authored
      It's become a common pattern to have a collection of small BPF programs
      in one BPF object file, each representing one test case. On user-space
      side of such tests we maintain a table of program names and expected
      failure or success, along with optional expected verifier log message.
      
      This works, but each set of tests reimplement this mundane code over and
      over again, which is a waste of time for anyone trying to add a new set
      of tests. Furthermore, it's quite error prone as it's way too easy to miss
      some entries in these manually maintained test tables (as evidences by
      dynptr_fail tests, in which ringbuf_release_uninit_dynptr subtest was
      accidentally missed; this is fixed in next patch).
      
      So this patch implements generic test_loader, which accepts skeleton
      name and handles the rest of details: opens and loads BPF object file,
      making sure each program is tested in isolation. Optionally each test
      case can specify expected BPF verifier log message. In case of failure,
      tester makes sure to report verifier log, but it also reports verifier
      log in verbose mode unconditionally.
      
      Now, the interesting deviation from existing custom implementations is
      the use of btf_decl_tag attribute to specify expected-to-fail vs
      expected-to-succeed markers and, optionally, expected log message
      directly next to BPF program source code, eliminating the need to
      manually create and update table of tests.
      
      We define few macros wrapping btf_decl_tag with a convention that all
      values of btf_decl_tag start with "comment:" prefix, and then utilizing
      a very simple "just_some_text_tag" or "some_key_name=<value>" pattern to
      define things like expected success/failure, expected verifier message,
      extra verifier log level (if necessary). This approach is demonstrated
      by next patch in which two existing sets of failure tests are converted.
      
      Tester supports both expected-to-fail and expected-to-succeed programs,
      though this patch set didn't convert any existing expected-to-succeed
      programs yet, as existing tests couple BPF program loading with their
      further execution through attach or test_prog_run. One way to allow
      testing scenarios like this would be ability to specify custom callback,
      executed for each successfully loaded BPF program. This is left for
      follow up patches, after some more analysis of existing test cases.
      
      This test_loader is, hopefully, a start of a test_verifier-like runner,
      but integrated into test_progs infrastructure. It will allow much better
      "user experience" of defining low-level verification tests that can take
      advantage of all the libbpf-provided nicety features on BPF side: global
      variables, declarative maps, etc.  All while having a choice of defining
      it in C or as BPF assembly (through __attribute__((naked)) functions and
      using embedded asm), depending on what makes most sense in each
      particular case. This will be explored in follow up patches as well.
      Acked-by: default avatarJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207201648.2990661-1-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      537c3f66
  2. 07 Dec, 2022 15 commits
  3. 06 Dec, 2022 8 commits
  4. 05 Dec, 2022 6 commits
  5. 04 Dec, 2022 5 commits
  6. 03 Dec, 2022 2 commits
  7. 02 Dec, 2022 2 commits