- 31 May, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Dinghao Liu authored
pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even when it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on the error handling path to keep the counter balanced. Signed-off-by:
Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> Signed-off-by:
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200522104008.28340-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn
-
Dinghao Liu authored
There is no reason that the failure of __gpmi_enable_clk() could lead to PM usage counter decrement. Signed-off-by:
-
Dinghao Liu authored
pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even when it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on the error handling path to keep the counter balanced. Signed-off-by:
-
Boris Brezillon authored
Let's convert the driver to exec_op() to have one less driver relying on the legacy interface. Signed-off-by:
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> Tested-by:
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Boris Brezillon authored
The rb-gpios semantics was undocumented and qi,lb60 (along with the ingenic driver) got it wrong. The active state encodes the NAND ready state, which is high level. Since there's no signal inverter on this board, it should be active-high. Let's fix that here for older DTs so we can re-use the generic nand_gpio_waitrdy() helper, and be consistent with what other drivers do. Suggested-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. Fixes: 1fef62c1 ("mtd: nand: add sunxi NAND flash controller support") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@st.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200519130035.1883-53-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense. Fixes: d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
nand_cleanup() is supposed to be called on error after a successful call to nand_scan() to free all NAND resources. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible, hence pointing it as the commit to fix for backporting purposes, even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
oxnans_nand_remove() should release all MTD devices and clean all NAND devices, not only the first one registered. Fixes: 66859249 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
On error, the oxnas probe path just frees the device which failed and aborts the probe, leaving unreleased resources. Fix this situation by calling mtd_device_unregister()/nand_cleanup() on these. Fixes: 66859249 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. While at it, be consistent and move the function call in the error path thanks to a goto statement. Fixes: 66859249 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
All initialized and registered devices should be listed somewhere so that we can unregister/free them in the _remove() path. This patch is not a fix per-se but is needed to apply three other fixes coming right after, explaining the Fixes/Cc: stable tags. Fixes: 66859249 ("mtd: nand: Add OX820 NAND Support") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates by far the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
This helper is not very useful and very often people get confused: they use nand_release() instead of nand_cleanup(). Let's stop using nand_release() by calling mtd_device_unregister() and nand_cleanup() directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Miquel Raynal authored
nand_release() is supposed be called after MTD device registration. Here, only nand_scan() happened, so use nand_cleanup() instead. There is no real Fixes tag applying here as the use of nand_release() in this driver predates the introduction of nand_cleanup() in commit d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") which makes this change possible. However, pointing this commit as the culprit for backporting purposes makes sense even if this commit is not introducing any bug. Fixes: d44154f9 ("mtd: nand: Provide nand_cleanup() function to free NAND related resources") Signed-off-by:
-
