- 19 Dec, 2023 40 commits
-
-
Matt Roper authored
The majority of xe_gt_irq_postinstall() is really focused on the hardware engine interrupts; other GT-related interrupts such as the GuC are enabled/disabled independently. Renaming the function and making it truly GT-specific will make it more clear what the intended focus is. Disabling/masking of other interrupts (such as GuC interrupts) is unnecessary since that has already happened during the irq_reset stage, and doing so will become harmful once the media GT is re-enabled since calls to xe_gt_irq_postinstall during media GT initialization would incorrectly disable the primary GT's GuC interrupts. Also, since this function is called from gt_fw_domain_init(), it's not necessary to also call it earlier during xe_irq_postinstall; just xe_irq_resume to handle runtime resume should be sufficient. v2: - Drop unnecessary !gt check. (Lucas) - Reword some comments about enable/unmask for clarity. (Lucas) Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-26-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
The xe_irq_postinstall() never actually gets called after installing the interrupt handler. This oversight seems to get papered over due to the fact that the (misnamed) xe_gt_irq_postinstall does more than it really should and gets called in the middle of the GT initialization. The callstack for postinstall is also a bit muddled with top-level device interrupt enablement happening within platform-specific functions called from the per-tile xe_gt_irq_postinstall() function. Clean this all up by adding the missing call to xe_irq_postinstall() after installing the interrupt handler and pull top-level irq enablement up to xe_irq_postinstall where we'd expect it to be. The xe_gt_irq_postinstall() function is still a bit misnamed here; an upcoming patch will refocus its purpose and rename it. v2: - Squash in patch to actually call xe_irq_postinstall() after installing the interrupt handler. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-25-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
Although primary and media GuC share a single interrupt enable bit, they each have distinct bits in the mask register. Although we always enable interrupts for the primary GuC before the media GuC today (and never disable either of them), this might not always be the case in the future, so use a RMW when updating the mask register to ensure the other GuC's mask doesn't get clobbered. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-24-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
Our only use of GUnit interrupts is to handle ASLE backlight operations that are reported as GUnit GSE interrupts. Move the enable/disable of these interrupts to a more sensible place, in the same area where we expect display interrupt code to be added by future patches. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-23-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
IRQ delivery and handling needs to be handled on a per-tile basis. Note that this is true even for the "GT interrupts" relating to engines and GuCs --- the interrupts relating to both GTs get raised through a single set of registers in the tile's sgunit range. On true multi-tile platforms, interrupts on remote tiles are internally forwarded to the root tile; the first thing the top-level interrupt handler should do is consult the root tile's instance of DG1_MSTR_TILE_INTR to determine which tile(s) had interrupts. This register is also responsible for enabling/disabling top-level reporting of any interrupts to the OS. Although this register technically exists on all tiles, it should only be used on the root tile. The (mis)use of struct xe_gt as a target for MMIO operations in the driver makes the code somewhat confusing since we wind up needing a GT pointer to handle programming that's unrelated to the GT. To mitigate this confusion, all of the xe_gt structures used solely as an MMIO target in interrupt code are renamed to 'mmio' so that it's clear that the structure being passed does not necessarily relate to any specific GT (primary or media) that we might be dealing with interrupts for. Reworking the driver's MMIO handling to not be dependent on xe_gt is planned as a future patch series. Note that GT initialization code currently calls xe_gt_irq_postinstall() in an attempt to enable the HWE interrupts for the GT being initialized. Unfortunately xe_gt_irq_postinstall() doesn't really match its name and does a bunch of other stuff unrelated to the GT interrupts (such as enabling the top-level device interrupts). That will be addressed in future patches. v2: - Clarify commit message with explanation of why DG1_MSTR_TILE_INTR is only used on the root tile, even though it's an sgunit register that is technically present in each tile's MMIO space. (Aravind) - Also clarify that the xe_gt used as a target for MMIO operations may or may not relate to the GT we're dealing with for interrupts. (Lucas) Cc: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-22-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
This media_gt pointer isn't actually allocated yet. Future patches will start hooking it up at appropriate places in the code, and then creation of the media GT will be added once those infrastructure changes are in place. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-20-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
In preparation for re-adding media GT support, switch the primary GT within the tile to a dynamic allocation. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-19-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
Now that tiles and GTs are handled separately, extra_gts[] doesn't really provide any useful information that we can't just infer directly. The primary GT of the root tile and of the remote tiles behave the same way and don't need independent handling. When we re-add support for media GTs in a future patch, the presence of media can be determined from MEDIA_VER() (i.e., >= 13) and media's GSI offset handling is expected to remain constant for all forseeable future platforms, so it won't need to be provided in a definition structure either. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-18-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
The VRAM ID is always the tile ID; there's no need to track it separately within a GT. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-17-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
There are a bunch of places in the driver where we need to perform non-GT MMIO against the platform's primary tile (display code, top-level interrupt enable/disable, driver initialization, etc.). Rename 'to_gt()' to 'xe_primary_mmio_gt()' to clarify that we're trying to get a primary MMIO handle for these top-level operations. In the future we need to move away from xe_gt as the target for MMIO operations (most of which are completely unrelated to GT). v2: - s/xe_primary_mmio_gt/xe_root_mmio_gt/ for more consistency with how we refer to tile 0. (Lucas) v3: - Tweak comment on xe_root_mmio_gt(). (Lucas) Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-16-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
Migration primarily focuses on the memory associated with a tile, so it makes more sense to track this at the tile level (especially since the driver was already skipping migration operations on media GTs). Note that the blitter engine used to perform the migration always lives in the tile's primary GT today. In theory that could change if media GTs ever start including blitter engines in the future, but we can extend the design if/when that happens in the future. v2: - Fix kunit test build - Kerneldoc parameter name update v3: - Removed leftover prototype for removed function. (Gustavo) - Remove unrelated / unwanted error handling change. (Gustavo) Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Acked-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-15-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
Since memory and address spaces are a tile concept rather than a GT concept, we need to plumb tile-based handling through lots of memory-related code. Note that one remaining shortcoming here that will need to be addressed before media GT support can be re-enabled is that although the address space is shared between a tile's GTs, each GT caches the PTEs independently in their own TLB and thus TLB invalidation should be handled at the GT level. v2: - Fix kunit test build. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-13-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
On platforms with VRAM, the VRAM is associated with the tile, not the GT. v2: - Unsquash the GGTT handling back into its own patch. - Fix kunit test build v3: - Tweak the "FIXME" comment to clarify that this function will be completely gone by the end of the series. (Lucas) v4: - Move a few changes that were supposed to be part of the GGTT patch back to that commit. (Gustavo) v5: - Kerneldoc parameter name fix. Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Acked-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-11-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
The GGTT exists at the tile level. When a tile contains multiple GTs, they share the same GGTT. v2: - Include some changes that were mis-squashed into the VRAM patch. (Gustavo) Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Acked-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-9-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
Each tile has its own register region in the BAR, containing instances of all registers for the platform. In contrast, the multiple GTs within a tile share the same MMIO space; there's just a small subset of registers (the GSI registers) which have multiple copies at different offsets (0x0 for primary GT, 0x380000 for media GT). Move the register MMIO region size/pointers to the tile structure, leaving just the GSI offset information in the GT structure. Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-7-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
As we start splitting tile handling out from GT handling, we'll need to be able to iterate over tiles separately from GTs. This iterator will be used in upcoming patches. v2: - s/(id__++)/(id__)++/ (Gustavo) Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Acked-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
Rather than a backpointer to the xe_device, a GT should have a backpointer to its tile (which can then be used to lookup the device if necessary). The gt_to_xe() helper macro (which moves from xe_gt.h to xe_gt_types.h) can and should still be used to jump directly from an xe_gt to xe_device. v2: - Fix kunit test build - Move a couple changes to the previous patch. (Lucas) Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
Create a new xe_tile structure to begin separating the concept of "tile" from "GT." A tile is effectively a complete GPU, and a GT is just one part of that. On platforms like MTL, there's only a single full GPU (tile) which has its IP blocks provided by two GTs. In contrast, a "multi-tile" platform like PVC is basically multiple complete GPUs packed behind a single PCI device. For now, just create xe_tile as a simple wrapper around xe_gt. The items in xe_gt that are truly tied to the tile rather than the GT will be moved in future patches. Support for multiple GTs per tile (i.e., the MTL standalone media case) will also be re-introduced in a future patch. v2: - Fix kunit test build - Move hunk from next patch to use local tile variable rather than direct xe->tiles[id] accesses. (Lucas) - Mention compute in kerneldoc. (Rodrigo) Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matt Roper authored
Xe incorrectly conflates the concept of 'tile' and 'GT.' Since MTL's media support is not yet functioning properly, let's just disable it completely for now while we fix the fundamental driver design. Support for media GTs on platforms like MTL will be re-added later. v2: - Drop some unrelated code cleanup that didn't belong in this patch. (Lucas) v3: - Drop unnecessary xe_gt.h include. (Gustavo) Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Acked-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601215244.678611-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.comSigned-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matthew Auld authored
It looks like the driver only wants to track one vma for each external object per vm. However it looks like bo_has_vm_references_locked() will ignore any vma that is marked as vma->destroyed (not actually destroyed yet). If we then mark our externally tracked vma as destroyed and then create a new vma for the same object and vm, we can have two externally tracked vma for the same object and vm. When the destroy actually happens it tries to move the external tracking to a different vma, but in this case it is already being tracked, leading to double list add errors. It should be safe to simply drop the destroyed check in bo_has_vm_references(), since the actual destroy will switch the external tracking to the next available vma. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/290 Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
__emit_job_gen12_render_compute() masks some PIPE_CONTROL bits that do not exist in platforms without render engine. So here replacing the PVC check by something more generic that will support any future platforms without render engine. Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Michael J. Ruhl authored
The _io_offset helper function is returning an offset into the GPU address space. Using the CPU address offset (io_) is not correct. Rename to reflect usage. Update to use GPU offset information. Update PT dma_offset to use the helper Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Michael J. Ruhl authored
The current method of sizing GT device memory is not quite right. Update the algorithm to use the relevant HW information and offsets to set up the sizing correctly. Update the stolen memory sizing to reflect the changes, and to be GT specific. Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Michael J. Ruhl authored
"Right sizing" the PCI BAR is not necessary. If rebar is needed size to the maximum available. Preserve the force_vram_bar_size sizing. Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Michael J. Ruhl authored
The _total_vram_size helper is device based and is not complete. Teach the helper to be tile aware and add the ability to size DG1 correctly. Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Maarten Lankhorst authored
When creating page tables from xe_exec_ioctl, we may end up freeing memory we just validated. To be certain this does not happen, do not allow the current reservation to be evicted from the ioctl. Callchain: [ 109.008522] xe_bo_move_notify+0x5c/0xf0 [xe] [ 109.008548] xe_bo_move+0x90/0x510 [xe] [ 109.008573] ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0xb7/0x170 [ttm] [ 109.008581] ttm_bo_swapout+0x15e/0x360 [ttm] [ 109.008586] ttm_device_swapout+0xc2/0x110 [ttm] [ 109.008592] ttm_global_swapout+0x47/0xc0 [ttm] [ 109.008598] ttm_tt_populate+0x7a/0x130 [ttm] [ 109.008603] ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0x160/0x170 [ttm] [ 109.008609] ttm_bo_validate+0xe5/0x1d0 [ttm] [ 109.008614] ttm_bo_init_reserved+0xac/0x190 [ttm] [ 109.008620] __xe_bo_create_locked+0x153/0x260 [xe] [ 109.008645] xe_bo_create_locked_range+0x77/0x360 [xe] [ 109.008671] xe_bo_create_pin_map_at+0x33/0x1f0 [xe] [ 109.008695] xe_bo_create_pin_map+0x11/0x20 [xe] [ 109.008721] xe_pt_create+0x69/0xf0 [xe] [ 109.008749] xe_pt_stage_bind_entry+0x208/0x430 [xe] [ 109.008776] xe_pt_walk_range+0xe9/0x2a0 [xe] [ 109.008802] xe_pt_walk_range+0x223/0x2a0 [xe] [ 109.008828] xe_pt_walk_range+0x223/0x2a0 [xe] [ 109.008853] __xe_pt_bind_vma+0x28d/0xbd0 [xe] [ 109.008878] xe_vm_bind_vma+0xc7/0x2f0 [xe] [ 109.008904] xe_vm_rebind+0x72/0x160 [xe] [ 109.008930] xe_exec_ioctl+0x22b/0xa70 [xe] [ 109.008955] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb9/0x150 [drm] [ 109.008972] drm_ioctl+0x210/0x430 [drm] [ 109.008988] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x85/0xb0 [ 109.008990] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 [ 109.008991] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc Original warning: [ 5613.149126] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 45883 at drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:504 xe_vm_unlock_dma_resv+0x43/0x50 [xe] ... [ 5613.226398] RIP: 0010:xe_vm_unlock_dma_resv+0x43/0x50 [xe] [ 5613.316098] Call Trace: [ 5613.318595] <TASK> [ 5613.320743] xe_exec_ioctl+0x383/0x8a0 [xe] [ 5613.325278] ? __is_insn_slot_addr+0x8e/0x110 [ 5613.329719] ? __is_insn_slot_addr+0x8e/0x110 [ 5613.334116] ? kernel_text_address+0x75/0xf0 [ 5613.338429] ? __pfx_stack_trace_consume_entry+0x10/0x10 [ 5613.343778] ? __kernel_text_address+0x9/0x40 [ 5613.348181] ? unwind_get_return_address+0x1a/0x30 [ 5613.353013] ? __pfx_stack_trace_consume_entry+0x10/0x10 [ 5613.358362] ? arch_stack_walk+0x99/0xf0 [ 5613.362329] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xb/0x70 [ 5613.366996] ? lock_acquire+0x287/0x2f0 [ 5613.370873] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xb/0x70 [ 5613.375530] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xb/0x70 [ 5613.380181] ? lock_release+0x225/0x2e0 [ 5613.384059] ? __pfx_xe_exec_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe] [ 5613.389092] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc0/0x170 [ 5613.393068] drm_ioctl+0x1b7/0x490 [ 5613.396519] ? __pfx_xe_exec_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe] [ 5613.401547] ? lock_release+0x225/0x2e0 [ 5613.405432] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xb0 [ 5613.409232] do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90 Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/239Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matthew Auld authored
Lockdep is unhappy about ggtt->lock -> runtime_pm, where it seems to think this can somehow get inverted. The ggtt->lock looks like a potentially sensitive driver lock, so likely a sensible move to never call the runtime_pm routines while holding it. Actually it looks like d3cold wants to grab this, so perhaps this can indeed deadlock. v2: - Don't forget about xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_vma(), which now needs explicit access_get. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matthew Auld authored
Seems to be a sensitive lock, where ct->lock looks to be primed with fs_reclaim, so holding that and then allocating memory will cause lockdep to complain. We need to change the ordering wrt to grabbing the ct->lock and potentially grabbing the runtime_pm, since some of the runtime_pm routines can allocate memory (or at least that's what lockdep seems to suggest). Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matthew Auld authored
There is no mention that migrate_copy() will skip copying the CCS aux state for all types of vram -> vram transfers. Currently we don't need such a facility but might be surprising if we ever do. v2: (Lucas): - s/lmem/vram/ in the commit message - Tidy up the code a bit; use one emit_copy_ccs() v3: - Reword the commit message Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Acked-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Matthew Auld authored
No need to allocate extra pages for this if we know flat-ccs AUX state is not even possible, like for normal system memory objects. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Thomas Hellström authored
Modify the xe_migrate_copy() function somewhat to explicitly allow copying of data between two buffer objects including system memory buffer objects. Update the migrate test accordingly. v2: - Check that buffer object sizes match when copying (Matthew Auld) Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Thomas Hellström authored
The TTM resource cursor was set up incorrectly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Lucas De Marchi authored
Port Wa_14014475959 to xe_wa fixing its condition. The workaround should only be applied on the primary GT, not on media. So just checking by MTL platform is not enough: checking GT is of the right type is also needed. Since the GRAPHICS_STEP() does checks the GT type, we could leave the first check as a platform one: it'd would be easier to understand and not go out of sync with the graphics_ip_map[] in drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c. However it also means that new platforms using the same IP wouldn't match. Prefer using the IP version. Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526164358.86393-22-lucas.demarchi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Lucas De Marchi authored
When running rules on MTL and beyond that have media as a standalone GT, the rule should only match if the gt passed as parameter match the version/range/stepping that the rule is checking. This allows workarounds affecting only the media GT to be applied only on that GT and vice-versa. For platforms before MTL, the GT will not be of media type, even if it includes media engines. Make sure to cover that case by checking if the platforma has standalone media. Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526164358.86393-21-lucas.demarchi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Lucas De Marchi authored
Port Wa_1509372804 to xe_wa so it's reported as active. v2: Match workaround database, starting from A0 stepping (Matt Roper) Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526164358.86393-20-lucas.demarchi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Lucas De Marchi authored
Wa_16015675438 and Wa_18020744125 apply to DG2 using the same action and conditions. Add both to the oob rules so they are both reported as active. Note that previously they were not checking by platform or IP version, hence making them not future-proof. Those workarounds should only be active in PVC and DG2, besides the check for "no render engine". v2: From current WA database, Wa_16015675438 applies to all DG2 subplatforms except G11. Migrate condition to use subplatform and remove G11 from the match (Matt Roper) Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526164358.86393-19-lucas.demarchi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Lucas De Marchi authored
Wa_22012727170 and Wa_22012727685 apply to DG2 using the same action and conditions. Add both to the oob rules so they are both reported as active. Do not Wa_22012727170 to PVC and MTL since only early A* steppings are affected. v2: Remove DG2_G10 from Wa_22012727685 to match current WA database (Matt Roper) v3: GRAPHICS_STEP(A0, FOREVER) can be left alone for DG2 as this means all steppings Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526164358.86393-18-lucas.demarchi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Lucas De Marchi authored
Port Wa_16011777198 to xe_wa so it's reported as active. Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526164358.86393-17-lucas.demarchi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Lucas De Marchi authored
Wa_14012197797 and Wa_22011391025 apply to DG2 using the same action. They apply to slightly different conditions. Add both to the oob rules so they are both reported as active. Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526164358.86393-16-lucas.demarchi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
Lucas De Marchi authored
Port Wa_16011759253 to oob. Wa_22011383443, that has the same action, doesn't need to be ported as it targets early PVC steppings. Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526164358.86393-15-lucas.demarchi@intel.comSigned-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-