- 12 Apr, 2019 8 commits
-
-
Bob Paauwe authored
Most of the conditional code for ICELAKE also applies to ELKHARTLAKE so use IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11) even for PM and Workarounds for now. v2: - Rename commit (Jose) - Include a wm workaround (Jose and Lucas) - Include display core init (Jose and Lucas) v3: Add a missing case of gen greater-than 11 (Jose) Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by:Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190412180920.22347-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
If cat error is set, we need to clear it by acking it. Further, if it is set, we must not do a normal request for reset. v2: avoid goto (Chris) v3: comment, error format, direct assign (Chris) Bspec: 12567 Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
If the engine says it is ready for reset, it is ready so avoid further dancing and proceed. v2: reg (Chris) v3: request, ack, mask from following patch (Chris) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
On ICL the DMC doesn't reinit combo PHY B so we should not warn about its state being bogus during the display core uninit. Signed-off-by:
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190411143349.17934-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by:
Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
We are no longer calling bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask() when intel{hdmi,dp}_compute_config() succeeds, and instead only call it when those fail. This is fallout from the bool->int .compute_config() conversion which failed to invert the return value check before calling bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask(). Let's just replace it with an early bailout so that it's harder to miss. This restores the correct latency optim setting calculation (which could fix some real failures), and avoids the MISSING_CASE() from bxt_ddi_phy_calc_lane_lat_optim_mask() after intel{hdmi,dp}_compute_config() has failed. Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Fixes: 204474a6 ("drm/i915: Pass down rc in intel_encoder->compute_config()") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109373Signed-off-by:Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
-
Chris Wilson authored
The HW resets it CSB tail pointer on resetting the engine. Most of the time. In case it doesn't (and for system resume) we write the expected value anyway. For extra paranoia, flush the write before we invalidate the cacheline. Signed-off-by:
-
Radhakrishna Sripada authored
RMW is used only in the disable path. Using it in enable path for consistency. Suggested-by:
Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Radhakrishna Sripada authored
No functional change. Renaming the function to reflect the specific WA. Suggested-by:
-
- 11 Apr, 2019 16 commits
-
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
Currently we enable FEC even when DSC is no used. While that is theoretically valid supposedly there isn't much of a benefit from this. But more importantly we do not account for the FEC link bandwidth overhead (2.4%) in the non-DSC link bandwidth computations. So the code may think we have enough bandwidth when we in fact do not. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Fixes: 240999cf ("i915/dp/fec: Add fec_enable to the crtc state.") Signed-off-by:
Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
-
Chris Wilson authored
As intel_runtime_pm_get/_put may be called from any blockable context, we need to avoid allowing reclaim from our mallocs, as we need to avoid tainting any mutexes held by the callers (as they may themselves not allow for allocations as they are taken in the shrinker). <4> [435.339331] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [435.339364] 5.1.0-rc4-CI-Trybot_4116+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [435.339395] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [435.339426] gem_caching/1334 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [435.339456] 000000004505c39b (wakeref#3){+.+.}, at: intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [435.339788] but task is already holding lock: <4> [435.339819] 00000000ee77b4ed (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.24+0x0/0x30 <4> [435.339879] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [435.339918] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [435.339952] -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: <4> [435.339998] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.24+0x24/0x30 <4> [435.340035] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2a/0x290 <4> [435.340311] __print_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref+0x24/0x160 [i915] <4> [435.340590] untrack_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref+0x16e/0x1d0 [i915] <4> [435.340869] intel_runtime_pm_put_unchecked+0xd/0x30 [i915] <4> [435.341147] __intel_wakeref_put_once+0x22/0x40 [i915] <4> [435.341508] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [435.341871] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [435.342226] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [435.342576] retire_work_handler+0x5b/0x70 [i915] <4> [435.342615] process_one_work+0x245/0x610 <4> [435.342646] worker_thread+0x37/0x380 <4> [435.342679] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [435.342714] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 <4> [435.342739] -> #0 (wakeref#3){+.+.}: <4> [435.342788] lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0 <4> [435.342822] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [435.342853] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [435.343151] intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [435.343501] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [435.343851] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [435.344202] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [435.344543] i915_gem_shrink+0xd8/0x5b0 [i915] <4> [435.344835] i915_drop_caches_set+0x17b/0x250 [i915] <4> [435.344877] simple_attr_write+0xb0/0xd0 <4> [435.344911] full_proxy_write+0x51/0x80 <4> [435.344943] vfs_write+0xbd/0x1b0 <4> [435.344972] ksys_write+0x55/0xe0 <4> [435.345002] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x190 <4> [435.345040] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Signed-off-by: -
Chris Wilson authored
During reset, we try and stop the active ring. This has the consequence that we often clobber the RING registers within the context image. When we find an active request, we update the context image to rerun that request (if it was guilty, we replace the hanging user payload with NOPs). However, we were ignoring an active context if the request had completed, with the consequence that the next submission on that request would start with RING_HEAD==0 and not the tail of the previous request, causing all requests still in the ring to be rerun. Rare, but occasionally seen within CI where we would spot that the context seqno would reverse and complain that we were retiring an incomplete request. <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373352us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3640 -> current 3638 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373353us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3642 -> current 3638 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373354us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3644 -> current 3638 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373354us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3646 -> current 3638 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373356us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=2.1, fence 1e95b:3646 (current 3638), prio=4 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373374us : __i915_request_commit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3648 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0d..1 408373377us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=2, tail=3 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0d..1 408373377us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[3]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000, active=0x1 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0d..1 408373378us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3648 -> current 3638 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3..s1 408373378us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 awake?=1, active=5 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0d..1 408373379us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=2.2, fence 1e95b:3648 (current 3638), prio=4 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373381us : i915_reset_engine: rcs0 flags=4 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373382us : execlists_reset_prepare: rcs0: depth<-0 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373390us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=3, tail=4 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373390us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00008002:0x00000002, active=0x1 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373390us : process_csb: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=2.2, fence 1e95b:3648 (current 3640), prio=4 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373401us : intel_engine_stop_cs: rcs0 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0d..1 408373402us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=4, tail=4 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373403us : intel_gpu_reset: engine_mask=1 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0d..1 408373408us : execlists_cancel_port_requests: rcs0:port0 fence 1e95b:3648, (current 3648) <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373442us : intel_engine_cancel_stop_cs: rcs0 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373442us : execlists_reset_finish: rcs0: depth->0 <0> [412.390350] ksoftirq-26 3..s. 408373442us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 awake?=1, active=0 <0> [412.390350] ksoftirq-26 3d.s1 408373443us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=5, tail=5 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373475us : i915_request_retire: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3640, current 3648 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373476us : i915_request_retire: __retire_engine_request(rcs0) fence 1e95b:3640, current 3648 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373494us : __i915_request_commit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3650 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0d..1 408373496us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=5, tail=5 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0d..1 408373496us : __i915_request_submit: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3650 -> current 3648 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0d..1 408373498us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=2.1, fence 1e95b:3650 (current 3648), prio=6 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373500us : i915_request_retire_upto: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3648, current 3648 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373500us : i915_request_retire: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3642, current 3648 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373501us : i915_request_retire: __retire_engine_request(rcs0) fence 1e95b:3642, current 3648 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373514us : i915_request_retire: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3644, current 3648 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373515us : i915_request_retire: __retire_engine_request(rcs0) fence 1e95b:3644, current 3648 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373527us : i915_request_retire: rcs0 fence 1e95b:3646, current 3640 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3..s1 408373569us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 awake?=1, active=1 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373569us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=5, tail=1 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373570us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[0]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000, active=0x1 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373570us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x00000018:0x00000002, active=0x5 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373570us : process_csb: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=2.1, fence 1e95b:3650 (current 3650), prio=6 <0> [412.390350] <idle>-0 3d.s2 408373571us : process_csb: rcs0 completed ctx=2 <0> [412.390350] i915_sel-4613 0.... 408373621us : i915_request_retire: i915_request_retire:253 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(request)) v2: Fixup the cancellation path to drain the CSB and reset the pointers. Signed-off-by: -
Chris Wilson authored
Before causing guc and execlists to diverge further (breaking guc in the process), take a copy of the current reset procedure and make it local to the guc submission backend Signed-off-by:
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
On gen11 writing to read only ppgtt page causes a gpu hang. This behaviour is different than with previous gen where read only ppgtt access is supported. On those, the write is just dropped without visible side effects. Disable ro ppgtt support on gen11 until a solution can be found to bring it into line with its predecessors. References: HSDES#1807136187 References: https://bugzilla.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108569 Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
As i915_requests are put into an RCU-freelist, they may get reused before debugobjects notice them as being freed. On cleanup, explicitly call i915_sw_fence_fini() so that the debugobject is properly tracked. Reported-by:
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
No point in duplicating all this code when we can just use a variable to hold the output bpp (the only thing that differs between the two branches). Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.comk> Signed-off-by:
-
Ville Syrjälä authored
6bpc is only legal for RGB and RAW pixel encodings. For the rest the minimum is 8bpc. Set our lower limit accordingly. Signed-off-by:
Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
Now when we can support variable csb fifo sizes, disable legacy mode. By disabling legacy we hope to get better hw testing coverage by assuming everyone else have switched over. v2: rebase References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110338 Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Kelvin Gardiner <kelvin.gardiner@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
Make csb entry count variable in preparation for larger CSB status FIFO size found on gen11+ hardware. v2: adapt to hwsp access only (Chris) non continuous mmio (Daniele) v3: entries (Chris), fix macro for checkpatch v4: num_entries (Chris) v5: consistency on num_entries Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: -
Mika Kuoppala authored
With gen11 the interrupt registers are shared between 2 engines, with Engine1 instance being upper word and Engine0 instance being lower. Annoyingly gen11 selected the pm interrupts to be in the Engine1 instance. Rectify the situation by shifting the access accordingly, based on gen. v2: comments, warn on overzealous rps_events Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108059 Testcase: igt/i915_pm_rps@min-max-config-loaded Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
There is no video turbo mode for gen11, so don't set it. v2: inline (Chris) v3: brackets (Chris) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
Enable media sampler powergate as recommended. v2: use REG_BIT (Chris) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
On gen11 the recommended rc6 threshold differs from previous gens, apply it. Move the write to a correct spot in sequence. v2: do write in 2b, fix bspec ref (Michal) Bspec: 33149 Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
In order not to inflate gen9 rc6 enabling sequence with gen11 specifics, use a separate function for it. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Consider two tasks that are running in parallel on a pair of engines (vcs0, vcs1), but then must complete on a shared engine (rcs0). To maximise throughput, we want to run the first ready task on rcs0 (i.e. the first task that completes on either of vcs0 or vcs1). When using semaphores, however, we will instead queue onto rcs in submission order. To resolve this incorrect ordering, we want to re-evaluate the priority queue when each of the request is ready. Normally this happens because we only insert into the priority queue requests that are ready, but with semaphores we are inserting ahead of their readiness and to compensate we penalize those tasks with reduced priority (so that tasks that do not need to busywait should naturally be run first). However, given a series of tasks that each use semaphores, the queue degrades into submission fifo rather than readiness fifo, and so to counter this we give a small boost to semaphore users as their dependent tasks are completed (and so we no longer require any busywait prior to running the user task as they are then ready themselves). v2: Fixup irqsave for schedule_lock (Tvrtko) Testcase: igt/gem_exec_schedule/semaphore-codependency Signed-off-by:
-
- 10 Apr, 2019 8 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
On resume, we know that the only pinned contexts in danger of seeing corruption are the kernel context, and so we do not need to walk the list of all GEM contexts as we tracked them on each engine. Signed-off-by:
-
Manasi Navare authored
Currently we use force_dsc_enable to force DSC from IGT, but we dont expose this value to userspace through debugfs. This patch exposes this through the same dsc_fec_support debugfs node per connector so that we can restore its value back after the tests are completed. Suggested-by:
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
There is a chance we can see spurious interrupts in live now. We have more engines enabled and that with more elaborate access patterns with pm and display, increases the chances hardware just makes a social call, without anything to work on. Remove the error as we have tests to actually probe if we really miss interrupt, instead of getting spurious ones. Note that now we do write to intr_dw even with a zero value. This is considered advantegous as the write is an ack that sw is done. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Mika Kuoppala authored
Unlike previous gens, we already hold the irq_lock on entering the rps handler so we can't use it as it is. Make a gen11 specific rps interrupt handler without locking. v2: return early (Chris) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Takashi Iwai authored
snd_hdac_display_power() doesn't handle the concurrent calls carefully enough, and it may lead to the doubly get_power or put_power calls, when a runtime PM and an async work get called in racy way. This patch addresses it by reusing the bus->lock mutex that has been used for protecting the link state change in ext bus code, so that it can protect against racy display state changes. The initialization of bus->lock was moved from snd_hdac_ext_bus_init() to snd_hdac_bus_init() as well accordingly. Testcase: igt/i915_pm_rpm/module-reload #glk-dsi Reported-by:
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Reviewed-by:
-
Jani Nikula authored
Commit 7769db58 ("drm/i915/dp: optimize eDP 1.4+ link config fast and narrow") started to optize the eDP 1.4+ link config, both per spec and as preparation for display stream compression support. Sadly, we again face panels that flat out fail with parameters they claim to support. Revert, and go back to the drawing board. v2: Actually revert to max params instead of just wide-and-slow. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109959 Fixes: 7769db58 ("drm/i915/dp: optimize eDP 1.4+ link config fast and narrow") Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com> Cc: "Lee, Shawn C" <shawn.c.lee@intel.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.0+ Reviewed-by:
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190405075220.9815-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
-
Vandita Kulkarni authored
Re-enable clock gating of DDI clocks. v2: Fix the default ddi clk state for mipi-dsi (Imre) Fixes: 1026bea0 ("drm/i915/icl: Ungate DSI clocks") Signed-off-by:
Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vandita Kulkarni authored
IO enable sequencing needs ddi clocks enabled. These clocks will be gated at a later point in the enable sequence. v2: Fix the commit header (Uma) v3: Remove the redundant read (Ville) Fixes: 949fc52a ("drm/i915/icl: add pll mapping for DSI") Signed-off-by:
-
- 09 Apr, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Circumvent the dance we currently perform to find the preempt_client and lookup its HW context for this engine, as we know we have already pinned the preempt_context on the engine. Signed-off-by:
-
- 08 Apr, 2019 7 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
A couple of machines in the farm show quite frequent errors in the powerwells not being released. Either there is an external agent interferring with the powerwells, or the powerwell doesn't quite behave as we anticipate -- either way, the test is not reliable enough to be enabled by default in CI. It has served its immediate purpose in providing coverage as we made tweaks to forcewake, so keep it available for future testing. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110210Signed-off-by:
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190407192649.14750-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
This interlaced mode restriction applies to all gens, not only to Haswell. Also while at it updating the debug message to. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
Even when driver is reloaded and hits this scenario the PSR mutex should be initialized, otherwise reading PSR debugfs status will execute mutex_lock() over a mutex that was not initialized. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
PSR support for VLV and CHV was dropped in commit ce3508fd ("drm/i915/psr: Nuke PSR support for VLV and CHV") so no need to keep this registers around. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
Turn out it is not a DMC bug it is actually a HW one, so this workaround will be needed for current gens, lets update the comment and remove the FIXME. BSpec: 7723 Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
The timeline is strictly ordered, so by inserting the timeline->barrier request into the timeline->last_request it naturally provides the same barrier. Consolidate the pair of barriers into one as they serve the same purpose. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
In order to avoid the malloc inside i915_globals_park() occurring underneath a lock connected to the shrinker (thus causing circular lockdeps warnings), move the rcu_worker to a global. <4> [39.085073] ====================================================== <4> [39.085273] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected <4> [39.085552] 5.1.0-rc3-CI-Trybot_4088+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [39.085752] ------------------------------------------------------ <4> [39.085949] kswapd0/32 is trying to acquire lock: <4> [39.086121] 00000000004b5f91 (wakeref#3){+.+.}, at: intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.086493] but task is already holding lock: <4> [39.086682] 00000000dd009a9a (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x30 <4> [39.086910] which lock already depends on the new lock. <4> [39.087139] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: <4> [39.087356] -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: <4> [39.087604] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.24+0x24/0x30 <4> [39.087785] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2a/0x290 <4> [39.087998] i915_globals_park+0x22/0xa0 [i915] <4> [39.088478] idle_work_handler+0x1df/0x220 [i915] <4> [39.089016] process_one_work+0x245/0x610 <4> [39.089447] worker_thread+0x37/0x380 <4> [39.089956] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [39.090374] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 <4> [39.090868] -> #1 (wakeref#4){+.+.}: <4> [39.091569] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [39.092054] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [39.092521] intel_gt_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.093047] intel_engine_park+0xeb/0x1d0 [i915] <4> [39.093514] __intel_wakeref_put_once+0x10/0x30 [i915] <4> [39.094062] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [39.094547] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [39.095110] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [39.095587] i915_gem_wait_for_idle.part.22+0xb2/0xf0 [i915] <4> [39.096142] switch_to_kernel_context_sync+0x2a/0x70 [i915] <4> [39.096633] i915_gem_init+0x59c/0x9c0 [i915] <4> [39.097174] i915_driver_load+0xd96/0x1880 [i915] <4> [39.097640] i915_pci_probe+0x29/0xa0 [i915] <4> [39.098145] pci_device_probe+0xa1/0x120 <4> [39.098607] really_probe+0xf3/0x3e0 <4> [39.099031] driver_probe_device+0x10a/0x120 <4> [39.099599] device_driver_attach+0x4b/0x50 <4> [39.100033] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 <4> [39.100525] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4> [39.100954] bus_add_driver+0x13f/0x210 <4> [39.101441] driver_register+0x56/0xe0 <4> [39.101891] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2e0 <4> [39.102319] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ea <4> [39.102805] load_module+0x2701/0x29e0 <4> [39.103231] __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0 <4> [39.103727] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x190 <4> [39.104153] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [39.104736] -> #0 (wakeref#3){+.+.}: <4> [39.105437] lock_acquire+0xa6/0x1c0 <4> [39.105923] __mutex_lock+0x8c/0x960 <4> [39.106345] atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock+0x33/0x50 <4> [39.106897] intel_engine_pm_put+0x1b/0x40 [i915] <4> [39.107375] i915_request_retire+0x477/0xaf0 [i915] <4> [39.107930] ring_retire_requests+0x86/0x160 [i915] <4> [39.108412] i915_retire_requests+0x58/0xc0 [i915] <4> [39.108934] i915_gem_shrink+0xd8/0x5b0 [i915] <4> [39.109431] i915_gem_shrinker_scan+0x59/0x130 [i915] <4> [39.109884] do_shrink_slab+0x131/0x3e0 <4> [39.110380] shrink_slab+0x228/0x2c0 <4> [39.110810] shrink_node+0x177/0x460 <4> [39.111317] balance_pgdat+0x239/0x580 <4> [39.111743] kswapd+0x186/0x570 <4> [39.112221] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4> [39.112641] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 Signed-off-by:
-
